Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
16 Apr 16
06:15
Joined:
Date Joined:
29 Sep 10
90 percent of all remakes are mince. but there are exceptions.
hollywood turned the french film the return of Martin Guerre into Somersby? with Richard Gere( terrible actor).
I noticed a while ago that tv movies, usually shown in the afternoons, are sometimes picked up and redone asbig budget films. They get Tom Cruise or Keannu Reeves to star in them.
name a bad remake....
hollywood turned the french film the return of Martin Guerre into Somersby? with Richard Gere( terrible actor).
I noticed a while ago that tv movies, usually shown in the afternoons, are sometimes picked up and redone asbig budget films. They get Tom Cruise or Keannu Reeves to star in them.
name a bad remake....
Show More
Wait for the new Ghostbusters with an all female cast, will be the biggest turkey of the century.
Steve Martin as Inspector Clouseau in The Pink Panther remake..even got a sequel as well..criminal
A sequel is not a remake.
That said, I don't hold out great hopes for the film. The book was easily the worst Welsh novel I've read.
That said, I don't hold out great hopes for the film. The book was easily the worst Welsh novel I've read.
Your crazy smiley has convinced me: there is NO difference between a sequel and a remake. 
There's been a number of Robin Hood remakes but Errol Flynn's version is still the best for me with Olivia De Havilland (still alive and will be 100 in July!!).
Bad remakes hmmm??? Get Carter with Sylvester Stallone and The Italian Job with that Wahlberg or whatever his name was, they need to be buried in the desert IMHO.
None of the King Kong remakes are a patch on the 1933 original.
Titanic, the Joseph Goebbels original 1943 is surprisingly good and a few scenes/ideas were used by Cameron for his effort.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539