Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3547514/Judge-offers-pay-teenager-s-court-fine-refuses-jail-stabbing-paedophile-abused-child.html#ixzz46H0WBmtq
Show More
Judge is a prat. It is one thing for us to think he deserved it (even after six years) but the law is supposed to be impartial and unemotional.
This is a difficult case.
She has some justification here, but we need to operate within a justice system, rather than just take personal revenge.
This girl is clearly troubled.
My suggestion would be confinement in a some of psychiatric institution, this girl patently needs help
She has some justification here, but we need to operate within a justice system, rather than just take personal revenge.
This girl is clearly troubled.
My suggestion would be confinement in a some of psychiatric institution, this girl patently needs help
From the titbits of information from the story in the Mail:
The judge does not see the girl as a threat to society as a whole
She acted under extreme duress
She rightly felt that she had been let down by judicial decisions in the past based on outdated sentencing guidelines
She had been the subject of further harassment from the perpetrator
No purpose would be served from jailing her or putting her into judicial custody
She handed herself in and confessed to the incident immediately
She has continued support from her family.
She needs support as opposed to punishment.
There will be many other details that the judge had access to not reported or considered sensational enough to report on in the paper.
Conclusion: Given the circumstances that are revealed the judge made a brave and correct decision.
Given what he knew when making it and what we don't know it would be obvious that this was the right course of action.
He is not a prat and the girl does not deserveor need to be dragged off into some secure mental unit.
Case closed. Next!
The judge does not see the girl as a threat to society as a whole
She acted under extreme duress
She rightly felt that she had been let down by judicial decisions in the past based on outdated sentencing guidelines
She had been the subject of further harassment from the perpetrator
No purpose would be served from jailing her or putting her into judicial custody
She handed herself in and confessed to the incident immediately
She has continued support from her family.
She needs support as opposed to punishment.
There will be many other details that the judge had access to not reported or considered sensational enough to report on in the paper.
Conclusion: Given the circumstances that are revealed the judge made a brave and correct decision.
Given what he knew when making it and what we don't know it would be obvious that this was the right course of action.
He is not a prat and the girl does not deserveor need to be dragged off into some secure mental unit.
Case closed. Next!
its not difficult at all. if the justice system "failed her", its not justification to stab someone no matter how heinous the crime
Johnny_Mustang 19 Apr 16 16:49 Joined: 18 Feb 07 | Topic/replies: 9,200 | Blogger: Johnny_Mustang's blog
Agree. Kangaroo courts will be next.
They already exist
Agree. Kangaroo courts will be next.
They already exist
I am glad you think it is that simple Clouseau
I cannot understand why this man was not sent to prison??????, this is a serious crime.
Because of this, this girl may well have felt she was to blame, even though she was not because she was only 8.
She has been excluded from school, something tells me this girl needs help.
Putting her into a mental health unit may allow people to see what is going on this with girl.
I was not suggesting it to punish her, but to offer her help, that was my point.
I cannot understand why this man was not sent to prison??????, this is a serious crime.
Because of this, this girl may well have felt she was to blame, even though she was not because she was only 8.
She has been excluded from school, something tells me this girl needs help.
Putting her into a mental health unit may allow people to see what is going on this with girl.
I was not suggesting it to punish her, but to offer her help, that was my point.
Two wrongs never make a right, it would have dealt with that problem.
She may not have needed to be there long, just seemed the right course here, oh well.
They don't pay me to be a judge.
She may not have needed to be there long, just seemed the right course here, oh well.
They don't pay me to be a judge.
She might stab someone else then he will be really fcked
Great call from the judge...deserves to be come Lord Chancellor
His call will not look so good if she stabs someone else will it.
I don't think we are allowed to stab one another unless it is in self defence.
She was failed by the law I can see that, when her abuser was not jailed, I find it hard to blame her.
But can the judge guarantee she wont do it again?
Unless the law allows women who have been abused or raped to stab their attacker in revenge?
Would save on court costs I suppose.
I don't think we are allowed to stab one another unless it is in self defence.
She was failed by the law I can see that, when her abuser was not jailed, I find it hard to blame her.
But can the judge guarantee she wont do it again?
Unless the law allows women who have been abused or raped to stab their attacker in revenge?
Would save on court costs I suppose.
Whilst you can't help but feel sorry for the girl you can't condone what she did.
Tis revenge not justice and where do you stop if you allow revenge.
Tis revenge not justice and where do you stop if you allow revenge.
ebul... The judge made his decision on much more information than is reported in the press.
The judge's decision, based on the evidence available, was that this is a one-off incident in a particular set of circumstances.
The judge's view, based on experience and knowledge, states that the girl is not a threat to society as a whole and that she would not benefit from incarceration in a mental health institution.
The girl's own life and self-esteem had already been indelibly affected through no conceivable fault of her own
Let's just accept that in these particular circumstances she needs and deserves all the support society can give to allow her to make the best of what's left.
The judge's decision, based on the evidence available, was that this is a one-off incident in a particular set of circumstances.
The judge's view, based on experience and knowledge, states that the girl is not a threat to society as a whole and that she would not benefit from incarceration in a mental health institution.
The girl's own life and self-esteem had already been indelibly affected through no conceivable fault of her own
Let's just accept that in these particular circumstances she needs and deserves all the support society can give to allow her to make the best of what's left.
That's fair enough..he knows more about the circumstances than I do
There is a precedent here, he has allowed someone to take personal revenge on someone that harmed her
by stabbing him, and it is perfectly legal
So my question is can everybody do this?????????????????????????????
There is a precedent here, he has allowed someone to take personal revenge on someone that harmed her
by stabbing him, and it is perfectly legal
So my question is can everybody do this?????????????????????????????
Yes they can ebul... if the circumstances are identical to this case, which they are unlikely to be.
A hairy-arsed judge has decided on the evidence before him that the girl did not deserve any further punishment to what she had already been subject to throughout her short life.
Well done the judge. We cannot contemplate what this girl has had to go through and continue to live her life in the shadow of.
It is not a vigilante charter. This case was decided on its merits. It does not set a precedent for people who have had their pint spilled to claim self-defence if they chin whoever did it.
To
A hairy-arsed judge has decided on the evidence before him that the girl did not deserve any further punishment to what she had already been subject to throughout her short life.
Well done the judge. We cannot contemplate what this girl has had to go through and continue to live her life in the shadow of.
It is not a vigilante charter. This case was decided on its merits. It does not set a precedent for people who have had their pint spilled to claim self-defence if they chin whoever did it.
To
All judgements set a precedent.
I can see the natural justice of it.
This is extreme behaviour, victims do not normally do this.
The original sentence on the man was wrong of course, it has never been remotely legal in this country since I remember
to sexually assault 8 year girls, or encourage them to engage in sex.
I wont say that this is an injustice, because I don't think the man has much room for complaint.
I don't know if this is on the Internet in any more detail?
I can see the natural justice of it.
This is extreme behaviour, victims do not normally do this.
The original sentence on the man was wrong of course, it has never been remotely legal in this country since I remember
to sexually assault 8 year girls, or encourage them to engage in sex.
I wont say that this is an injustice, because I don't think the man has much room for complaint.
I don't know if this is on the Internet in any more detail?
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539