|
By:
Any letters in it?
|
|
By:
sorry numbers game lol
|
|
By:
953
![]() |
|
By:
953 stands out a mile
|
|
By:
I've got it. 952
|
|
By:
Excellent, well done.
|
|
By:
care to share
![]() |
|
By:
Not that good Kenny!! I remember seeing it done!
![]() |
|
By:
No, I won't give away the trick.
|
|
By:
953 obviously straightforward as crags says.
|
|
By:
I was reminded of it when I saw the Countdown Gotcha tonight, Torq', which was utterly brilliant.
|
|
By:
The man who solved it didn't actually know it was correct within the 30 seconds, he just knew it should be correct. Mathematicians think differently.
|
|
By:
Yes he seemed uncertain, watched it tonight.
|
|
By:
I have 157
|
|
By:
Hard luck there
![]() |
|
By:
Clue 1. Start with the 100 or 6.
|
|
By:
3+6 = 9 x 100 = 900 + 50 = 950 + (75/25 = 3) = 953
|
|
By:
953 is easy, with respect.
|
|
By:
100 + 6 = 106
106 × 3 = 318 318 x 75 = 23850 23850 - 50 = 23800 23800 / 25 = 952 |
|
By:
brilliant but for most of us undoable
|
|
By:
75 * 6 / 50 = 9
(100 + 3) * 9 = 927 +25 = 952 |
|
By:
Only started making headway after Kenny's clue - was stumped otherwise
![]() |
|
By:
that ones more doable as most of us dont think big
|
|
By:
Nicely done TBB - that is neater
![]() |
|
By:
Well done EK, exactly how it was done on the programme.
![]() Good work also TBB. Here's the guy solving it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfa3MHLLSWI |
|
By:
From 1997. We were all younger then. Carol looks as if she might be pregnant.
|
|
By:
I saw this years ago, reminds though how much better Rachel Riley is, well she got a higher degree.
But so much of the show when Vorderman was go was fake, fake laugh, dragging on conversations to draw attention to herself etc, great arse though. |
|
By:
Rachel draws a ****, superbediting, lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peLXmKePK-Q |
|
By:
Rachel draws a ****, superbediting, lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peLXmKePK-Q |
|
By:
@scandinavian_haven -- reminds though how much better Rachel Riley is, well she got a higher degree.
But so much of the show when Vorderman was go was fake, fake laugh, dragging on conversations to draw attention to herself etc, great arse though. You'd think, given the nature of (part of) the audience, that someone would have produced definitive figures to show which one is better at the numbers game -- faster solutions; fewer failures; harder sums -- that sort of thing. A quick search failed to turn anything up though. |
|
By:
I remember Rachel struggled when she first started, missing a few easy numbers.
I only watch now if she's wearing a very short skirt! |
|
By:
Google's a wonderful thing.
|