|
By:
Russel brand just mentioned this vile individual on comic relief implying that this vile individual would be against donating any charity to the most needy in Africa
Now that's what I call a vile individual |
|
By:
Hallelujah!! I'm in total agreement with TSO>
Yes Russell Brand is a vile individual. |
|
By:
TSO. I think your post was a little bit ambiguous...would you care to enlarge upon who is meant by 'vile individual'?
|
|
By:
Russell Brand speaks the truth
Nigel Farage tells lies Hth. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I couldn't understand it, either. It was badly worded. No point in being insulting.
|
|
By:
How much money from his millions has Russell Brand donated to Africa by the way?
Brand is a communist. He made his fortune out of capitalism and now he's become a communist. Communists don't donate to poor countries. One reason is because under communism they usually end up as poor as the countries that need help. |
|
By:
The Special One coming on here and quoting Russell Brand.
Why doesn't that surprise me? |
|
By:
Did anyone else watch tvguide.co.uk/detail/2106102/106368385/quelle-catastrophe-france-with-robert-peston#.VQQTpblya1s on BBC2 last night?
"The journalist investigates how economic stagnation is threatening France's way of life and could also undermine the European Union. In the wake of the financial crash of 2008, the French shunned austerity and voted in a left-wing president who promised tax rises and a continuation of high public spending, but now Francois Hollande has had to perform a U-turn, leading to a surge in support for Marine Le Pen's Front National and its anti-EU agenda." An eye-opening programme and if I lived / voted in France, I would most certainly be voting for "Marineland." |
|
By:
Here is the direct link ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b055kqhw/this-world-quelle-catastrophe-france-with-robert-peston
Well worth watching if you missed it! |
|
By:
Thankfully anybody rational who may have originally been sat on the fence will know exactly which way to jump having seen The Special Needs One and Pandora in the same corner. There hasn't been a tag team like them since Gormless Clown and Harridan Harperson.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Man may invent a flying boat. But it doesn't mean he'll let a fly out of the window.
Unless it's early in the morning and one has become ten. Yep next ![]() |
|
By:
That's just what I was gonna say...I think.
![]() |
|
By:
Brand rents his property in London at great cost compared to ordinary people.
His landlord was outed recently as having the rental company registered abroad where he can pay less tax. Brand had no comment to make on that. |
|
By:
Russell Brand a latter day Gary Glitter.
|
|
By:
...with a Rolf Harris look about him.
|
|
By:
It is reassuring when you see a great campaigning newspaper like the Sun, renowned for its fights against privilege and poverty, pointing out yet another injustice or example of wrongdoing on the part of Britain’s elite….
As intros go, that doesn’t even begin to match the contorted, dishonest rhetoric booming from this week’s Sun headlines, excoriating comedian and activist, Russell Brand for the temerity of supporting the residents of the New Era estate in their protest against its sale to US private equity firm, Westbrook Partners, and their demands for affordable housing. Again, the paper has shown itself in its usual, unpleasant colours, and demonstrated, yet again, the contempt with which it treats its readers. Russell Brand is not everyone’s cup of tea but few could disagree that this is ludicrous. Brand has been accused of hypocrisy because firstly, he lives in an expensive flat and secondly, his landlord may engage in forms of tax avoidance. The Sun is not the first to have suggested that there is something problematic about a campaign for affordable housing being supported by a millionaire who, in his own words, can ‘blessedly’ afford his rent. Channel 4’s Paraic O’Brien, also chose to focus on this rather than the campaign, a tack Brand, rightly, described as ‘snide.’ These arguments assume that any individual like Brand should be barred from showing solidarity with those less well off unless they choose, in Franciscan fashion, to dispense with all trapping of wealth and take a vow of poverty. One could, I suppose, be uncharitable and impugn the motives of well-paid tabloid editors and broadcast journalists in advocating such stances but why lower oneself? We know Brand is a successful, wealthy individual. How has he done it? Well, not tapping phones or spinning lies about Liverpool supporters, rather by writing books, telling jokes and being a performer. Does the fact that he is popular or has made money from being an entertainer disqualify him from expressing egalitarian sentiments, holding radical opinions or showing solidarity with those less lucky than himself? I don’t see why. Brand is known to contribute his time and money to campaigns, although he chooses not to shout about the latter. He does stress the importance he places in paying the proper rate of tax. It’s quite clear that the activists in these campaigns welcome his support. The Sun’s claims regarding his landlord’s tax affairs are both bizarre and dishonest. Why should Brand know anything of his landlord’s tax affairs and what relevance would it have anyway? Is he supposed to do an audit before renting a property? It’s not his tax affairs that are under question here, rather someone to whom he pays rent. Great logic there. The only self-serving, chiselling hypocrites who have cause for shame here are those responsible for commissioning and writing the article at the Sun. The real scandal is not the behaviour of Brand but that we lack a press that is prepared to campaign as forcefully for affordable housing and the conditions of working people. The solution to that lies in regulation to prevent media concentration and to ensure genuine plurality of provision. Then we might have some alternative to the cynical and manipulative coverage and editorialising shown by so much of our current mainstream media. |
|
By:
Brand will be the first 0ne-percenter to be strung up when the revolution comes
![]() |
|
By:
Will Wallace and Gromit do the deal with Wendolene AND Preston?
|
|
By:
Poly bot
Congrats. on a hat trick of infantile posts. |
|
By:
Russell is a rich, white man who clearly hates blacks.
|
|
By:
Further congrats. on being an absolute tw@t
|
|
By:
Oh I see, you attack the one who points out the racist while defending the rich white racist.
You must be thrilled with Brand's hatred of women, which he freely admits to. |
|
By:
Point me in the direction of such evidence
|
|
By:
It's in the general direction of your nose.
|
|
By:
In the October 2014 issue of Vanity Fair, Brand said of the allegations of misogyny made against him: "I have lived a life and had a frame of cultural references that make that charge quite legitimate..."
|
|
By:
Russell Brand is the last guy you'd want promoting anything.
Full of his own importance and struggles to express himself when out of his comfort zone. |
|
By:
Facts 15 Mar 15 03:55
It is reassuring when you see a great campaigning newspaper like the Sun, renowned for its fights against privilege and poverty, pointing out yet another injustice or example of wrongdoing on the part of Britain’s elite…. As intros go, that doesn’t even begin to match the contorted, dishonest rhetoric booming from this week’s Sun headlines, excoriating comedian and activist, Russell Brand for the temerity of supporting the residents of the New Era estate in their protest against its sale to US private equity firm, Westbrook Partners, and their demands for affordable housing. Again, the paper has shown itself in its usual, unpleasant colours, and demonstrated, yet again, the contempt with which it treats its readers. Russell Brand is not everyone’s cup of tea but few could disagree that this is ludicrous. Brand has been accused of hypocrisy because firstly, he lives in an expensive flat and secondly, his landlord may engage in forms of tax avoidance. The Sun is not the first to have suggested that there is something problematic about a campaign for affordable housing being supported by a millionaire who, in his own words, can ‘blessedly’ afford his rent. Channel 4’s Paraic O’Brien, also chose to focus on this rather than the campaign, a tack Brand, rightly, described as ‘snide.’ These arguments assume that any individual like Brand should be barred from showing solidarity with those less well off unless they choose, in Franciscan fashion, to dispense with all trapping of wealth and take a vow of poverty. One could, I suppose, be uncharitable and impugn the motives of well-paid tabloid editors and broadcast journalists in advocating such stances but why lower oneself? We know Brand is a successful, wealthy individual. How has he done it? Well, not tapping phones or spinning lies about Liverpool supporters, rather by writing books, telling jokes and being a performer. Does the fact that he is popular or has made money from being an entertainer disqualify him from expressing egalitarian sentiments, holding radical opinions or showing solidarity with those less lucky than himself? I don’t see why. Brand is known to contribute his time and money to campaigns, although he chooses not to shout about the latter. He does stress the importance he places in paying the proper rate of tax. It’s quite clear that the activists in these campaigns welcome his support. The Sun’s claims regarding his landlord’s tax affairs are both bizarre and dishonest. Why should Brand know anything of his landlord’s tax affairs and what relevance would it have anyway? Is he supposed to do an audit before renting a property? It’s not his tax affairs that are under question here, rather someone to whom he pays rent. Great logic there. The only self-serving, chiselling hypocrites who have cause for shame here are those responsible for commissioning and writing the article at the Sun. The real scandal is not the behaviour of Brand but that we lack a press that is prepared to campaign as forcefully for affordable housing and the conditions of working people. The solution to that lies in regulation to prevent media concentration and to ensure genuine plurality of provision. Then we might have some alternative to the cynical and manipulative coverage and editorialising shown by so much of our current mainstream media. (A belated) Parklife |
|
By:
I think a lot of people are simply overawed by Brand's personality without the slightest inclination of what he would do to change things for the better.
He speaks gobbledegook so that he can't be nailed down on specific details. The one thing that is clear from his ranting is that he is against the capitalist system we have in place. The very system that is funding the generous welfare state that this country enjoys. He seeks to destroy the goose that lays the golden egg. |
|
By:
Having first availed himself of a few golden eggs!
|
|
By:
I hope farage land comes soon before we are overwhelmed with sh!t,sharia,fgm,and the rest of the cultural enhancements nobody voted for.
|