if you didn`t hear it you are not entitled to comment, and if you did you may not understand what i mean!....they are very subtle and devious in their ways.
if you didn`t hear it you are not entitled to comment, and if you did you may not understand what i mean!....they are very subtle and devious in their ways.
man and woman in 11 year relationship man leaves woman woman has brief fling with a mutual friend supposedly after man has left(man claims he believes this ok whos to know) woman gets pregnant and in theory mutual friend is the father..he takes off. man and women meet over the next years as friends. no mention of who has paid alimony over the next 18 years At eighteen daughter asks to get paternity test to discover for sure her true father..no mention of why this was done at eighteen, did the mother stop it before then?, not broached by the BBC Turns out he was the father, not the guy who had briefly had a relationship after he left.
And so we have the moral of this story, which is? What are the BBC trying to imply, what do they want men to believe.
here is a basic summaryman and woman in 11 year relationshipman leaves womanwoman has brief fling with a mutual friend supposedly after man has left(man claims he believes this ok whos to know)woman gets pregnant and in theory mutual friend is the fa
Let me put it this way, to illustrate the increase in paternity tests did the BBC give over the programme to the story of a father who had been bringing someone up, or paying maintenance, for someone he believed was his child but wasn`t? No.
Let me put it this way, to illustrate the increase in paternity tests did the BBC give over the programme to the story of a father who had been bringing someone up, or paying maintenance, for someone he believed was his child but wasn`t? No.