ROYAL BABY WATCH

Jesus christ are the theonly ones in the world who have a baby?

Saya a lot about anyone that needs to look up to 2 individuals funded by the tax payer to make themselves and there lives feel better

YOu really have to have a emoty life to foucs on this

What a pillock you are TSO or given the circumstances maybe that should be Pilchard.

I see you avoided the quesiton,

Are they the only ones in the world who are going to have a baby?

Jesus christ if he wasnt a royal she wouldnt even look at him once

Is this watch like a Mickey Mouse one?

Is the clockface a picture of a tiny baby like baby Jesus, with grasping little hands and fingers.

And can you buy it from the same place as they do mugs?

How many do you want mem?

another scrounger pushed out into the world

Apr 24, 2015 -- 3:07PM, brendanuk1 wrote:

another scrounger pushed out into the world

Well said

What kind of a society has working people relying on foodb banks to feed their children while taxes fomr their wages go to the royal baby??

Whay are the porest working families in society contributing towards another family so they can live in comfort and riches?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHNfvJc99YY

Makes you proud.

@TSO No need to worry as it's only tax payers that contribute and your benefits are safe.

always strange how the samme people who love the royals are always the same people who hate people on benefits...oh the irony. These parasites are living in luxury because of mugs like you Akabula.

forelock tuggers the lot of them

JSA 57£  a week isnt it?? how much are the royals getting?? its a hard life going round the world shaking hands with mugs

Same old chyte from the usual suspects
Rules changed re funding of the Royal family. Educate yourselves.
You've plenty of time to do so between yer visits to the benefits office.

over enthusiatic rebuttal with smilie = irritated

What have I got to be irritated about. (notice how I avoided the laughing emoticon)
I just enjoy the anger that peep get when anything to do with the Royal Family is posted.
Feck all they can do about it. (I could resist no more)

not anger, just sadness, that people are so dumb

Never a truer word said. Refer to my first reply to TSO then ponder on the word pilchard.

The Royal Family don't impact on my life but as an institution I think they are an asset to the UK.
The finances were a mess but recent legislation curtailed the public purse payment to the Queen and her immediate family.
Given also that the Queen hands over 10 times as much from the Royal Estates income then it's not a bad deal.

2 royal coonts at Galipoli today in their navy uniforms dripping with medals, pathetic creatures

Apr 24, 2015 -- 6:20PM, brendanuk1 wrote:

2 royal coonts at Galipoli today in their navy uniforms dripping with medals, pathetic creatures

Well said

Still nothing to report although shopkeepers are seeing a rise in the sale of union flags.
You might want to get yours before they sell out.

Only a half wit or a troll would start a thread like this. tbf akabula may be brainwashed but he ain`t a half with so well done with the Pilchard

[img]http://images.onesite.com/community.betfair.com/user/themightymac/96e6f...

No TSO I've been too busy putting bunting up in our village to watch any tv.
Were gonna have a street party for the wee nipper when he comes plus I'm organising a collection for a present.
What a Pilchard you are.

fishing or not, some people actually queue up to wait for someone's baby to arrive, someone they don't know and have never met. that is just bizarre, and worrying

I think somebody needs to spell it out for TSO.
@sh We all remember the country in mourning for Di. I could never get my head round that.
It was sad but to grieve, sorry but no.

Apr 24, 2015 -- 7:34PM, akabula wrote:

I think somebody needs to spell it out for TSO. @sh We all remember the country in mourning for Di. I could never get my head round that.It was sad but to grieve, sorry but no.

are you being a hypocrite?

So you going to celebrate arrival of a baby of someone you dont know? Isnt that the same thing?

How many other babies will be born on the same day? or will it just be the "royal" baby

I guess none of the other babies boron on the same day as the "royal" baby will be of any significance to anyone because the only thing that matters is the "toyal" baby im sure the parents will celbrate the "royal" baby more than they do their own baby

I have to hand it to you TSO as thickos go you're in a league of your own.

Apr 24, 2015 -- 8:21PM, akabula wrote:

I have to hand it to you TSO as thickos go you're in a league of your own.

again you never address the point in question, cant give a straight answer to a straight question can you? Are you a politician?

A punter has bet £10,000 that the Duchess of Cambridge will give birth to a girl.

The man, in his late 30s and from Manchester, will collect more than £15,000 in winnings, which includes his original bet, if the royal baby is a princess.

Bookmakers Ladbrokes said the anonymous punter normally gambles on horse racing and football, and this is his first bet on the Royal Family.

The man said: "I'm not really bothered by the royals, but I'd just had a big win and my missus reckons it's a girl, so that's a good enough reason for me."

Ladbrokes set the odds of the baby, due any day now, being a girl at 8/15 and 11/8 for a boy. William and Kate's fourth wedding anniversary on Wednesday April 29 is now one of the favourite arrival dates at 4/1.

Alice remains the favourite girls' name at 5/4, while Charlotte is 5/1. Arthur is the favourite boys' name at 12/1 and James has odds of 20/1.

Ladbrokes took a 10 grand bet on a novelty market? I find that extremely hard to believe personally tictacman.

akabula stop winding the guy up over these leaches.

Wasnt Alice the queen mothers sister ,the one they locked away in a nut house ?

could easily be a mental case given the gene pool

sell the lot of them to canada - the australians won't want them

or maybe flog the lot to the usa.

Repuliicans wouldnt want them, clues in their name

No you are wrong - they fawn over these waste of spaces!!!

If you are right then we can do a bit of beheading.

Think of the boost to tourist revenue after that.

Oh dear. The Royal family don't actually cost that much these days and bring a lot to the country in terms of tourism.
I'm not that bothered but prefer it to a presidency.