Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
On the web-site "who is most influential black Briton?"
why not also ...
most influential white Briton?, or
most influential blonde woman? or
most influential person less than 5 feet tall?
Can you imagine the outcry? WTF
why not also ...
most influential white Briton?, or
most influential blonde woman? or
most influential person less than 5 feet tall?
Can you imagine the outcry? WTF
Show More
it's a perfectly reasonable survey to conduct
where's the racist bit?
where's the racist bit?
Is there a colour grading chart? is it better to be really dark for more votes. why have they got to emphasize anybody's race. I still maintain moira stewart was their best news reader. very professional. Never seemed to age. black don't crack, baby. but someone told me she was hard to work with, don't know if this was just green cheese.
watched the BBC license fee committee on parliament channel.. looks like the beeb have won against the government and are gonna get their rise for the license fee along with closing the loophole for people to watch tv retrospectively for free. Everyone must comply. the bbc are wonderful. all hail zod.
watched the BBC license fee committee on parliament channel.. looks like the beeb have won against the government and are gonna get their rise for the license fee along with closing the loophole for people to watch tv retrospectively for free. Everyone must comply. the bbc are wonderful. all hail zod.
where's the racist bit?
Ironically, that kicks in when it comes to choosing tall, white men to run the BBC.
Ironically, that kicks in when it comes to choosing tall, white men to run the BBC.
No black Briton gets mentioned on the betfair forums more than Diane Abbot so surely she must be 1.01 for the award
Sir Lenny Henry got a mention on the BBC website.
The anti racists who emphasise skin colour are a racist bunch.
The anti racists who emphasise skin colour are a racist bunch.
Who was the mechanic on crossroads?
Can't think of his name...... could've been Mack ?
Can't think of his name...... could've been Mack ?
Moira Stewart seems to be getting more white - she looks good for an old dear though
just because you are just waking up in your student garret coachbuster!!! Some of us 'mature' ones are ok. Well my nurse says I am.
A Study in Contrasts
58 Views 0 by Frederick Dixon
So the San Bernadino shootings turn out to be the work of a couple of Moslems who were self-proclaimed jihadists. ISIL too claims that they were on Jihad. Yet it took several days for the U.S. authorities and the liberal dominated media to take them at their word and to agree, hesitantly and reluctantly, that this was an act of terrorism.
Contrast the shooting in a South Carolina church a few months ago by a young white supremacist; there was no trace of hesitation then as the entire media and political establishment rushed to judgment and condemnation. A photograph appeared of the shooter clutching a small Southern Cross flag – one of the flags of the Confederacy – and that was the signal for an all out assault on the cultural and historic heritage of the American South; Confederate flags were removed from state legislatures, court houses and universities throughout the South; statues of Confederate heroes were removed; parks and streets were renamed.
Contrast too the reaction a few years ago to the shooting (fortunately non fatal) of a US Democratic congresswoman. The perpetrator had the Christian name “Jared”. This also happens to be the Christian name of the well known race realist and proprietor of the American Renaissance website, Jared Taylor, so what better evidence was needed that the perpetrator must be a White Supremacist Nazi? Happily the shrieking media lynch mob very quickly ended up with egg on its collective face when it emerged (to be quietly reported with short paragraphs on inside pages) that the shooter was a mentally unstable young man with ties to far LEFT organisations.
Needless to say, this disproportionate reaction is not confined to the United States. I was listening to Radio 5 a day or two after the recent events in Paris when the presenter Adrian Chiles was taking calls from members of the public. One call was from a head teacher who believed, not surprisingly, that education was the answer to extremism but that it was very important not to single out Moslems for condemnation, so in his school the pupils were taught about the EDL as well as ISIL. The EDL? How many people have the EDL killed? How many women have the EDL rounded up and turned into sex slaves? Chiles didn’t see fit to challenge the caller on the evident absurdity of such an equivalence but that, I suspect, is because he didn’t see it as absurd; somehow the EDL has entered the demonology of the Left (of which the BBC is the broadcasting division) not as the rather disorganised, but harmless, protest group which it actually is but rather as if it were the English arm of the Ku Klux Klan.
Hypocrisy is hardly new of course, it is the vice which always accompanies whatever the currently prevailing virtue happens to be, and the currently prevailing virtue is political correctness. But in the end people always see through it and react against it. The surge in support for Donald Trump in the United States is, in part, an explicit reaction by ordinary Whites against the ongoing campaign of dispossession represented by the “Black Lives Matter” movement and the associated destruction of White heritage described above. In continental Europe we see the rise and rise of patriotic movements also in reaction against White dispossession; that dispossession takes a different form in Europe from that which we see in the United States, but it is just as deadly – and the reaction against it every bit as hopeful for our people.
58 Views 0 by Frederick Dixon
So the San Bernadino shootings turn out to be the work of a couple of Moslems who were self-proclaimed jihadists. ISIL too claims that they were on Jihad. Yet it took several days for the U.S. authorities and the liberal dominated media to take them at their word and to agree, hesitantly and reluctantly, that this was an act of terrorism.
Contrast the shooting in a South Carolina church a few months ago by a young white supremacist; there was no trace of hesitation then as the entire media and political establishment rushed to judgment and condemnation. A photograph appeared of the shooter clutching a small Southern Cross flag – one of the flags of the Confederacy – and that was the signal for an all out assault on the cultural and historic heritage of the American South; Confederate flags were removed from state legislatures, court houses and universities throughout the South; statues of Confederate heroes were removed; parks and streets were renamed.
Contrast too the reaction a few years ago to the shooting (fortunately non fatal) of a US Democratic congresswoman. The perpetrator had the Christian name “Jared”. This also happens to be the Christian name of the well known race realist and proprietor of the American Renaissance website, Jared Taylor, so what better evidence was needed that the perpetrator must be a White Supremacist Nazi? Happily the shrieking media lynch mob very quickly ended up with egg on its collective face when it emerged (to be quietly reported with short paragraphs on inside pages) that the shooter was a mentally unstable young man with ties to far LEFT organisations.
Needless to say, this disproportionate reaction is not confined to the United States. I was listening to Radio 5 a day or two after the recent events in Paris when the presenter Adrian Chiles was taking calls from members of the public. One call was from a head teacher who believed, not surprisingly, that education was the answer to extremism but that it was very important not to single out Moslems for condemnation, so in his school the pupils were taught about the EDL as well as ISIL. The EDL? How many people have the EDL killed? How many women have the EDL rounded up and turned into sex slaves? Chiles didn’t see fit to challenge the caller on the evident absurdity of such an equivalence but that, I suspect, is because he didn’t see it as absurd; somehow the EDL has entered the demonology of the Left (of which the BBC is the broadcasting division) not as the rather disorganised, but harmless, protest group which it actually is but rather as if it were the English arm of the Ku Klux Klan.
Hypocrisy is hardly new of course, it is the vice which always accompanies whatever the currently prevailing virtue happens to be, and the currently prevailing virtue is political correctness. But in the end people always see through it and react against it. The surge in support for Donald Trump in the United States is, in part, an explicit reaction by ordinary Whites against the ongoing campaign of dispossession represented by the “Black Lives Matter” movement and the associated destruction of White heritage described above. In continental Europe we see the rise and rise of patriotic movements also in reaction against White dispossession; that dispossession takes a different form in Europe from that which we see in the United States, but it is just as deadly – and the reaction against it every bit as hopeful for our people.
Two sides of the same coin, both needing each other to survive, both with plenty in common (hatred of toleration, homosexuality, education, women's rights and the rather vague term 'liberals' i.e the term they've picked up from America and not believers in government getting out of the way and general freedom).
"Racist BBC at it yet again"
BBC ..infested with them !
BBC ..infested with them !
Racist BBC at it yet again ...
mememe
mememe 24 Nov 15 10:24 Joined: 21 Jan 11 | Topic/replies: 1,498 | Blogger: mememe's blog
On the web-site "who is most influential black Briton?"
why not also ...
most influential white Briton?, or
most influential blonde woman? or SEXIST
most influential person less than 5 feet tall?
Can you imagine the outcry? WTF
mememe
mememe 24 Nov 15 10:24 Joined: 21 Jan 11 | Topic/replies: 1,498 | Blogger: mememe's blog
On the web-site "who is most influential black Briton?"
why not also ...
most influential white Briton?, or
most influential blonde woman? or SEXIST
most influential person less than 5 feet tall?
Can you imagine the outcry? WTF
Clearly an attack on a Christian.
After insisting that “nominees for BBC Sports Personality of the Year are decided on their sporting achievements” an ‘impartial’ BBC news reader has bluntly labeled Britain’s new heavyweight champion of the world a “dickhead” who “should not” win due to his socially conservative views on homosexuality, women and abortion.
Tyson Fury is an 18 stone brawler and the son of Irish travellers who left school at the age of 11. Largely in keeping with his background, some of his views are severely socially conservative, old-fashioned, even distasteful.
He is Christian, and fiercely committed to his wife; he has boasted of how they did not consecrate until after the ceremony and he believes the best place for a women is “in the kitchen on her back”.
He’s also really, really not a fan of homosexuality or abortion.
“We live in an evil world,” he told the Daily Mail just before his recent world championship bout with Wladimir Klitschko, “The devil is very strong at the minute, very strong, and I believe the end is near. The bible tells me the end is near.”
Adding: “There are only three things that need to be accomplished before the devil comes home: one of them is homosexuality being legal in countries, one of them is abortion and the other one’s paedophilia.
“Who would have thought in the 50s and 60s that those first two would be legalised?”
After his surprise victory over Klitschko, making him world champion and a favourite for BBC Sports Personality of the Year, his views came under renewed scrutiny.
Labour party MP’s summoned him to parliament for re-education and more than 90,000 people signed the obligatory online petition to have the boxer dropped from the short list for the BBC award.
The BBC initially attempted to appear neutral, putting out a statement in response to the petition, which read.
“The nominees for BBC Sports Personality of the Year are decided on their sporting achievements. As Fury became heavyweight champion of the world over the weekend, the panel feel that he should be a contender for this year’s award.”
However at 11.30pm last night, Clive Myrie, a 27-year veteran of the BBC, was discussing the issue on the newspaper review programme with the Telegraph’s Christopher Hope, who infamously attacked UKIP for not having enough “black faces” in their manifesto booklet.
“You cannot be a dickhead and win Sports Personality of the Year”, blurted out Mr. Myrie after clarifying that “it is past the watershed” – as if the British 9pm break in programming that indicates when someone can swear or not is also a political bias watershed.
Going by the photo below, however, I don’t think Mr. Fury will be too bothered by the BBC revealing their underlying view of him.
After insisting that “nominees for BBC Sports Personality of the Year are decided on their sporting achievements” an ‘impartial’ BBC news reader has bluntly labeled Britain’s new heavyweight champion of the world a “dickhead” who “should not” win due to his socially conservative views on homosexuality, women and abortion.
Tyson Fury is an 18 stone brawler and the son of Irish travellers who left school at the age of 11. Largely in keeping with his background, some of his views are severely socially conservative, old-fashioned, even distasteful.
He is Christian, and fiercely committed to his wife; he has boasted of how they did not consecrate until after the ceremony and he believes the best place for a women is “in the kitchen on her back”.
He’s also really, really not a fan of homosexuality or abortion.
“We live in an evil world,” he told the Daily Mail just before his recent world championship bout with Wladimir Klitschko, “The devil is very strong at the minute, very strong, and I believe the end is near. The bible tells me the end is near.”
Adding: “There are only three things that need to be accomplished before the devil comes home: one of them is homosexuality being legal in countries, one of them is abortion and the other one’s paedophilia.
“Who would have thought in the 50s and 60s that those first two would be legalised?”
After his surprise victory over Klitschko, making him world champion and a favourite for BBC Sports Personality of the Year, his views came under renewed scrutiny.
Labour party MP’s summoned him to parliament for re-education and more than 90,000 people signed the obligatory online petition to have the boxer dropped from the short list for the BBC award.
The BBC initially attempted to appear neutral, putting out a statement in response to the petition, which read.
“The nominees for BBC Sports Personality of the Year are decided on their sporting achievements. As Fury became heavyweight champion of the world over the weekend, the panel feel that he should be a contender for this year’s award.”
However at 11.30pm last night, Clive Myrie, a 27-year veteran of the BBC, was discussing the issue on the newspaper review programme with the Telegraph’s Christopher Hope, who infamously attacked UKIP for not having enough “black faces” in their manifesto booklet.
“You cannot be a dickhead and win Sports Personality of the Year”, blurted out Mr. Myrie after clarifying that “it is past the watershed” – as if the British 9pm break in programming that indicates when someone can swear or not is also a political bias watershed.
Going by the photo below, however, I don’t think Mr. Fury will be too bothered by the BBC revealing their underlying view of him.
I hope Fury wins the award. That would really stick it up The Gouine Squad.
Baffling that so called liberals support killing the unborn.
They truly are a F**** up bunch of dimwits.
As for Myrie, he fills a quota..
They truly are a F**** up bunch of dimwits.
As for Myrie, he fills a quota..
he's a religious fundamentalist. Why should anyone be surprised by his views?
muhammad ali goes on racist tirade
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HBnc8YNaaQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HBnc8YNaaQ
Injera
09 Dec 15 18:41
Baffling that so called liberals support killing the unborn.
Killing something that isn't alive? That's baffling.
09 Dec 15 18:41
Baffling that so called liberals support killing the unborn.
Killing something that isn't alive? That's baffling.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539