Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
08 Feb 16
13:12
Joined:
Date Joined:
06 Apr 05
Apparently this will become a reality if we leave Europe.
Also, the Black Plague will return to Britain,
Swarms of locusts will eat all our crops,
and men's penises will shrink to half their size .
But this isn't scaremongering to get the "right" result.
Also, the Black Plague will return to Britain,
Swarms of locusts will eat all our crops,
and men's penises will shrink to half their size .
But this isn't scaremongering to get the "right" result.
Show More
It would be great if there were migrant camps in Kent,you could then give the French a taste of their own medicine use it as a transit camp and send them all to Calais.
so Kent would be full of people in camps trying to get to the UK illegally is Dave saying?
this the Le Touquet treaty between France, Belgium and the UK signed back in 2003 and has f*** all to do with the EU. The French have been after wriggling out of it for years anyway but the cash we give them would stop. Also if we left, France would be bound by the Dublin treaty, which places the responsibility for asylum applications on the European country of entry. If we were out we would not have to answer to rulings made by the European Court of Human Rights, nor would we have to honour the Dublin treaty at all. France however would still have to implement the deal. Is he threatening to stop us having any border controls? he'd be slaughtered by all parties.
good blog on the subject here. -
.
https://medium.com/@WhiteWednesday/brexit-and-calais-353211e08caa#.66jwa5tsf
.
https://medium.com/@WhiteWednesday/brexit-and-calais-353211e08caa#.66jwa5tsf
Wrote this previously.....
Britain signs up to accepting an agreed fair quota of refugees (not economic migrants as far as can be determined).
We build camps throughout the UK where these refugees and their families must stay for two years. There they will receive three meals a day, they will be clothed, and their religious principles will be recognised. Surely this is a far better option than where they have come from?
In return these refugees work in local industries, without pay, for those two years.
In addition to working in these industries, refugees must learn English and attend citizenship classes. The precise curriculum of these classes can be debated elsewhere but should cover all aspects of British history, leisure pursuits, culture (from the works of Benjamin Britten to **** As Folk to Carry On films to Monty Python) and the study of other religions.
All refugees should return to the camp every night.
At the end of the two years, each refugee should pass a test in written and oral English, on English cultural norms. They should then watch as a copy of the Qu'oran, the Talmud and Bible is burned in front of them, along with the Union Jack, the flag of their (previous) home nation and the Israeli flag.
Having done all this, every refugee will be given the greatest gift they could ever possess - a British Passport.
If they continually fail to return to camp - they are deported to their country of origin
If they engage in any illegal activity - they are deported to their country of origin
If they fail to engage sufficiently with the 'Citizenship process' - they are deported to their country of origin
If they cannot stand to watch national and religious emblems burned (the ultimate test of one's belief in 'freedom' and the pre-eminence of secular freedom over religious freedom that underpins the British way of life) - they are deported to their country of origin.
How will this be paid for?
By levying greater corporation tax on companies benefitting from free labour for two years and by engaging with the Third Sector in all aspects of the process from the clothing and feeding of the refugees to their citizenship classes.
Why all this?
Imagine being so in love with a notion of Britain that you would risk not only your own life but those of your children to establish a home here. A large percentage of our population do not give a sh1t about their moral responsibilities to the Nation (although they know plenty about their rights, both legal and economic).
Anyone that in love with Britain is a friend of mine. I'd have them as my next door neighbour in a heartbeat, because I have more in common with a Muslim / Hindu / Jew / Innuit Eskimo who is prepared to work hard, want a better life for their kids and who might teach me a thing or twenty about a life I (for the grace of being born in Britain) will never know than I do with a bone-idle Little Englander, moaning about how they took a sh1t last week and the Council still haven't been round to flush the toilet yet.
Britain signs up to accepting an agreed fair quota of refugees (not economic migrants as far as can be determined).
We build camps throughout the UK where these refugees and their families must stay for two years. There they will receive three meals a day, they will be clothed, and their religious principles will be recognised. Surely this is a far better option than where they have come from?
In return these refugees work in local industries, without pay, for those two years.
In addition to working in these industries, refugees must learn English and attend citizenship classes. The precise curriculum of these classes can be debated elsewhere but should cover all aspects of British history, leisure pursuits, culture (from the works of Benjamin Britten to **** As Folk to Carry On films to Monty Python) and the study of other religions.
All refugees should return to the camp every night.
At the end of the two years, each refugee should pass a test in written and oral English, on English cultural norms. They should then watch as a copy of the Qu'oran, the Talmud and Bible is burned in front of them, along with the Union Jack, the flag of their (previous) home nation and the Israeli flag.
Having done all this, every refugee will be given the greatest gift they could ever possess - a British Passport.
If they continually fail to return to camp - they are deported to their country of origin
If they engage in any illegal activity - they are deported to their country of origin
If they fail to engage sufficiently with the 'Citizenship process' - they are deported to their country of origin
If they cannot stand to watch national and religious emblems burned (the ultimate test of one's belief in 'freedom' and the pre-eminence of secular freedom over religious freedom that underpins the British way of life) - they are deported to their country of origin.
How will this be paid for?
By levying greater corporation tax on companies benefitting from free labour for two years and by engaging with the Third Sector in all aspects of the process from the clothing and feeding of the refugees to their citizenship classes.
Why all this?
Imagine being so in love with a notion of Britain that you would risk not only your own life but those of your children to establish a home here. A large percentage of our population do not give a sh1t about their moral responsibilities to the Nation (although they know plenty about their rights, both legal and economic).
Anyone that in love with Britain is a friend of mine. I'd have them as my next door neighbour in a heartbeat, because I have more in common with a Muslim / Hindu / Jew / Innuit Eskimo who is prepared to work hard, want a better life for their kids and who might teach me a thing or twenty about a life I (for the grace of being born in Britain) will never know than I do with a bone-idle Little Englander, moaning about how they took a sh1t last week and the Council still haven't been round to flush the toilet yet.
Both an exceptionally good prescription for what should happen and explanation of why such people would be a positive boon for the country roger.
Cameron is a cocck. He should have spent the last six years he's been in power addressing the question of why "refugees" are camped out in a rich, peaceful, fellow European country risking their lives hanging on to lorries in desperation to get into our country.
If they got here what need would they have camps?
The man is an idiot.
If they got here what need would they have camps?
The man is an idiot.
How do they get to Kent? walk through the tunnel? get off the train?
jump off a lorry?
jump off a lorry?
I don't think the Le Touquet Treaty suits Britain.
The problem is the 1951 Refugee convention and its notorious 1967 protocol.
Its stunning to watch this paralysis,all seem afraid to state the bleeding obvious,this convention and protocol have been bypassed by time.
Has no one in Britain got the gumption to shout stop.
Britain should repudiate the Le Touquet Treaty and the ridiculous Refugee convention and protocol.
The problem is the 1951 Refugee convention and its notorious 1967 protocol.
Its stunning to watch this paralysis,all seem afraid to state the bleeding obvious,this convention and protocol have been bypassed by time.
Has no one in Britain got the gumption to shout stop.
Britain should repudiate the Le Touquet Treaty and the ridiculous Refugee convention and protocol.
Sica Dan
Joined: 06 Oct 00
Replies: 2526
08 Feb 16 14:49
How do they get to Kent? walk through the tunnel? get off the train?
jump off a lorry?
We take them from Jordan, where there is a huge need to release the pressure on a country that is a real friend of the UK and where the refugees have engaged, legally, with the resettlement process and where they can be assessed far easier regarding their claims to refugee status and screened as a security risk.
Under no circumstances do we take anyone from Calais. These people are criminals and are only allowed to proliferate due to the supine nature of the Holland government - oh and the Schengen agreement of course.
Joined: 06 Oct 00
Replies: 2526
08 Feb 16 14:49
How do they get to Kent? walk through the tunnel? get off the train?
jump off a lorry?
We take them from Jordan, where there is a huge need to release the pressure on a country that is a real friend of the UK and where the refugees have engaged, legally, with the resettlement process and where they can be assessed far easier regarding their claims to refugee status and screened as a security risk.
Under no circumstances do we take anyone from Calais. These people are criminals and are only allowed to proliferate due to the supine nature of the Holland government - oh and the Schengen agreement of course.
What a lying piece of scum Cameron has proved to be...
Cameron's also bleating about our security being weakened in the event of us leaving the EU.
He's in the realms of threatening his own people in the service of a foreign power.
He's in the realms of threatening his own people in the service of a foreign power.
He cant last much longer, time for Boris to step up, vote out and take over.
'He's in the realms of threatening his own people in the service of a foreign power.'
Wow, that's good.
Wow, that's good.
WALOFS and there wil be nothing but fearmongering all the way to the out vote.
And the wankres are now going soft on prisoners, treating them like Mussies - FFS you have not changed the Mussie mindset so why do they think they will convert hardened criminals.
And the wankres are now going soft on prisoners, treating them like Mussies - FFS you have not changed the Mussie mindset so why do they think they will convert hardened criminals.
We could take them on a nice comfy train, to a pretty station with hanging baskets, and flower tubs.
Then a short walk to be de-loused and>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then a short walk to be de-loused and>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
At the moment the leave campaign is supposed to be ahead in the polls (ie its anyones guess)
But what happens if Cameron and his cronies get taken in by the polls?
Will he then come up with a half assed reason for putting the referendum back to 2017, by
which time he hopes his scaremongering will have taken effect.
But by then the migrant crisis could have got even worse, with riots and general pandemonium a weekly occurrence,
and countries like Sweden finally admitting they're in deep sh1t, while Europe buries its head and hands out
refugee quotas?
Going to be an interesting next few months.
But what happens if Cameron and his cronies get taken in by the polls?
Will he then come up with a half assed reason for putting the referendum back to 2017, by
which time he hopes his scaremongering will have taken effect.
But by then the migrant crisis could have got even worse, with riots and general pandemonium a weekly occurrence,
and countries like Sweden finally admitting they're in deep sh1t, while Europe buries its head and hands out
refugee quotas?
Going to be an interesting next few months.
From France - we have no intention of tearing up the agreement. Hope this helps.
He cant last much longer, time for Boris to step up, vote out and take over.
Does anyone really thinkBoris is PM standard outside of the home counties ? Sorry Ibrahim but it has to be Farage or maybe Davis or another who has yet to come to the fore.
Does anyone really thinkBoris is PM standard outside of the home counties ? Sorry Ibrahim but it has to be Farage or maybe Davis or another who has yet to come to the fore.
How an island country, in control of it's own immigration policy, would be a bad thing for our security and immigration policy, is something I don't understand.
On a separate topic, I hear the SNP would want Scotland to stay in the EU if Britain left.
Wasn't there a vote or something on Scottish Independence recently? Didn't the Scots vote to stay in the UK? Meaning they were subject to decisions on behalf of the whole of the UK/
Clearly I just dreamt it. Ditto the 'N' in SNP standing for Nationalist, when it's okay to be ruled from Brussels instead of London
On a separate topic, I hear the SNP would want Scotland to stay in the EU if Britain left.
Wasn't there a vote or something on Scottish Independence recently? Didn't the Scots vote to stay in the UK? Meaning they were subject to decisions on behalf of the whole of the UK/
Clearly I just dreamt it. Ditto the 'N' in SNP standing for Nationalist, when it's okay to be ruled from Brussels instead of London
Yes has always made me laugh that they want to be apart from the Scots that rule the UK(or did)
and be ruled from Europe instead.
As with Scotland one will put out a rogue poll that will
prompt Cameroon to offer an extra bribe(as with Scotland)to the outers
then forget about it when the right result has been granted
and be ruled from Europe instead.
As with Scotland one will put out a rogue poll that will
prompt Cameroon to offer an extra bribe(as with Scotland)to the outers
then forget about it when the right result has been granted
How on earth is this going to end well?
Islamic Invasion of Europe - Shocking Mass Immigration Video
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-AuGg1GwpY
Islamic Invasion of Europe - Shocking Mass Immigration Video
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-AuGg1GwpY
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539