Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
HansUlrichApfelStrudel
11 Feb 15 21:04
Joined:
Date Joined: 16 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 3,204 | Blogger: HansUlrichApfelStrudel's blog
A man out celebrating his stag in Dublin has avoided a jail term for hitting another man in the face with a glass.

Karl Harffy (34) was in Howl at the Moon on Merrion Square when Ronan Flood accidentally bumped into him. Harffy first punched the man in the face before hitting him a second time with a glass.

The court heard that while Mr Flood (24) only sustained small cuts which were closed with paper stitches, there were concerns that his eye could have been damaged.

He was seen at the Eye and Ear Hospital where it was confirmed that no shards of glass had penetrated his eye.

Harffy was nominated as a suspect after a barman who witnessed the assault pointed him out to gardaí. He later told gardaí in interview that the victim was aggressive and confrontational.

He claimed he had acted in self defence and that Mr Flood and his friends had been provoking him.

Harffy, who is originally from Manchester, but now living in Kintyre Park, Ballymena, pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to assault causing harm on December 1, 2013. He has no previous convictions.

Judge Martin Nolan sentenced Harffy to two years, suspended in full and ordered him to pay €3,000 to the victim with 18 months.

He said “being drunk is no excuse, if you’re drunk you’re responsible




I seem to remember a court case in England recently wear a guy was convicted of rape because a woman was deemed too drunk to be responsible for her actions.


Are the laws in Ireland completely different from rest of British isles?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 23
By:
Foinavon
When: 11 Feb 15 21:22
We Britishers like your Apfel Strudel Herr Oberst.
By:
guinness2dear
When: 11 Feb 15 21:58
Mancs eh..
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 22:11
My prediction is that ebul will agree with the judge. Wink
By:
guinness2dear
When: 11 Feb 15 22:20
Naydam was the judge..
By:
ebulGery
When: 11 Feb 15 22:22
Correct akabula
By:
treetop
When: 11 Feb 15 22:26
Men are discriminated against in our supposedly tolerant country now. The wimmin would lynch anyone who even suggested that lady was responsible for anything more than an afterthought.
By:
ebulGery
When: 11 Feb 15 22:30
trueSad
By:
kincsem
When: 11 Feb 15 22:41
British Isles?
Britain and Ireland.
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 22:44
Surely the British isles includes Ireland.
Did when I was at school.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 11 Feb 15 22:47
So Irish men can just take advantage of drunk women ?
By:
guinness2dear
When: 11 Feb 15 22:48
You must have gone to school before 1922 then..
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 22:54
Nope. Just googled it and it defines The British isles as a group of islands consisting of the islands of Great Britain, Ireland and over 6000 smaller islands.
By:
guinness2dear
When: 11 Feb 15 22:57
Have a read of this then.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles_naming_dispute
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 23:03
I hadn't seen that before. It was wiki that I referred to as well. Laugh
Reading it though I think it is a more recent development than 1922 as there is a reference to 2003.
Seems a bit petty either way though.
By:
guinness2dear
When: 11 Feb 15 23:04
Aye, couldn't give a flying fook myself being a mule..
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 23:08
Actually remembering back we always referred to it as the British Isles (ie Ireland included) but it was The United Kingdom and Northern Ireland rather than just The United Kingdom which to my mind would have included NI anyway.
No wonder foreigners are confused.
By:
blackbarn
When: 11 Feb 15 23:11
Seems obvious that this case was judged under Irish law

Judge says being drunk is no excuse for committing a crime.  This is obvious isn't it?

OP suggests that this is similar to a rape victim contributing to being the victim of rape by being too drunk to be responsible for her (their) actions. This is boll ocks isn't it?

Did I miss something obvious?
By:
ebulGery
When: 11 Feb 15 23:14
Why is it bollocks?

We are either responsible for our own actions when we are drunk or we are not

We cannot have it both ways

I think we are responsible, this includes women
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 23:15
I know a man that's going to take you to task for that post. Laugh
By:
akabula
When: 11 Feb 15 23:15
Laugh Was typing that as you posted ebul.
By:
ebulGery
When: 11 Feb 15 23:16
Laugh you know me too well
By:
blackbarn
When: 11 Feb 15 23:28
Gosh, Ebulgery, didn't expect a net so soonLaughLaugh, even from you. But in case you hadn't noticed this is not a gender issue. the diffence (and in law too) is a difference is between perpetrator and victim.  In crude terms (especially for youWink) for the former it is no defence and for the latter it is no justification. Some differenceCryCry
By:
ebulGery
When: 12 Feb 15 11:21
I disputed the use of the word victim, in the latter case

Still I argued it all out once on the football forum...got little support

Modern men will believe what they want to believe, in fact what women tell them to believe
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com