I used to use windows 3.1 - when loading it into a pc i used 4 floppy discs for DOS. then 10 discs for windows. a total of 20mb. you could go on the internet and it was working all be it at a crawl.
windows 95 came in and it was on a cd. 700mb?
the stability seems to have gone down the shute. I equate it to and upside down pyramid.
cannot say any later versions have really impressed me - the level of frustration has increased.
if Karma really existed Microsoft headquarters would explode every day with the psychic energy being targetted towards them.
Windows 3.1 is far less stable than e.g. Windows 7! There is no comparison.
Betfair run their servers on Windows 3.1, that's common knowledge.
They have to employ a temp to move the mouse every so often or the flying toasters screensaver comes on and crashes everything, but he's often sidetracked watching the football on Sky on a saturday afternoon.
Windows 3.1 is far less stable than e.g. Windows 7! There is no comparison.Betfair run their servers on Windows 3.1, that's common knowledge.They have to employ a temp to move the mouse every so often or the flying toasters screensaver comes on and c
Windows 7 on my laptop is more than a match for apples offering on my imac
However, Bill Gates should be shot purely for the decline of Microsoft office
Windows 7 on my laptop is more than a match for apples offering on my imac However, Bill Gates should be shot purely for the decline of Microsoft office
Android, are you kidding me. I looked forward to getting my first android devices, what a disappontment, what I got was flakey, obvious bugs, and a bit cr*p. I refuse to "subcribe" to office and get by with open office, does what I need.
Android, are you kidding me. I looked forward to getting my first android devices, what a disappontment, what I got was flakey, obvious bugs, and a bit cr*p. I refuse to "subcribe" to office and get by with open office, does what I need.