My my daughter needs to know how to work this math out.in a photograph the heights of 3 girls are 10cm, 9cm, and 7cm. The scale of the photo is 1:16 ,What is the real height of the tallest girl answer in metres.
Tallest Girl in Photo = 10 cm Multiply by Scale of Photo = 16 ... so real height is 10 x 16 = 160 cm
How can you not crack this poser is a mystery, I must say.
Tallest Girl in Photo = 10 cmMultiply by Scale of Photo = 16... so real height is 10 x 16 = 160 cmHow can you not crack this poser is a mystery, I must say.
I cannot believe how insensitively this gentleman has been treated on here. He was clearly brought up on imperial measurement and is struggling, as many of us older ones do, with getting the decimal point correctly placed when factoring up these minor decimal metrics. It is clear that the tallest young lady is almost exactly 52ft high. Hope this helps.
I cannot believe how insensitively this gentleman has been treated on here. He was clearly brought up on imperial measurement and is struggling, as many of us older ones do, with getting the decimal point correctly placed when factoring up these mino
There was an documentary a couple of years ago about how in ww2 they could work out the height of V2 rockets by looking at the shadow on aerial photos, knowing the angle the sun would be at that time of day and doing the maths. Get the kids working on that .
There was an documentary a couple of years ago about how in ww2 they could work out the height of V2 rockets by looking at the shadow on aerial photos, knowing the angle the sun would be at that time of day and doing the maths. Get the kids working o
There was an documentary a couple of years ago about how in ww2 they could work out the height of V2 rockets by looking at the shadow on aerial photos, knowing the angle the sun would be at that time of day and doing the maths. Get the kids working on that Laugh.
incredibly simple as well
Just Checking • March 23, 2015 10:44 PM GMT There was an documentary a couple of years ago about how in ww2 they could work out the height of V2 rockets by looking at the shadow on aerial photos, knowing the angle the sun would be at that time of
Ebulgery. It's not all simple, really. It's not a simple matter of a bit of trig. The problem is that you don't know the actual length of the shadow either. The apparent size of the shadow depends upon the camera specifics and the altitude of the aircraft carrying the camera.
One thing they used to look for, specifically, was cricket pitches. You could easily detect the wicket zones which were always 22yds apart and so they could scale things directly. I didn't know that the Germans even played cricket!
Ebulgery. It's not all simple, really. It's not a simple matter of a bit of trig. The problem is that you don't know the actual length of the shadow either. The apparent size of the shadow depends upon the camera specifics and the altitude of the air
I was assuming the plane had an altitude meter, it knows it's own height above the ground, the angle of the sun from that the length of the shadow can be deduced and thus height of rocket, basic trig
still I thought I was being clever get the answer to the OP problem
I was assuming the plane had an altitude meter, it knows it's own height above the ground, the angle of the sunfrom that the length of the shadow can be deduced and thus height of rocket, basic trigstill I thought I was being clever get the answer to
Actually I am not so sure about that now Naydam, the shadow, a long time since I was at school I will think about it later, more important stuff, now this afternoon's greyhounds
Actually I am not so sure about that now Naydam, the shadow, a long time since I was at schoolI will think about it later, more important stuff, now this afternoon's greyhounds
You need the altitude, the geographical location, the camera characteristics (focal length, I think), the time of day and the apparent length of the shadow. Oh, and a pencil and a bit of paper!
AND those Log tables that you threw out years ago!
You need the altitude, the geographical location, the camera characteristics (focal length, I think), the time of day and the apparent length of the shadow. Oh, and a pencil and a bit of paper! AND those Log tables that you threw out years ago!
And if they weren't all in a straight line as well, then it affects the answer, because it's a lot more difficult.
You need to know Pythagoras like the back of you hand to work it out properly, or do like I do when selecting a lay bet, take Pi as being 22/7 (and don't worry about the square root of -1 ... ignore it for the purposes of this question).
Were the 3 girls straight A students?And if they weren't all in a straight line as well, then it affects the answer, because it's a lot more difficult.You need to know Pythagoras like the back of you hand to work it out properly, or do like I do when