I have no idea what news pages you are on about. If I go online to see the BBC news, I would go to the website indicated in the link supplied earlier.
This, it seems is different to the one the 'regional news pages'. I don't know what they are or where they are located.

Is that the Luke Fitzgerald affair? If it is, then yes, the earliest news reports DID indicate a football related incident. But that was because of witness statements from people who genuinely believed that! At that time NOBODY had pieced together that it originated with some entirely unrelated scuffle between two youths earlier in the day. The proper story came to light much later on.

NOBODY (except the black gang) knew anything about the actual cause of events. They were NOT misreporting it!
This is just paranoia.

If you view the BBC video report for the Luke Fitzgerald case on that page, there is no mention at all of a 20 strong black gang attacking the pub with weapons.

They probably interviewed a dozen who said it was committed by blacks, but only show whites who said it 'got a bit rowdy' and didn't mention the ethnicity of the gang at all.

The BBC have described them as 'probably Polish'.

Not on the BBC television news pages they haven't, it's on my screen at the moment, there is no description at all.

We do indeed.

BBC hides anti-white Race Murder

We have come to expect the BBC to systematically distort the news to fit its narrative of an essentially anti-black, anti-Muslim ‘racist’ British, particularly English, society, and no effort is seemingly spared to highlight examples of white ‘racism’ whenever it occurs and often when it doesn’t. The BBC is eager to construe more or less any innocuous remark as ‘racist’ if it deems such a remark to be anything less than celebratory of multiethnic multicultural ‘diversity’. However, over the past three days its reporting has hit a new low in its coverage of the brutal stabbing and subsequent death of a young man named Luke Fitzpatrick in a Dollis Hill pub – the Ox and Gate – last Saturday.

Reading the BBC reports on its website and listening to its accompanying video, you could be forgiven for thinking that this fatality was the consequence of things turning “nasty” and “rowdy” amongst a group of drunken football fans – white football fans – in a London pub. The only interviewees chosen for the video were white, and the reporter stated:

    “Police have arrested three people so far. Two teenage boys and a man in his thirties.” He continued: “A night of celebration, turned to tragedy.”

There was no mention of the ethnicity of those arrested or what form the violence took. All three reports from Sunday, Monday and today were tailored in such a way as to make this tragic death look like a ‘typical’ consequence of the innate violence associated with a certain type of English football fan. As can be seen from the following extract, this bias in its report is undeniable:

    The victims were found close to The Ox and Gate pub, where several people had gathered to watch the Champions League final on TV.

    An eyewitness who was inside the pub told BBC London that as fans celebrated Chelsea's win things turned "rowdy and nasty", resulting in some damage both inside and outside the pub.

    It is believed the victims were father and son and the stabbing took place after trouble started in the pub.

We turn to The Daily Mail on the other hand and discover what really happened. This was no brawl between tanked up football hooligans, this was a mass anti-white race attack perpetrated by a gang of 20 hooded blacks who burst into the pub, killed Luke Fitzpatrick and stabbed his father. The Mail writes:

    The pair were attacked when a gang armed with bats and knives stormed the north London pub after father and son had watched Chelsea win the cup together at on Saturday.

    'I was there on Saturday and it was like something out of a horror film.

    'There were about 20 young black guys all with their hoods up armed with sticks and bats and knives. They just ran in the pub and started trying to attack people.

    'It was really frightening. But it should not have happened to Luke, it shouldn’t have happened to anyone, but he was a complete innocent.'

Why did the BBC omit all of this terrifying and highly salient detail? For what reason could it have ignored the identity of the attackers and the fact that they stormed the pub en masse armed with lethal weapons? This was no brawl between drunken football fans; this was an organised anti-white race attack. The BBC has some explaining to do, for its treatment of this crime, as in its willingness to claim that organised Pakistani Muslim paedophilia has nothing to do with the cultural background of the perpetrators, illustrates its intrinsic anti-white anti-indigenous bias. The BBC is institutionally racist: it is anti-white, but more specifically, anti-English. Have you had enough of this? A video of the biased BBC report is shown below, in which a completely distorted politically correct vision of this brutal murder is presented for public consumption. The BBC should be held to account for such wilful misrepresentation.

Will you please stop posting OTHER people's comments, and ex[press some of your own. It is impossible to have a discussion with some body who simply replies with somebody else's opinion, plucked from God knows where.

Stop beating about the bush, both of you, and tell me EXACTLY what you think occurred that day. From start to finish. IN YOUR OWN WORDS!

What on earth is "The media would be" supposed go mean?! Some of them might be. Some of them might not. Stick to facts of 'what is' and not fanciful ideas of how YOU think it would be IF.....

Correct^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Always amusing to see the usual suspects having a good Alf Garnet style seethe.

What article made the most front page news:

A 20 strong gang of hooded blacks with weapons who attacked a pub full of white football fans, which resulted in death.

(Have it your way Naydam, it wasn't racist)

or

(neither was this then)

The murder of Stephen Lawrence.

It is not just a minor thing how these things are reported. It
is essential to our freedoms.

I would also recommend that you consider what constitutes a 'racist crime'.

Easy, when a black or asian is attacked by a white person.

Pretty arrogant, and delusional to think that just because the world has "moved on"
things are necessarily any better..or even different.

Keep it up Alf Garnet

I was at work honest guv

and when i first moved out this way
it made the front page if a bike got stolen

This has got to be The best one yet by the BBC

Christopher Adeji 
from Ramsgate, did a runner from Canterbury Crown Court, Kent, just before he was due to appear on an attempted rape charge.

Members of the public who see Adjei are not advised to approach him, but to contact Kent Police.

Okay then, sounds like a dangerous facker. Tell us what he looks like?



? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?  ? ? ?

The BBC 'forgot' to include this:

'Adjei is described as a stocky black man, with dark hair.'

You couldn't make it up

The BBC have seen the light.

A woman on a train from London to Birmingham, she woke at Leighton Buzzard to find a man sexually assaulting her. She challenged him, but he ignored her.

She then demanded that he let her out of her seat, which he did.

The woman left the train at Milton Keynes and alerted police.

Officers met the train at Rugby station but could not find anyone matching the description of the man.

The man is described as Asian and in his forties.

Sgt Summerfield said: “We are keen to speak to anyone on the train who witnessed this incident or believes they have any information which could help our investigation. I am particularly interested in talking to two women who sat opposite the victim prior to the assault. One of the women had a laptop,the other was reading a book. Both got off the train at Leighton Buzzard."

Sitting opposite and never said a word????!?!?!?!?!

Perhaps they were afraid of being labelled 'racist'?