Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 275 comments are related to the topic:
SIR CLIFF....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 6 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 275
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Aug 14 23:03
Emden  • August 15, 2014 10:36 PM BST
es, sadly wasted on Sir Cliff, I mean he could have porked his way through half the female of this country
and that is why wondered about him


yes that is a point, I thought it was because he was gay, but did not want to lose his female fans
and being gay was not accepted so much then...unless you were outrageously camp like Kenneth Williams
people can laugh at it then

well I really hope it is not kiddies, we shall see
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Aug 14 23:29
I am sure some females like yeahyeah are looking in on this thread, and thinking what a sad lot us men are
with out somewhat shallow values with women

We bring our problems on ourselvesCry

but I am still maintaining we don't do kiddies as much as is suggested by our media and court cases
on that last remark, I do realise I am going against majority opinion on hereSad
By:
Al Dente
When: 16 Aug 14 01:21
As a "senior citizen"  I am amazed that the old biddies that I fancied 50 yrs ago are defending Kitty. Crazy
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 16 Aug 14 01:46
Again to add a historical perspective there were strong political groups at the heart of the political cass seemingly hell bent on free love for children in the 70's. They were even affiliated with the Labour party with many existing leading politicians even now bending over backwards distancing themselves from their actions or lack of them in the 70's. Lib Dems? Think David Steele's knowledge and appalling slihtering over fatty Cyril. And the Tories. Where do you start? At least nost of them got a penchant for it when they were buggered at school so they were also victims as well sometime as being perpetrators.

No wonder the rest of us wince a bit at the thought of one up the pipe and detest the thought of kiddy fiddling. There are probably plenty of people still out there in positions of power hoping this all dies down and wondering what the big deal is.

One up the bum. Too much harm done.
By:
Ron-Russian
When: 16 Aug 14 22:16
is it coincidence his 1961 album was called the young ones & his
2010 album was called bold as brass (ie thinking he'd got away with it)

& if you take 1961 from 2010 it leaves 49, which was age cliff was when the offence took place!
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Aug 14 22:33
You can all forget about it,an expert on law on sky says that Sir Cliff would not be able to get a fair trial if he was charged,because of all that has been written about him since his name was mentioned in the media.looks like we will all have to put up with Sir CLIFF for another 50 years,a new book,30 more number ones and a pile of millions from the state."the rich ones,darling weer the rich ones"
By:
gmt
When: 16 Aug 14 22:36
I have no idea if he is guilty of anything at this point and the police have to be given time to develop the case. I have two concerns with what has happened to date though. Firstly I think the public should be given an indication of the substance of the evidence that led to a judge signing a warrant to search his home, I would hate to think its simply one person making an allegation that has led to this. I tend to like the way the Americans deal with warrants for searches or arrest, they have to have a clear and measured level of evidence before an arrest or search can be made. And my second concern is why has this case not being heavily reported on the media, whilst I agree at this stage it shouldn't, I cant help thinking that because he is a Knight of the realm and a friend of the BBC that this has effected the reporting on the matter. In the other Yew tree cases there was a media scramble to report on everything and anything about the person involved, with Sir Cliff almost nothing. Where is the consistency?
By:
MisterBadger
When: 16 Aug 14 22:40
it was bad enough that we had to put up with bowyer and woodgate ffs  Cry
By:
MisterBadger
When: 16 Aug 14 22:41
^ @brassneck
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Aug 14 22:43
Maybe the guy is clean as a whistle.?and the woop woop woop woop,got it wrong.
By:
EvgenyKissin
When: 16 Aug 14 22:45
Did Sir Cliff ever have horses in training with Sir Henry Cecil?
By:
Howdi
When: 16 Aug 14 22:47
may have done Evgengy, he wasn't alone.
By:
no moves
When: 16 Aug 14 22:49
"if you take 1961 from 2010 it leaves 49, which was age cliff was when the offence took place!"

The alleged offence took place in 1985 he was born 1940.
By:
Howdi
When: 16 Aug 14 22:50
bang goes that theory Laugh
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Aug 14 22:51
You can not give a persons name out in law until they are charged.And as far as I know the guys name is Harry Webb.so that will take a few days to sort out.Someone somewhere made a big big blunder.
By:
EvgenyKissin
When: 16 Aug 14 23:00
Thanks Howdi - they may have run up the Doncaster straight.
By:
Facts
When: 16 Aug 14 23:02
Red Riding !
By:
MisterBadger
When: 16 Aug 14 23:10
^ was one of the best things on tv in the last decade imo
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Aug 14 23:11
When mr glitters house was raided all evidence was not allowed to be used in court because in law he is Paul Francis Gadd,and mr.glitter was compensated for the error by the state.Bottom line on my point is that Sir Cliffs name should not have been Released by the police and the chances of a trial are about 2% if mr.webb is charged
By:
thegiggilo
When: 16 Aug 14 23:16
He's one of the ''untouchables'' zero chance of getting charged knows far to many in the inner circle,the whole thing looks a fiasco to me for him to slink into obscurity....Shocked
By:
EvgenyKissin
When: 16 Aug 14 23:19
I remember him getting very excited on Grand National day in 2004. I think he, d backed the Tabor-owned mare who won and whose name now escapes me.
By:
Dobbo
When: 16 Aug 14 23:21
I wouldn't  be surprised if he is truly celibate.He is a strange cove and I don't reckon sex has figured much in his life. just an opinion but I don't believe there will be any substance in these allegations.
By:
MisterBadger
When: 16 Aug 14 23:22
sir clifford of the richard gambling... are you shure?  Shocked
By:
EvgenyKissin
When: 16 Aug 14 23:31
Well all I remember MB was him punching the air when that Tabor horse won. Whether he had a bet is another matter.
By:
ebulGery
When: 16 Aug 14 23:36
no probability about it really
on account of protection of our children
By:
ebulGery
When: 16 Aug 14 23:39
Still we see women taking their chances in Yewtree
so it appears a few men are going to try their luck here as well

amazing one claim, others immediately follow
By:
ebulGery
When: 16 Aug 14 23:45
interesting on the red button today

a women is charged with suffocating her baby by lying on him
yesterday a women was arrested for negligence and possible murder, of her three year old child in a swimming people

very little publicity, no public anger

and yet if a case involves sex, a celebrity and happened about 30 - 40 years ago
we are all up I arms

why is that?
By:
Dobbo
When: 16 Aug 14 23:50
The first two are almost certainly due  to the overreaction of the authorities and their "partners" and will  come to nothing. If that is wrong then outrage comes later .
By:
thegiggilo
When: 16 Aug 14 23:50
Paedophile Information Exchange

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE)


Formation
1974

Extinction
1984

Headquarters
London

Region served
UK

Official language
English

The Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) was a British pro-paedophile activist group, founded in October 1974 and officially disbanded in 1984


Government funding[edit]

In March 2014 evidence emerged that PIE had received grants totalling £70,000 from the Home OfficeShocked, after a whistle-blower told police he witnessed a successful three-year grant renewal application for £35,000 in 1980Shocked, implying that a similar grant had been made in 1977Shocked
By:
MisterBadger
When: 17 Aug 14 00:12
gery, have you not heard of the paedophile information exchange?

actually I was there, as we did not live in a society of mass paedophilia

well as luck would have it I was there too and I remember it being reported about extensively in the early 80s... dr rhodes boyson being one of the most infamous members of this group:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/westminster-abuse-inquiry-i-found-rent-boys-to-entertain-top-tory-politicians-in-the-1980s-claims-former-party-activist-9602754.html

do you have selective memory problems gery, or are you just simply genuinely ignorant?
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Aug 14 00:53
or are you just simply genuinely ignorant? our truce simply did not last longLaugh

Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE)

how am I supposed to know about that????
I never saw the Daily Paedophile Gazette on sale?????
It was not delivered to peoples doors as a free newspaper

This is being exaggerating out of all proportion
I still say we are rewriting history
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Aug 14 00:59
Facts..Red Riding

one of the best drama series I have seen in recent years
but I did have a little trouble with plot

Would the police have covered up paedophile activities to the extent they did
even when child murder was involved?

Although yes I am sure the police covered up for a lot, Police corruption has and probably still is
a problem for us
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Aug 14 01:07
I suppose a organization like Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) could have existed
if fact it did

I never heard of it, nobody I ever knew had heard of it, and I find it difficult to believe
that all our government were members

I assume rent boys are legal if of age?...they are male prostitutes..prostitution is not illegal
By:
Al Dente
When: 17 Aug 14 19:13
PIE was pretty well known after the Sunday People brought it to the attention of the general public in 1975. http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/the-vilest-men-in-britain-25-5-75/
Affiiated to the NCCL, it still haunts Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt. PIE did have taxpayers money to help it along, at least 30,000 pounds apparantly.
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Aug 14 19:39
oh well...I missed it

I think I used to buy The News Of The World for the juicy bitsBlush

I sometimes think this is what this Historical Sex abuse is really about

Perhaps we should have just kept the News Of The World...oh well Sad
By:
brassneck
When: 17 Aug 14 19:58
Now then listen to this.the police got a call from the bbc saying"we know you are going to raid Sir Cliffs house.The police thought that because the bbc knew this it was safe to release Sir Cliffs name.(they presumed that everybody knew)But the BBC had not told anybody.SO the police are at fault.Now in law the State has to protect itself.SO if there are no charges taken against Sir Cliff the state is doing its job of protecting itself.now im not saying Sir Cliff is innocent or guilty of any charges but can you understand that the state will not want to get involved in a trial that indirectly will be caused by an error by the state itself.AND the brittish justice system is There to protect the state .So the advice from the state justice representitives will be to drop the whole case in order to protect the state.
By:
Al Dente
When: 17 Aug 14 21:33
The release of Sir Cliff's name was deliberate in an effort to stop any investigation and thus protect the guilty party or parties; they are the only ones to gain from such a breach of confidence. I suggest that either 1.Politicians wanted it stopped and used the compliant BBC, or 2. Old Bill was naive regarding the actions of the BBC or complicit.
By:
dewey
When: 17 Aug 14 21:36
Can't we give this a rest?...........who cares anyway?
By:
MisterBadger
When: 17 Aug 14 21:44
apologies gery, too much beer - my first for a few weeks, so probably had a disproportionate effect  Sad

that notwithstanding, the PIE was in the news very recently re its affiliation to the then National Council for Civil Liberties (now Liberty)
By:
MisterBadger
When: 17 Aug 14 21:47
^ back in the 70s and 80s when future labour stars Harriet Harman and Patricia Hewitt were leading members
Page 6 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com