|
By:
Why should they??????
We attacked Middle Eastern countries, why should they stop anything, we are the cause of this ourselves? Lee Rigby we see as an ordinary person, he is not responsible for what our govenrments do I think there is a difference |
|
By:
Do you actually read and understand what you type?
You said 'The (co-ordinated) planned campaign stopped because of the public outcry over Lee Rigby's murder.' I asked you why they didn't stop after 9/11 and 7/7, as there was a HUGE public outcry over that. And then you posted 'Why should they?' |
|
By:
I'm still trying to work out why 'coordinated' should be taken to mean 'at the same time'. I think the original use of the word was pretty accurate. The idea might have been wrong because, in my opinion, that was an isolated event. But, of course, that is just my opinion.
Also, the poster said that he 'thought that' it could have been an aborted campaign...he didn't say it as a statement of fact. CMAT is misquoting there. While we're here, I feel that I must point out that, unless the other poster was actually in charge of these terrorist activities, he would be highly unlikely to know WHY they didn't stop their attacks after 9/11 or 7/7. I believe he is innocent and, therefore, unable to answer such a leading question. I would suggest that 'no comment' would be appropriate. ![]() |
|
By:
ok naydam
no comment ![]() |
|
By:
It's a bit like that channel 4 programme, '24 hours in police custody' or summat. That's what THEY all say. Tell 'em nowt!
![]() |
|
By:
naydam 12 Nov 14 02:29
While we're here, I feel that I must point out that, unless the other poster was actually in charge of these terrorist activities, he would be highly unlikely to know WHY they didn't stop their attacks after 9/11 or 7/7. I believe he is innocent and, therefore, unable to answer such a leading question. I would suggest that 'no comment' would be appropriate. Yet you seem to know WHY they stopped after the murder of Lee Rigby. |
|
By:
Henry II would have been well over 200 in 1381
![]() Richard II perhaps ? |
|
By:
Had a look at their local paper after reading this monstrous racist crime(I presume it is the lead story on the News channels).
The place sounds like a war zone , I could not see one story that was not about some terrible crime. I would regard the attacking of a decorated veteran as a treasonable crime ....no doubt deprivation , lack of opportunites , cultural sensitivity to blame. |
|
By:
..deprived neighbourhood, vulnerable, disadvantaged etc.
The retired soldier should be embarrassed he's created such a fuss. Send him on a diversity course forthwith! |
|
By:
Mikael d'H. Why WHO stopped? And WHAT did they stop? Gizza clue for crying out loud!
![]() |
|
By:
salmon spray • November 12, 2014 10:06 AM GMT
Henry II would have been well over 200 in 1381 Confused Richard II perhaps ? erm yes ...apologiesI was thinking Richard II, amazing I often type something and I end up with different words than I was intending?????? |
|
By:
Not one of our better Kings, after a good start seemed to go insane, ending up being starved to death in a castle somewhere
Henry 'Bolingbroke' seized power and declared himself Henry IV |
|
By:
ebulGery 13 Nov 14 12:12
I often type something and I end up with different words than I was intending?????? You don't think we've noticed? |
|
By:
naydam 13 Nov 14 00:43
Mikael d'H. Why WHO stopped? And WHAT did they stop? Gizza clue for crying out loud! Apologies naydam, I had your post mixed up ebulGery's! |
|
By:
You don't think we've noticed? Mikael
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I have.
|
|
By:
No prob. M d'H. At least it makes sense now.
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
A 15yr old boy and another 16, both from Keighley, have been arrested in connection with the incident and have been released on bail, West Yorkshire Police said yesterday.
|
|
By:
birch imo
|
|
By:
Animal Aid would get involved and make it rubber
|
|
By:
Bradford paper blames bnp for having an opinion
|
|
By:
Naturally.
|