Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
HansUlrichApfelStrudel
11 Feb 15 21:04
Joined:
Date Joined: 16 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 3,204 | Blogger: HansUlrichApfelStrudel's blog
A man out celebrating his stag in Dublin has avoided a jail term for hitting another man in the face with a glass.

Karl Harffy (34) was in Howl at the Moon on Merrion Square when Ronan Flood accidentally bumped into him. Harffy first punched the man in the face before hitting him a second time with a glass.

The court heard that while Mr Flood (24) only sustained small cuts which were closed with paper stitches, there were concerns that his eye could have been damaged.

He was seen at the Eye and Ear Hospital where it was confirmed that no shards of glass had penetrated his eye.

Harffy was nominated as a suspect after a barman who witnessed the assault pointed him out to gardaí. He later told gardaí in interview that the victim was aggressive and confrontational.

He claimed he had acted in self defence and that Mr Flood and his friends had been provoking him.

Harffy, who is originally from Manchester, but now living in Kintyre Park, Ballymena, pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to assault causing harm on December 1, 2013. He has no previous convictions.

Judge Martin Nolan sentenced Harffy to two years, suspended in full and ordered him to pay €3,000 to the victim with 18 months.

He said “being drunk is no excuse, if you’re drunk you’re responsible




I seem to remember a court case in England recently wear a guy was convicted of rape because a woman was deemed too drunk to be responsible for her actions.


Are the laws in Ireland completely different from rest of British isles?
Pause Switch to Standard View Calling Brtisher Islanders: Court...
Show More
Loading...
Report Foinavon February 11, 2015 9:22 PM GMT
We Britishers like your Apfel Strudel Herr Oberst.
Report guinness2dear February 11, 2015 9:58 PM GMT
Mancs eh..
Report akabula February 11, 2015 10:11 PM GMT
My prediction is that ebul will agree with the judge. Wink
Report guinness2dear February 11, 2015 10:20 PM GMT
Naydam was the judge..
Report ebulGery February 11, 2015 10:22 PM GMT
Correct akabula
Report treetop February 11, 2015 10:26 PM GMT
Men are discriminated against in our supposedly tolerant country now. The wimmin would lynch anyone who even suggested that lady was responsible for anything more than an afterthought.
Report ebulGery February 11, 2015 10:30 PM GMT
trueSad
Report kincsem February 11, 2015 10:41 PM GMT
British Isles?
Britain and Ireland.
Report akabula February 11, 2015 10:44 PM GMT
Surely the British isles includes Ireland.
Did when I was at school.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- February 11, 2015 10:47 PM GMT
So Irish men can just take advantage of drunk women ?
Report guinness2dear February 11, 2015 10:48 PM GMT
You must have gone to school before 1922 then..
Report akabula February 11, 2015 10:54 PM GMT
Nope. Just googled it and it defines The British isles as a group of islands consisting of the islands of Great Britain, Ireland and over 6000 smaller islands.
Report guinness2dear February 11, 2015 10:57 PM GMT
Have a read of this then.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles_naming_dispute
Report akabula February 11, 2015 11:03 PM GMT
I hadn't seen that before. It was wiki that I referred to as well. Laugh
Reading it though I think it is a more recent development than 1922 as there is a reference to 2003.
Seems a bit petty either way though.
Report guinness2dear February 11, 2015 11:04 PM GMT
Aye, couldn't give a flying fook myself being a mule..
Report akabula February 11, 2015 11:08 PM GMT
Actually remembering back we always referred to it as the British Isles (ie Ireland included) but it was The United Kingdom and Northern Ireland rather than just The United Kingdom which to my mind would have included NI anyway.
No wonder foreigners are confused.
Report blackbarn February 11, 2015 11:11 PM GMT
Seems obvious that this case was judged under Irish law

Judge says being drunk is no excuse for committing a crime.  This is obvious isn't it?

OP suggests that this is similar to a rape victim contributing to being the victim of rape by being too drunk to be responsible for her (their) actions. This is boll ocks isn't it?

Did I miss something obvious?
Report ebulGery February 11, 2015 11:14 PM GMT
Why is it bollocks?

We are either responsible for our own actions when we are drunk or we are not

We cannot have it both ways

I think we are responsible, this includes women
Report akabula February 11, 2015 11:15 PM GMT
I know a man that's going to take you to task for that post. Laugh
Report akabula February 11, 2015 11:15 PM GMT
Laugh Was typing that as you posted ebul.
Report ebulGery February 11, 2015 11:16 PM GMT
Laugh you know me too well
Report blackbarn February 11, 2015 11:28 PM GMT
Gosh, Ebulgery, didn't expect a net so soonLaughLaugh, even from you. But in case you hadn't noticed this is not a gender issue. the diffence (and in law too) is a difference is between perpetrator and victim.  In crude terms (especially for youWink) for the former it is no defence and for the latter it is no justification. Some differenceCryCry
Report ebulGery February 12, 2015 11:21 AM GMT
I disputed the use of the word victim, in the latter case

Still I argued it all out once on the football forum...got little support

Modern men will believe what they want to believe, in fact what women tell them to believe
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com