Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
akabula
24 Apr 15 14:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 52,322 | Blogger: akabula's blog
Nothing to report as yet but will keep you informed as things progress.
I think we should start a 'just giving page' or whatever it's called so we can all contribute on the forum for a wee present.
I'm sure Facts will kick us off with a score or more.
I've got me Union Jack flag out of the wardrobe ready to wave.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 38
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 14:38
Jesus christ are the theonly ones in the world who have a baby?

Saya a lot about anyone that needs to look up to 2 individuals funded by the tax payer to make themselves and there lives feel better LaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh

YOu really have to have a emoty life to foucs on this
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 14:47
What a pillock you are TSO or given the circumstances maybe that should be Pilchard. Laugh
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 14:50
I see you avoided the quesiton,

Are they the only ones in the world who are going to have a baby?
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 14:51
Jesus christ if he wasnt a royal she wouldnt even look at him once
By:
mememe
When: 24 Apr 15 14:52
Is this watch like a Mickey Mouse one?

Is the clockface a picture of a tiny baby like baby Jesus, with grasping little hands and fingers.

And can you buy it from the same place as they do mugs?
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 15:01
How many do you want mem?
By:
brendanuk1
When: 24 Apr 15 15:07
another scrounger pushed out into the world
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 15:14

Apr 24, 2015 -- 3:07PM, brendanuk1 wrote:


another scrounger pushed out into the world


Well said

What kind of a society has working people relying on foodb banks to feed their children while taxes fomr their wages go to the royal baby??

Whay are the porest working families in society contributing towards another family so they can live in comfort and riches?

By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 15:19
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHNfvJc99YY

Makes you proud.

@TSO No need to worry as it's only tax payers that contribute and your benefits are safe.
By:
pandora1963
When: 24 Apr 15 15:21
always strange how the samme people who love the royals are always the same people who hate people on benefits...oh the irony. These parasites are living in luxury because of mugs like you Akabula.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 24 Apr 15 15:25
forelock tuggers the lot of them
By:
pandora1963
When: 24 Apr 15 15:27
JSA 57£  a week isnt it?? how much are the royals getting?? its a hard life going round the world shaking hands with mugs
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 15:28
Same old chyte from the usual suspects
Rules changed re funding of the Royal family. Educate yourselves.
You've plenty of time to do so between yer visits to the benefits office. Laugh
By:
brendanuk1
When: 24 Apr 15 15:37
over enthusiatic rebuttal with smilie = irritated Grin
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 15:53
What have I got to be irritated about. Happy (notice how I avoided the laughing emoticon)
I just enjoy the anger that peep get when anything to do with the Royal Family is posted.
Feck all they can do about it. Laugh (I could resist no more)
By:
brendanuk1
When: 24 Apr 15 15:54
not anger, just sadness, that people are so dumb
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 15:57
Never a truer word said. Refer to my first reply to TSO then ponder on the word pilchard.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 16:01
The Royal Family don't impact on my life but as an institution I think they are an asset to the UK.
The finances were a mess but recent legislation curtailed the public purse payment to the Queen and her immediate family.
Given also that the Queen hands over 10 times as much from the Royal Estates income then it's not a bad deal.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 24 Apr 15 18:20
2 royal coonts at Galipoli today in their navy uniforms dripping with medals, pathetic creatures
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 18:32

Apr 24, 2015 -- 6:20PM, brendanuk1 wrote:


2 royal coonts at Galipoli today in their navy uniforms dripping with medals, pathetic creatures


Well said

By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 19:02
Still nothing to report although shopkeepers are seeing a rise in the sale of union flags.
You might want to get yours before they sell out.
By:
themightymac
When: 24 Apr 15 19:08
Only a half wit or a troll would start a thread like this. tbf akabula may be brainwashed but he ain`t a half with so well done with the Pilchard LaughLaugh

[img]http://images.onesite.com/community.betfair.com/user/themightymac/96e6f2c1bbe8a4d7d800ef791557ca32.jpg?v=43200[/img]
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 19:12
No TSO I've been too busy putting bunting up in our village to watch any tv.
Were gonna have a street party for the wee nipper when he comes plus I'm organising a collection for a present.
What a Pilchard you are. Laugh
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 24 Apr 15 19:21
fishing or not, some people actually queue up to wait for someone's baby to arrive, someone they don't know and have never met. that is just bizarre, and worrying
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 19:34
Laugh
I think somebody needs to spell it out for TSO. Laugh
@sh We all remember the country in mourning for Di. I could never get my head round that.
It was sad but to grieve, sorry but no.
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 19:50

Apr 24, 2015 -- 7:34PM, akabula wrote:


I think somebody needs to spell it out for TSO. @sh We all remember the country in mourning for Di. I could never get my head round that.It was sad but to grieve, sorry but no.


are you being a hypocrite?

So you going to celebrate arrival of a baby of someone you dont know? Isnt that the same thing?

By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 19:54
How many other babies will be born on the same day? or will it just be the "royal" baby

I guess none of the other babies boron on the same day as the "royal" baby will be of any significance to anyone because the only thing that matters is the "toyal" baby LaughLaughLaugh im sure the parents will celbrate the "royal" baby more than they do their own baby LaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
akabula
When: 24 Apr 15 20:21
I have to hand it to you TSO as thickos go you're in a league of your own.
By:
The Special One™
When: 24 Apr 15 21:09

Apr 24, 2015 -- 8:21PM, akabula wrote:


I have to hand it to you TSO as thickos go you're in a league of your own.


again you never address the point in question, cant give a straight answer to a straight question can you? Are you a politician?

By:
tictacman1
When: 26 Apr 15 16:47
A punter has bet £10,000 that the Duchess of Cambridge will give birth to a girl.

The man, in his late 30s and from Manchester, will collect more than £15,000 in winnings, which includes his original bet, if the royal baby is a princess.

Bookmakers Ladbrokes said the anonymous punter normally gambles on horse racing and football, and this is his first bet on the Royal Family.

The man said: "I'm not really bothered by the royals, but I'd just had a big win and my missus reckons it's a girl, so that's a good enough reason for me."

Ladbrokes set the odds of the baby, due any day now, being a girl at 8/15 and 11/8 for a boy. William and Kate's fourth wedding anniversary on Wednesday April 29 is now one of the favourite arrival dates at 4/1.

Alice remains the favourite girls' name at 5/4, while Charlotte is 5/1. Arthur is the favourite boys' name at 12/1 and James has odds of 20/1.
By:
SlippyBlue
When: 26 Apr 15 17:10
Ladbrokes took a 10 grand bet on a novelty market? Laugh I find that extremely hard to believe personally tictacman.
By:
mobo
When: 26 Apr 15 18:10
akabula stop winding the guy up over these leaches.
By:
casemoney
When: 26 Apr 15 18:11
Wasnt Alice the queen mothers sister ,the one they locked away in a nut house ?
By:
brendanuk1
When: 26 Apr 15 18:45
could easily be a mental case given the gene pool
By:
mobo
When: 26 Apr 15 18:57
sell the lot of them to canada - the australians won't want them

or maybe flog the lot to the usa.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 26 Apr 15 18:59
Repuliicans wouldnt want them, clues in their name
By:
mobo
When: 26 Apr 15 19:02
No you are wrong - they fawn over these waste of spaces!!!

If you are right then we can do a bit of beheading.

Think of the boost to tourist revenue after that.
By:
akabula
When: 26 Apr 15 21:53
Oh dear. The Royal family don't actually cost that much these days and bring a lot to the country in terms of tourism.
I'm not that bothered but prefer it to a presidency.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com