Facts    15 Aug 14 14:43 
The Guardian - of course

blackbarn    15 Aug 14 21:32 
Take your pick, but lets start with the one I replied to.  9pm

You start with a preposition you know to be untrue.

I would then assume then, that the sales figures are the highest of all the UK daily newspapers.
Is that a fact?

I don't know it to be untrue.

If you read enough of my posts you'd see that I can't remember the last time I purchased a daily newspaper, but it's certainly not this century.

If, as he says, the Guardian is the ONLY newspaper that tells the truth, surely it SHOULD have the largest circulation. Unless the vast majority of the UK newspaper readers don't want the truth, and prefer the lies in any other paper they buy.

You end with a question that you do not know the answer to and you know that the person you are addressing it to doesnt know either.
One wonders what the fkin point is

The chances of me reading the on-line Guardian site are zero. He's much more likely to read it. It was a fair question.

If he KNOWS the Mail is a scum racist  rag, why does he read it?

For example: I haven't read the holy bible since my schooldays. I would assume the quo'ran, which I've never laid eyes on, falls under the same category, they are both full of crap. As an adult I chose not to read them at all.

How can someone who relies so heavily on the veracity of the Newham Recorder (which I happen to know is a very sound organ) possibly think, or even consider the possibility that the Guardian could have the highest circulation of "all the daily newspapers"?

Methinks the poster doth protest to much, or is that "I am pretending to be much dimmer than I really am".

Re the "I am told" point.  What on earth has your reply below to do with your original post. You have been told something, which if true would be disturbing and interesting, but what do you do with this preposition?. You ask someone who like you wouldn't have the faintest idea whether it was true of not, if it is true. If you think its true, do some fkin research, or even ask the Guardian to get a denial? as a starting point for a good debate on here.

Re the "I am told" point.  What on earth has your reply below to do with your original post. You have been told something, which if true would be disturbing and interesting, but what do you do with this preposition?. You ask someone who like you wouldn't have the faintest idea whether it was true of not, if it is true. If you think its true, do some fkin research, or even ask the Guardian to get a denial? as a starting point for a good debate on here.

Ask the Guardian?

If I wanted to, it would be easier to look at their website.

I was told on the politics forum, as well as this one, that the Guardian closes its comment boxes when the crime is committed by a black or an asian. Why would they lie when it could easily be proved wrong?

I would guess that given the chance to prove that this was lies, some would have jumped on it. But nobody has ever called them liara. So I believed them.

How can someone who relies so heavily on the veracity of the Newham Recorder (which I happen to know is a very sound organ) possibly think, or even consider the possibility that the Guardian could have the highest circulation of "all the daily newspapers"?

It seems you know that it isn't.

What is the highest selling daily newspaper in the UK then?

FWIW, when I used to buy papers I took the Sporting Life and the Daily Mirror. When the DM started to resemble the Sun, I stopped buying it, and never got any other paper to replace it. 

BTW, I've had posts pulled by mods on here for reporting the Newham Recorder crime pages. I was accused of being racist for not reporting enough crime by indigenous whites, and reporting every black and asian crime.

Every crime I posted  had an internet link.

And once you got to the crime pages you could see I was posting all the news. It just shows that a lot of people know absolutely fack all about the place, but are content to call anybody who reports the crime as a racist. 

If I had once lived in Hull, where I was told on here that there are a minimal number of blacks and asians, and reported all the crime, would that be considered racist, as all the suspects and criminals would be white?

The court heard that, apart from Honc, all the other defendants have long criminal records in their home country, with 32 convictions between them.
Pawlowicz has also been convicted in the UK for a raft of offences including sexual assault and affray.

Lights blue touch paper...steps back...

Your country has been stolen from you without a shot being fired.

I've just seen him on the news, I've never seen a face so badly bruised.

Scum

Miss cmat summary

She's spit of welfare tourism and ethnic diversity

i only just learnt tonight that it seems the border authorities are clueless as to past criminal records of foreign travellers.

if it wasnt so frightening it would be laughable. on another point am i right in thinking these scumbags still havent explained if it was

a case of mistaken identity or not.???  this seems way over the top for a robbery, ffs they even had a flamethrower in the car.!!