|
By:
They certainly ain't paupers now.
Very lucrative this whole "business". |
|
By:
I can barely read these threads anymore, the moralising is too nauseating, too many perfect parents never having made a mistake,
. You can't make the same mistake twice. The second time you make it, it's no longer a mistake. It's a choice. In the McCanns' case it seems they made the wrong choice every night. |
|
By:
All of which plays nicely with the abduction theory of which there is zero evidence.
|
|
By:
Any more holidays booked before Christmas?
I suspect a suspect that is very suspicious will suspiciously appear very soon... |
|
By:
regular check ups but not when she was crying at been left alone,as upstairs said,unless of course the macaans new she was upset but carried on partying instead
maybe some progress on the westminster paedo inquiry might flush someone out |
|
By:
There have only ever been one suspect in this case
But not evidence to implicate them or clear them of course Our police seems to have uncovered FA |
|
By:
I can barely read these threads anymore, the moralising is too nauseating, too many perfect parents never having made a mistake, until a dead body is found they will always be innocent
Unbelievable post given the facts that we know about their behaviour both before and after Maddies disappearance. Taxi's post yesterday at 21.58 sums it up perfectly for me. And I find it incredible that you talk of 'perfect parents'. Nothing to do with being perfect, it's simply being responsible parents. |
|
By:
unless of course the macaans new she was upset but carried on partying instead
this is exactly what happened .http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/1584584/Madeleine-McCann-complained-to-mother-Kate-about-being-left-crying-alone.html |
|
By:
or at least what they claim happened
|
|
By:
They left their kids alone, they did wrong and nobody disputes that, but not one person can come up with any plausible argument for them having something to do with her disappearance, we already know she was last seen by a member of the public at 6, to have died and then conjured up a plan to hide her body in 3 hours, and do it without detection with the world attention is highly unlikely, it goes against all natural instincts when a child has died to even think like that, it just seems to be posters on this thread and in public just want to keep repeating themselves about what bad parent they were, using them as a punchbag to make themselves feel better, what is the point in keep saying "they were out on the lash", how does that help other than to almost validate the fact the chances are they weren't involved at all, their behaviour and routine were consistent, as for the cadaver smell, she was in contact with dead bodies prior to the trip, and only found on her cloths, not gerry's, and some may also say those dogs were being directed to bark in that video at certain points
|
|
By:
mmm So why dont they take a "lie detector test" come on the telly answer ALL questions........caus I would
Id do anything for my child THEN THE WHOLE NATION WOULD BE BEHIND THEM why the spoof.................... |
|
By:
scandinavian_haven
you have more faith in them than the Pope does. All matters relating to the child were taken down from the Vatican website. |
|
By:
scandinavian_haven the problem is that they are bad parents so why defend them?
|
|
By:
A reaction to unfounded rumours, a PR exercise, who cares about popes in 2014, back in the real world there is still no motive, no body, only amateur sleuths like that saddo geordie who actually went over there to film his own documentary, I'm not saying that they have nothing to do with it, but there is ZERO hard evidence.
|
|
By:
There is also ZERO hard evidence of an abduction.
|
|
By:
I am inclined to agree with you Taxi
Perhaps people have trouble condemning them because they are 'middle class'..doctors? There is something about their behaviour that disturbs me, does not entirely ring true, but cannot put my finger on it????? Everybody is entitled to their opinion though Hope the truth comes out in time, and we don't have to wait as long as the Ripper murders |
|
By:
If it does, there is going to be some police bill
|
|
By:
Our police are still out there
|
|
By:
Scandanavian_haven. I'm afraid the other posters can't hear your voice of calm wisdom. They are a snarling, baying pack and their blood is up. I fear that nothing short of gladiatorial action will appease them.
I, myself, have have experienced their terrier-like tactics for being a 'McCann Apologist' when, in reality, I have never said anything other than to point out problems with their 'prosecution' evidence. The fact that no charges have, as yet, been made would indicate that any 'evidence' against them is unworthy of admittance in a court of law. Indeed, there is no evidence of an abduction, either. All very unsatisfactory. |
|
By:
we already know she was last seen by a member of the public at 6,
which member of the public ? not David Payne , the gaspar statement guy , surely ![]() |
|
By:
C5 Now.. they look as guilty as fck.
|
|
By:
@naydam Like you, and everyone else on here, I don't know what happened on that night other than the mccanns were irresponsible and selfish in leaving their 3 kids alone and not for the first time.
Because of their actions Maddie has suffered and yet neither of them has really expressed any sorry for that without trying to excuse their behaviour. That is what angers me about them. Well that and the fact that the press have given them an easy time. BTW I don't subscribe to the theory that all of the Tapas crowd were involved somehow as I'm sure that at least one of them would have broken ranks by now. |
|
By:
As usual, with C5 expose type programmes full of controversy, there's no substance, nothing new, states the ' bleeding obvious' and ends with no conclusion/ opinion. A waste of space.
|
|
By:
mary nightingale thinks mrs maccan is a beautiful woman ,1st time ive heard that one and must admit not something thats ever crossed my mind, not even in a ratty,mearcat way
|
|
By:
akabula
@naydam Like you, and everyone else on here, I don't know what happened on that night other than the mccanns were irresponsible and selfish in leaving their 3 kids alone and not for the first time. Because of their actions Maddie has suffered and yet neither of them has really expressed any sorry for that without trying to excuse their behaviour. very well put akabula I think that is why they are disliked Naydam is looking past this, seeing the pain of losing a child fair enough but before the McCanns start showing some remorse most of us cannot |
|
By:
Robert Murat back in the frame today, have they really run out of fresh bogeymen?
|
|
By:
ebulgery, who cares if you have sympathy for them or not, this is about guilt, and theirs can't be proven only circumstantial, end of thread.
|
|
By:
I bet it's not
|
|
By:
![]() so far scandanavian? still if it takes as long as Jack the Ripper to solve this, they should ok do you not think it is about child care either?????? |
|
By:
The McCann sympathisers can't prove she was abducted.
The other side of the fence can't prove she was murdered. Whichever side you sit on, the McCanns behaviour was most odd. Should the police go back and check UNDER the bed...just in case. |
|
By:
There is nothing new to add, nothing, the ground has been worn out, never has one topic gone around in circles as much as this one, until new evidence appears, it's over.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Should the police go back and check UNDER the bed...just in case.
![]() you could have cracked it there Taxi |
|
By:
The British Police went out there a long while ago and were 'close' to arresting a suspect.
What happened to that story? |
|
By:
scandanavian_haven 19 Nov 14 12:41
There is nothing new to add, nothing, the ground has been worn out, never has one topic gone around in circles as much as this one, until new evidence appears, it's over. Yes, most be so distressing and disappointing for the apologists that there are still people out there concerned about the disappearance of a little girl. Must also be music to the ears of the apologists that the "abduction theory" is constantly trotted out. |
|
By:
*must
|
|
By:
What do you mean by 'apologists'?
|
|
By:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/apologist?searchDictCode=all
|
|
By:
Thank you, Wesdaq. I never realised that it's a proper word. Accurate too. I noted several synonyms but NO antonyms. Unusual, I thought. What word would accurately describe somebody who in offence (as opposed to defence) of something controversial?
|
|
By:
shrewd
|