"BBC still refuse to report this and this has nothing to do with islam"
Next they'll (the BBC) will be offering him (Terrorist) a Job as a Political Correspondent ....or he'll go to the Guardian !

From all reports, the would-be killer is not the sharpest mass murderer in the toolbox.

He forgot to lock the toilet door so the French passenger burst in on him (and tried but failed to disarm him) and made so much noise that the Americans recognised the sound of a gun being loaded. He did not load the pistol properly, and managed the almost impossible task of jamming an AK47, a weapon whose whole raison d'etre is not jamming in sandy deserts or muddy swamps.

Which mental shortcomings probably explain why he was so easily convinced that God needed him to massacre a bunch of tourists.

The more these Muslim nutters do the more the guardian and the bbc seem to support their actions, I am suprised that under the current anti terror laws they haven't been  changed with inciting an act of terrorism.

What percentage of the incomers will be paedophiles, the sort who left their indelible 'vibrant' and 'enriching' mark on any number of sexually-underaged white girls in umpteen UK towns?

Is anyone going to bother checking whether any of the incomers has a criminal record, or suffering from a serious health condition?

Just in, he has a Blue Peter badge from 2005, and was given a funny look in 2008 !

It isn't eveb remotely true, Naydam. 18 hours ago the BBC came out with this:

https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/635042761620762626

"...train gunman suspected of belonging to radical Islamist group but identity not established..."

Obviously it was on the main website too.

I actually agree that the press is, on balance, palpably pro-immigration and left-leaning, but its bias is dwarfed by those on here who seem to be egging each further and further into the realms of fantasy.

The Old Bill are making one arrest a day on terrorism charges.

I would not be exaggerating to say 99%+ are people who have been heavily influenced by a brand of Islam that leads them to violence.

That's just in this country. Abroad it is an issue affecting many nations. Muslims are killing Muslims in the main. But others are randomnly targeted in a world wide Jihad.

We've yet to see the media fully acknowledge this. They are often at pains to say the terrorists do not reflect Islam.

I beg to differ.

1 arrest a day - would that be in relation to the 5 IRA members arrested for the murder of the dissident McGuigan? Do they count? There are regular arrests in NI for terrorism. They haven't gone away you know but how many are Islamic extremists?

So, ninety-nine times out of a hundred, this ONE person who is today's terrorist arrest is found to be guilty.

They probably arrest more people for having sex with donkeys!
(I was shampooing her, Officer. Just keeping my clothes dry!)

As for the authorities being aware of this man's existence...what do you suggest they do? Charge him? With what? Had he committed previous offences that they could prove?


Thank you, Patra. It is reassuring to still hear balanced, logical replies.

The BBC are disgusting.  I had the World Service on and apart from mentioning it every half hour for about 5 minutes and doing an interview with one of the Americans dad, local police and some of the passengers you would have known nothing about it. Typical leftie cover up.

Rubber dinghy rapids bro

You've killed the special needs donkey

TommyBarnes was taking the p*ss you muppet!

Every sentence and every word in that sentence from the BBC will be used to promote their anti western ideology. It is even more subtle than you would believe...

There was a programme that mentioned Guy Burgess, the soviet spy, and one time BBC employee just a few weeks ago....in a passing sentence they said that he had betrayed the British establishment..

The BBC could not bring themselves to say that this communist traitor had betrayed Britain....it was the establishment. The lies and manipulation of the message continues, they employed Burgess then who wanted the death and destruction of Britain and they continue today.

The reason people pass comment on the BBC in this area is quite simple : they deserve it.
I watched a couple of reports on the migrant issue this week and it was if anything more biased than ever. The narrative they are pushing is very obvious: we should be letting them all in, if not also helping them to get here, and anyone against it or even questions it is a bad person or racist.
Take Macedonia, how dare be seen to be wanting to protect their borders and not let a pile people in who they didn't want to stroll on in. The BBC angle was very clearly that Macedonia was bad for this. I wonder how the lefties think their buddy Putin would handle them?

Lfc1971. Perhaps the bounder also betrayed the BBC?

Mad mad moon. Well, I suppose that, now he HAS committed an offence, he will be sent to trial. But you couldn't send him before because he'd done nowt wrong.

Just checking. Macedonia seems to be providing every assistance to the migrants in order to help them on their way.

All countries seem to be in agreement that they should be accepted. Who is against it? Is this the fault of the BBC?

"which very shrew" is a spectacular combination of missed words and letters.
I'm posting it to 8 out of 10 do countdown as a conundrum.

Just checking. I do believe that the UK are proving somewhat difficult regarding the technicalities of the matter. However, that will change as soon as the migrants are accepted by any EU country.

Did I miss the report? I don't know. I didn't know that there had been a report. But from what I cam see, they get into dodgy boats and we (Europe etc) pick them up and bring them here (Europe).
Could you supply a list of countries that have refused to accept refugees?

Or the threads on this forum pointing out that Poland I think it was is only accepting a small number and they have to be christian? We're not in Schengen and are an island, thankfully.

So you're having a lengthy argument about the detail of BBC coverage and you don't watch it.
You are quite literally: ignorant (and in more ways than one).

And you call me "overloaded with .. opinions". I give up, arguing with your like is beyond pointless.

Well done to France for awarding the Legion d'Honneur to the heroes who downed the gunman and prevented carnage.

Full marks to the officials who have already made up their minds about the motives of the man with the gun. It seems they don't believe the embarrassing drivel about him finding the guns in a bag in a Brussels park after all. I'm surprised The Guardian hasn't yet waded in though to cast doubt and urge caution on the accepted version of events. No doubt there's still time.

Needless to say, the heroes would not have been presented with anything so fitting over here until there had been any number of fatuous trials, appeals, judicial reviews etc brought by any number of chancer Human Rights cretins on the gunman's behalf. And paid for by the UK taxpayer.