they are not bets they are emails which are easily doctored or you could have typed out loads of combinations if you were devious

Grimsters
     13 Mar 15 20:28   

not douting you have winning days but you never admit loosing days as i said tother day  15 picks  3 winners  6/1  3/1  2/1 and an aftertimed f/c and tricast  1300 quid lose on placepots and you said you had a winning day, please explain this


This is the last time I'm going to reply to your drivel,that day I did a preview there were 4 winners not three infact I had small bets on the three other winners,if you read the write up it says I could see the first three fighting out the finish.On form and times they were clear of that fied,i backed them all ew all placed winner 6/1 the fcast paid £26 and had the trifecta 15x paid £88 plus I had two other ews at 12s placed and a fcast,the first race had put me in profit even if I didn't have another winner!!The write up was self explanatory as the rest of the card was poor value even though styill made profit on it,you read the rest of the card I never gave a postitve preview on any other race bar the first it was basically just filling the write up baeed on first race.

and emails posted to who knows are not bets anyone can type them out in loads of combis

what sort of idiot lays out £1300 on a meeting he says he doesent fancy much only YOU  any mug can do 20,000 lines for 5p and kop one now and then

i noticed even puntersmaters didnt comment on your f/cs and tricast bollix or ppot disaster  tother week there to polite get over yourself everyone knows you aftertme like no other ,goodnight im of out, some of us have got a social life

Backed it at 6/1 pumph,i'd be surprised of the rest of them will ever win a race thought it had only had the two c/d runs the previous run was fsstest by some way compasred to the rest of the field over that trip,was the only backable horse in the race.If Philip prince hadn't given the firs one such a poor ride that would've won as well franking the form,its all about prices probably the only time it will ever be a bet was when it drifted to 6/1...

If you really wanted to improve your profits,the way to do it is study times and learn to adjust them at the weights if you could take time to learn it you'd increase your returns 10 fold you'd also cut out a lot of losing bets as you'd know how slow some are relative to ratings even though you may think they are big prices.
I take every race on the aw and write all best or put their last 3/4 runs down trying to get an average times by each runner when doing the form,then taking into account draws pace look at prices,cracking example was tonight you see the bet I did anniversaire 8/1 and smugglers point 8/1 had the best times in race and beating of fav 1,2 not by much but 4x the price.The fcast paid £47 had it to a few quid but those 3 were clear of the field that was just one example tonight,the hodges runner in the first and snow dancer similarly plus indian affair with tsarglas kicking myself didn't back the pair in the last now or at least in multiple.

The thing about aw horses if they can produce a decent time,they invariably will do it again 90% of the to follows I note are based on times so I know if they reproduce that run they will win.Thats the point of keeping them noted,as they may run on wrong surface,wrong trip I've had to follows that i've had to wait a year for ideal conditions,lots of them are avoidable because of prices its just like having a better formbook to hand.Pehaps a lot of them will never be value but at least I know what they are capable of doing and you can have horses that tell you they have a stone in hand just based on a time.There's been loads on the to follows winjing lately I've only backed the ones that have drifted,thus no bets on puntersmate as a lot of them opened short,i have virtually stopped posting on forums again now anyway.

I post on there but not that often but someone who posts on the betfair forum took exception because I posted under another name, he thought that was so out of order he trolls me over here now

Typical bookies using others to create a book as they are totally clueless, it does happen I know that for a fact going back years ago from spread betting.

I have no problem with Banter, or taking people to task over things like aftertiming etc but when it gets personal or is just plain trolling for the sake of it then its got out of hand.

Taunting someone about ill health is nothing short of disgusting, you really should not put yourself through it to be honest, you don't need the grief & if you thought about it you don't need the attention if its bringing you a load more grief.

They are lucky I don't know who they are,as they'd get a right hammering if I did..

Goodnight fella.

Wolverhampton (AW) Result
30 Jan 2015
« 7:15 DAILY PRICE BOOSTS AT UNIBET HANDICAP (TAPETA)
(Class 5) (0-75, 4yo+) (5f20y) 5f Standard
£2,975.74, £885.50, £442.52, £221.26


« 1 2 Pensax Lad (IRE) 7/2J 4 9-7 Ronald Harris 75 * *
Ben Curtis


« 2 4 4 Arctic Lynx (IRE) 11/2 8 9-0 p Conor Dore 68 * *
Hayley Turner


« 3 7 nk Lady Ibrox 10/1 5 9-5 t Alan Brown 73 * *
Dale Swift


« 4 5 ½ Black Dave (IRE) 9/2 5 8-9 David Evans 63 * *
J F Egan


« 5 6 3¼ Captain Whoosh (IRE) 7/2J 4 9-2 John Quinn 70 * *
Joe Fanning


« 6 8 1 Scoreline 12/1 4 8-10 David O'Meara 71 * *
Josh Doyle7


« 7 3 ½ Rise To Glory (IRE) 28/1 7 8-5 Shaun Harris 66 * *
Kevin Lundie7


« 8 1 2 Lucy Parsons (IRE) 6/1 4 9-5 David Barron 73 * *
Graham Gibbons



Pensax lad

Wold be hard not to be impressed with pensax lad,4l winner tonight but looked even better than that win very impressive visually probably out of these class 5s this season the only sprinter I've seen that may go on to better things,hardly anything makes all at wolves and although this race was weak for the grade he did look completely different class.
The fact he is so versatile looks natural from the front and won off the pace at lingfield last time out and equally looked as good on both surfaces has even won at swell previously as well,he was eyecatcher penultimate run when badly hampered and has won twice since,he's going to get a big hike after this around the mid 80s wouldn't really interest me if higher than 85 so hopefully will be around that mark.
The other interesting thing was the time only .05 slower than when boom the groom was off 86 carrying 8-12 won over 5fs here back in November yet carrying 9n pound more and as seen tonight hacking up,there are very few progressive sprinters around on the aw around these marks and ron harris has had a poor season but he is good with these sprinters and could be running in the higher class sprints at the end of april...
8 ran TIME 1m 0.30s (fast by 0.20s)

This is an example of a horse that's run a monster time and disappointed twice since but at lingfield,he's off 85 I'd be interested to see where he is at the end of the season the time alone and ease of win he has to be better than an 85 horse.

The one's with mental problems are the ones using 8 different addys from the same isps to look in on the forums absolute looney tunes,just to see what I've posted and that was just over two days.Onethefence and his goons from whitley bay..

thegiggilo
     12 Mar 15 01:46   









Southwell (AW) Result
10 Mar 2015
« 5:05 » CORAL.CO.UK HANDICAP
(Class 5) (0-75, 4yo+) 1m4f Standard
£3,234.50, £962.50, £481.00, £240.50


« 1 6 Tacticus (USA) 2/1F 4 9-4 p Lady Cecil 74 * *
Martin Harley


« 2 3 9 Royal Peculiar 11/2 7 9-7 p Michael Appleby 75 * *
Andrew Mullen


« 3 7 6 Caged Lightning (IRE) 50/1 5 8-13 p Steve Gollings 67 * *
Jimmy Quinn


« 4 1 3 Le Deluge (FR) 9/4 5 8-7 t Heather Dalton 66 * *
Shirley Teasdale5


« 5 4 10 Carlanda (FR) 11/2 5 8-11 h Michael Appleby 70 * *
Alistair Rawlinson5


« 6 2 5 Cascadia (IRE) 16/1 4 7-12extra weight6over weight3 p Alison Hutchinson 61 * *
Aaron Jones7


« 7 5 69 Steuben (GER) 11/1 9 9-3 p Des Donovan 71 * *
Shane Kelly


7 ran TIME 2m 36.91s (slow by 1.91s)

Tacitus

Nice performance by 74 rated colt with just 6 lifetime runs,did not look particularly well handicapped from turf and poly form but this looked a really poor race,he looks a very interesting runner to me winning by 9ls could've been nearer 20 and still produced a respectable time in a canter.
The most interesting thing is he looks purely dirt horse,sire ap indy top class sire out of seattle slew on dirt and what Julie cecil does with this horse in future presume he will come back to swell and he maybe one of those rare horses that progresses so much he might be seen abroad in future.He's going to take a big hike for this and it maybe his future lies over further,the fact ap indy has such good progeny on dirt but in Europe very poor on turf majkes the placing even more interesting.


WWWWWWWAAALLLLLLLOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!Hope you got the 4/5 should've been 1/100

Hi Jockey


Think nowadays its more about how often you beat the SP
Several people have come on to say they have had half a dozen bets no winners but closed or restricted because the SP is shorter.
Your betting pattens will soon come under review unless your doing loads of multiples forecasts etc, of course some firms are worse than others BS  will close you down after one bet if your not there type of punter.
If your shrewd you are unlikely to last long.

...the reason they gave in the email mentioned "betting patterns".

I wouldn't call myself shrewd; I was just looking at Oddschecker. If a firm is prepared to offer a standout price, why complain when you take it?

think it should be a matter for a regulatory body if a bookie refuses one person a price and then gives that same price to another person.

they can cry traders decision etc but it makes no sense if they still offer the price to another person.
its descriminatory.