I don't listen to any radio station.

It's very quiet in this room, I like it that way.

The luvvies like these people.

...." a good muslim, with british values "............

look - they are already in positions of influence and power

why do you think editorial decicions are  are made to exclude bad stories

they are in the labour party - deeply already

they control enclaves in some towns and cities

check who writes for the guardian but more importantly ,  their histor and what they think


you have no idea how deep in the doo doo you are

About time this had another airing...

The good Muslim.
Good meaning true believers—those who follow the teachings of Mohammed the Quran and the Sunnah to the letter, who try to emulate him in every way and are strict and pious Muslims. Since the teachings and examples of Muhammad are full of violence and terror the more one follows and emulates him the more radical one becomes. Muhammad raided and butchered people simply because they were not his followers. Good Muslims do the same. All the bombings and terrorism by Muslims are replicas of Mohammed's raids, or ghazwa, as he called them. Taking women as sex slaves, which the Islamic State and Boko Haram practice was also carried out by Muhammad and he sanctioned it in the Koran (33:50; 23: 1-6; 70:30; 4:24; 66:1-2). He ordered the assassination of his critics, stoning the adulterers, chopping off the hands of thieves and killing the Apostates. So, what we call terrorists are actually good Muslims.

The Bad Muslim.
These are Muslims who don’t practice their religion and are often ignorant of it. They may pray or chant the Koran, but they have no clue of its contents. They read it for thawab (reward) without understanding it. These Muslims are ordinary people we all know. Like everybody else, some are good and some are not so good. Some are friendly, but they see themselves as superior, by virtue of their faith, and of “higher morals.”

Morality in Islam is primarily about genitals and their use. For example, while having sex out of marriage is considered immoral, stoning people caught in such act is not immoral. While looking at bare arms and legs of Muslim women is considered immoral, raping non-Muslim women is not immoral. Homosexuality is immoral, but pedophilia is not.

These Muslims migrate to the west to better their lives, but they segregate themselves, form isolated communities and warn their children to not learn the ways of unbelievers or take them as friends unless they intent to convert them to Islam. They give huge amounts of money to charity. But Islamic charity has nothing to do with charity. All that money goes to build mosques, print Islamic materials and promote Islam. If any of that is spent for the needy, it is to enlist them for jihad or support the families of the suicide bombers. The bad Muslims are the lifeline of Islam and the breeding ground for good Muslims. All Muslim terrorists, unless they are converts, are born in and emerge from this group. Without the moral and financial support of the bad Muslims Islam will cease to exist.

Ugly Muslims.
As we learned the good Muslims are not good at all, and the bad ones are not really bad people, the ugly Muslims actually look beautiful. Islam is a world down the rabbit hole. Nothing is what it is because everything is what it is not. The ugly Muslims are clean-shaven, handsome or attractive, eloquent, articulate, and highly intelligent, just the kind of people you want to hang around with. They are journalists, professors, regular guests and contributors to mainstream media. They know what to say to gain your approval and your applause. They are charming. Their words are reassuring and their faces are familiar. You like them and trust them. So why do I call them ugly? Because they lie! Their job is to deceive you and to make you believe that the “real Islam” poses no threat to you. These wolves in sheep clothing are the most dangerous group. Deception is deadlier than terror. Do you fear more a ferocious animal that you can see or a deadly virus that you can’t? The enemy within is a lot more dangerous.

Unlike bad Muslims the ugly ones are not ignorant of their religion. They know of Muhammad’s raids, rapes, assassinations, genocides, tortures and beheadings, but they deny them, twist the facts and defend him. They accuse the good Muslims of having hijacked their religion of peace when they know they lie. They claim to be reformers when they know that Islam cannot be reformed. Islam is what it is. To reform Islam one has to change the Quran. Over 70% of it must be scrapped, and the other 30% is just sheer nonsense.

Reformers/Moderate

Reformer don’t want to change the Quran. They just want Muslims to practice it less. In theory it works. Even the deadliest poison in small doses is not lethal. But how can they convince all Muslims to not take their holy book seriously? This project is doomed from the start. This is either naiveté and wishful thinking, or a ruse to deceive the non-Muslims, to give them false hope so they can buy more time for Islam to take over the world, which is the goal of every Muslim, the good, the bad and the ugly.
The terrorist are born, raised and protected by the “moderates.” They are indistinguishable from each other. It is delusional to think that the non-terrorist Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. Where do the terrorists come from if not from the so-called moderate Muslims?

All Muslims support the ideology that wants to kill us. There are also good people (bad Muslims) among them, like al Sisi, who want to change this. They can’t, because the ideology against which they speak is Islam itself. They will likely be assassinated before they succeed. The belief that Islam can be reformed from within is wishful thinking. Other religions allow change and adapt with times. Islam is like a fossil. What is written in the Quran cannot be changed and the problem with Islam is the Quran.

Islam cannot be reformed, but it can be eradicated. It cannot be molded, but it can be smashed and pulverized. This cannot be done from within. Growth happens from within. But if you want to demolish a building you have to get out of it. You can’t cut a branch while sitting on it.

She certainly got her answer.

Perhaps the Guardian readers will comment later.

Put it on the politics forum for the attention of cryoftruth, who hates the Mail, and is suspected by quite few to also be northern lad.

I couldn't give two facks.

Remember, the daughter couldn't possibly have been radicalised at home or in the community. That's why the girls were immediately declared innocent without anything resembling an investigation, and wouldn't be facing any charges if and when they returned to the UK.

Well, well, well, who would have thought this?  (Apart from the 1.01 backers obviously).

.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/father-of-schoolgirl-who-joined-is-to-become-jihadi-bride-admits-he-took-her-on-protest-march-when-she-was-just-13-10158310.html

Haven't see shooting in the face on here for a while.

What about spaffing on her chebs?

He's too busy laughing his cóck off..

It is time to throw political correctness in the garbage where it belongs

Great lime Ms Gabriel.

MIKAEL the forums own nasty racist fascist speaks of shooting women in the face.....how very brave of you MIKAEL

Jesus wept, this evil b@stard was on his way across Europe to the UK without a passport

Get these borders closed again ffs.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3043233/Mother-girl-killed-Calais-Polish-drifter-way-Britain-reveals-saw-daughter-lying-ground-abducted-froze-fear-bundled-car.html