Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
TheBetterBettor
19 Jun 15 15:30
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 12
| Topic/replies: 11,511 | Blogger: TheBetterBettor's blog
Conspiracy theorists are closely analysing the situation as we speak.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 42
By:
History Maker
When: 19 Jun 15 15:33
Or £3bn ish and 6 years
By:
cod-eyed-inbread
When: 19 Jun 15 15:41
bring back mr fawkes
By:
FOYLESWAR
When: 19 Jun 15 16:18
will the mps be chipping in !
By:
akabula
When: 19 Jun 15 19:37
Money well spent.
By:
GAZO
When: 19 Jun 15 19:40
get tommy walsh on the job
By:
akabula
When: 19 Jun 15 19:42
It'll be on cowboy builders in a few years.
By:
MisterBadger
When: 19 Jun 15 20:06
cowboy occupants more like
By:
brendanuk1
When: 19 Jun 15 20:07
ridiculous amount
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 19 Jun 15 20:18
surely they'll get an EU grant for it, after all the EU flag was flying there on the state opening of parliament
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 20:37
It's a big building. They could upgrade that clock to a digital one, clockwork is so old fashioned.

And could get it sponsored? The "Sports Direct Parliamentary Arena" has a certain ring.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 19 Jun 15 20:44
That midget bellend Alan Duncan was interviewed on the news at lunchtime spouting off about the idiocy of suggesting that they move out of London. A complete non starter says he. I think he'll find we pay his wages and he is our servant. Instead of talking with politicians acknowledging that this country has become too London centric perhaps they should show us by taking the lad and relocating with all the benefits which flow from such a decision.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 19 Jun 15 20:45
lead.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 19 Jun 15 20:45
There's been quite enough taking of lads gone on down there.
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 20:51
If they move it out of london how much is that going to cost in extra expenses to house all the MPs who will already have london accomodation, and it will be by definition away from the highest concentration of consituencies anyway, and also the offices of state/civil servants?

It seems pointless gesture politics to me, and I'm in favour of decentralisation.
By:
akabula
When: 19 Jun 15 21:15
On a serious note I think they should renovate them.
Very impressive both inside and out whilst visit Holyrood and be suitably unimpressed.
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 21:25
I think they should. If they do enough of rework with 3 billion to last another 200 years thats just 15 million a year. I've never been in them but they are world famous and part of being British and far more than just a debating chamber.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 19 Jun 15 21:31
Just put up a plastic version, the yanks wont notice for certain.
By:
Clouseau
When: 19 Jun 15 21:33
I know a few Polish lads who could do it cheaper and a lot quicker.
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 21:37
It needs a lot more than a polish.
By:
akabula
When: 19 Jun 15 22:46
Breath-taking both inside and out. A real sense of history about the place. Would be sacrilege to even contemplate letting it go to ruin.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 19 Jun 15 22:48
that maybe correct but nothing is worth that money aka
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 22:53
You say that but what are they going to do, knock it down?
It's a historical palace FFS.
And though I've not been in it AFAIK it's a massive building that does a lot of government not just a debating chamber. I like good old buildings, they were built to last.
Modern cr*p falls apart after 30 years never mind 300.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 19 Jun 15 22:58
Sometimes something isnt worth it, clearly i would like it to last for ever.

It should take millions not billions, the only reason billions are involved is because the contract involves the rich people.

Just like the HS1, uk is 90m per km, france it is 20m per km.

FACT.
By:
akabula
When: 19 Jun 15 23:14
As JC has already pointed out it is not a lot year by year spend.
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 23:17
Surely that's to do with the fact that France has a very much lower population density so they can throw it down through many miles of open fields and in the UK you tend to have to go through urban areas and knock down bridges and so on?

I've read before there are large difficulties with modernising the british rail network because they are limited as to what was laid down 90 odd years ago. It's nothing to do with rich people.
By:
Just Checking
When: 19 Jun 15 23:21
The scottish parliament cost something like 0.5 billion, 1/6 of the size of this refurbishment, and it's much smaller, ugly as hell, and AFAIK has large maintenance costs, and is already falling apart.

What are you going to get for your 3 billion for this purpose, and where?

Do you really think they'll level the old building? And what, put up a Tesco?
By:
The Leopard
When: 19 Jun 15 23:25
No....a Mosque.
By:
kincsem
When: 20 Jun 15 05:24
The sensible thing would be build something suited to MP needs with good debating areas, restaurants, bars, private MP rooms. admin staff rooms, computer server rooms, communications rooms, good security features, air conditioning?
It will be a waste of money trying to put lipstick on that pig.  Renovation will be a nice contract for someone - take as long as you want, charge as much as you want.
They could build a modern building while replicating the outside appearance of the present premises.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 20 Jun 15 08:49
cod-eyed-inbread • June 19, 2015 3:41 PM BST


bring back mr fawkes



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jV2Mjc_kkY
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Jun 15 09:07
It doesn't need any work done at this moment, it should be maintained as and when problems occur, we can look at the problem again in 100 years time, by then it may not matter.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 20 Jun 15 09:09
^^^ with the asbestos seeping out of the seams.
By:
Just Checking
When: 20 Jun 15 09:16
"It doesn't need any work done at this moment". Fantastic news! A couple of questions though? :
Are you
1. A structural engineer
2. A stonemason
3. An architect.
4. None none of the above, Ian Beal from Eastenders probably knows more about stonemasonry
Did you conduct your site survey from
5. A ladder
6. A cherry picker
7. Scaffolding
8. A site walk-around with binoculars in good light conditions
9. Your sofa, have absolutely no idea about it but it's got a big clock in a tower on ITN news?
By:
Just Checking
When: 20 Jun 15 09:18
Sorry LFC LaughBlushLoveWhoops
By:
Just Checking
When: 20 Jun 15 09:19
Seriously thought, stitch in time and all that. It applies to buildings as well.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Jun 15 09:32
Laughyes exactly just checking...they should use your name as a guide...a little bit of maintainence is all it needs...bit by bit over the next years.
By:
Clouseau
When: 20 Jun 15 09:56
"Right," said Fred, "Both of us together
One each end and steady as we go."
Tried to shift it, couldn't even lift it
We was getting nowhere
And so we had a cuppa tea and

"Right," said Fred, "Give a shout for Charlie."
Up comes Charlie from the floor below.
After strainin', heavin' and complainin'
We was getting nowhere
And so we had a cuppa tea.

And Charlie had a think, and he thought we ought to take off all the handles
And the things wot held the candles.
But it did no good, well I never thought it would

"All right," said Fred, "Have to take the feet off
To get them feet off wouldn't take a mo."
Took its feet off, even took the seat off
Should have got us somewhere but no!
So Fred said, "Let's have another cuppa tea."
And we said, "right-o."

"Right," said Fred, "Have to take the door off
Need more space to shift the so-and-so."
Had bad twinges taking off the hinges
And it got us nowhere
And so we had a cuppa tea and

"Right," said Fred, "Have to take the wall down,
That there wall is gonna have to go."
Took the wall down, even with it all down
We was getting nowhere
And so we had a cuppa tea.

And Charlie had a think, and he said, "Look, Fred,
I got a sort of feelin'
If we remove the ceiling
With a rope or two we could drop the blighter through."

"All right," said Fred, climbing up a ladder
With his crowbar gave a mighty blow.
Was he in trouble, half a ton of rubble landed on the top of his dome.
So Charlie and me had another cuppa tea
And then we went home.

(I said to Charlie, "We'll just have to leave it
Standing on the landing, that's all
You see the trouble with Fred is, he's too hasty
You'll never get nowhere if you're too hasty.")
By:
Foinavon
When: 20 Jun 15 10:23
Could you imagine the French demolishing the Eiffel tower because it's going rusty?
The palace of Westminster is just as much a symbol of Britain,is part of our history,is much older than the Eiffel tower and attracts tourists. That it also serves an important purpose is a bonus.
Unthinkable that it could be allowed to become a ruin.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 20 Jun 15 10:46
Should restore everything from Fountains Abbey to Stonehenge by that logic. They're all tourist attractions and symbols of Britain.

I can believe the quoted costs and timescale. It cost me the best part of two years and 30 grand to restore a small 18th-century end-of-terrace that was crumbling owing to 20th-century cement render, gypsum plaster, insulation, damp-proofing etc. You simply can't do these things on an ad-hoc basis, or the problems such as damp in the unrepaired areas simply migrate to the restored ones
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Jun 15 12:46
^^^ using that comparison it should not cost much more that 3 million to repair.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com