|
By:
Not read the replies because Mc Moonbeam is surely one of the biggest trolls on here from past stuff that I've seen of his and from the thread title. Sad.
|
|
By:
*thread title should read his opening post.
|
|
By:
The Beatles were the first group. Before there were solo artists like
Presley or groups with a lead singer and backing band, the first to share vocals and have more than one songwriter. Everything was self-contained within the group, this had never really been done before and became the expected blueprint for future American and English groups. |
|
By:
STUDYFORM 05 May 14 21:48
Many many bands since have modelled themselves on the Beatles (ELO, Oasis and nearly every other band whilst learning/practising) and you won't often hear any musician say a bad word about their music. About as savage an indictment of the Beatles as I've ever read. Dobbo 05 May 14 23:26 I didn't much care for the Beatles and still dont.I accept they were talented but I cant see them as the greatest band of all time.Cant say I bother much either about intricate chord patterns and original intros. I want to hear some rock and roll not call in at the local music academy. I was born in 1950 but the Beatles were just wallpaper in my life. I knew of them of course and even owned a copy of MMT which was given to me as a present. But like lots of my contemparies I was listening to Chuck Berry, Leadbelly, Muddy Waters, and of course the Rolling Stones - if the Beatles wrote a better song than Paint it Black that so summed up the moment I missed it.I saw Dylan early in the sixties and concluded he was so far ahead of anyone else he would do for me. Can the Beatles match Like a Rolling Stone? Of course not. Later came Led Zep, Van Morrison, Velvet Underground and many many more that in my view made the Beatles look even more like the popsters that they really were.It seems to me they sit more easily besides Abba than they do jimi Hendrix. Great post. |
|
By:
It seems to me the whole ‘Beatles were a pop band, not very good, unlike [insert band of choice], who were great’, would make more sense if the bands in question weren’t often so obviously influenced by (or even happy to copy or cover) them.
Would a cool psychedelic guitar pioneer like the mentioned Jimi Hendrix have gone to the trouble of learning Sgt Pepper’s so he could perform it live the day it came out if they were the equivalent of The Monkees in terms of credibility? He performed other Beatles’ songs too. And while on the Monkees, there is really very little difference between a song like I Wanna Be Free, sung by cute Davy Jones and The Velvet Underground’s Sunday Morning, sung by Lou Reid, or Femme Fetale, sung by Nico. The VU were a pop band, with verses and choruses (“It’s all versus and choruses, innit”, as Jimmy Page once said) like any other pop band. One of the interesting things about The Doors and The Velvet Underground is that while they have gained a mystical cool status over the years, their early demos show that the former were influenced by straight lounge jazz and the other by straight country blues. The lyrics of course set the Velvets apart and yes the Beatles at times look very poor in comparison, but so does Led Zeppelin’s backwards-looking and faintly ridiculous writing and posturing and the whole prog/heavy rock lyric writing that followed. Paint it Black is terrific – would this be the one with sitar, like The Beatles’ Norwegian Wood a year before? The Beatles had started writing comedy songs, they said, and this was one. What did Keith Richards say about Paint it Black next year? Ah, it was a comedy song (also with a sitar). So whatever moment-defining importance you think it has, it was just a joke song to them. Norwegian Wood, part 2 interms of ideas and instrumentation. Listen to the Rolling Stones’ Child of the Moon. Not only does its melody derive from the Beatles’ Rain (a year before), it even contrasts ‘rain’ and ‘sun’ in the lyrics. It’s basically a stylistic copy. You see this in hundreds of songs, album covers, lyrics, engineering techniques and so on. You can say today the Beatles were only a pop band but there's very little evidence that many of their contemporaries really thought that way. |
|
By:
Watching the tribute now, hard going in places to be honest, just reached Yellow Submarine with the crowd lapping it up
![]() |
|
By:
You have of course picked the silliest song in the whole of their repertoire, pumpy.
|
|
By:
1 billion record sales. That's billion with a B, and rising all the time.
There must be an awful lot of gullible people about if they weren't that good. |
|
By:
Good post FlowerMyth, the single most important thing in popular music,
and the most difficult is can you write a song. The Beatles were pioneers in this and made it the expected norm, not an unusual thing, and this lead to all groups in the 60s and 70s having to be able to this. It meant that suddenly anyone, with little or no musical training, could form a band and all of these bands would produce new music. This lead to an incredibly productive time for music. It was a golden era. |
|
By:
From their first hit (Love Me Do) late 1962 - they were only making records for just over 7 years - thus began the greatest 7 year run in music history.
|
|
By:
"There must be an awful lot of gullible people about if they weren't that good".Hit the nail on the head there Kenny.The pop music "industry" relies on this gullibility.
|
|
By:
"and the most difficult is can you write a song." Most of their songs were on the same level as nursery rhymes.
|
|
By:
So to sum up.The Beatles.Poor singers,poor musicians,poor songwriters - but,in the right place at the right time,with the right image , good management and a gullible general public = ££££££££££££££.
|
|
By:
The difference is artie that The Beatles have been selling records for over 50 years. Gullibility has a shelf life whereby artists are imposed on us with all the hype but they rarely last more than a year or two.
Most people in the music business quote The Beatles as a great influence, surely they can't all be wrong. |
|
By:
artie is Derek Thompson. Talks out of his asre.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
I spent quite a few days in Derek Thomson's company Kenny. My company used him for shop openings and I would be charged with collecting him at the airport and taking him to various units. Was normally a 9 to 5 thing and involved a fair bit of travel so he was in my car for anything from 2 to 4 hours. He was okay to be honest, really friendly unlike McCririck who I also ran about.
|
|
By:
Maybe so akabula, but he's robbed a lot of people over the years with his dreadful tipping service.
|
|
By:
I paid for his service and posted his bets on General Betting several years ago. Gerry did all the spouting (he was very good at that) We had a lot of fun.
|
|
By:
What's gullible about buying records that you like to listen to.
A lot of pretentious claptrap written here. |
|
By:
McRirick asked Thomson once on The Morning Line:
'What is your maximum stake for yourself when you advise a 'maximum bet' on your phone tipping service?' Thommo said 'I'm a family man, I don't go mad.' McRirick asked him again 'Don't beat about the bush, what is your maximum stake?' The answer was 'Ten quid. I've got children.' |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Its amazing how a thread can divert from its original topic, were be talking about Panyan pickle next !!!
|
|
By:
Branston's for me.
|
|
By:
lol class Taxi.
|
|
By:
Looks like taxi has posted on the wrong thread. Silly old fool
![]() |
|
By:
There is only one person on the wrong thread here
|
|
By:
read higher up crags.
|
|
By:
"Most people in the music business quote The Beatles as a great influence, surely they can't all be wrong." Most people in the music business know the correct thing to say to keep the general public on their side.What they really think is another matter.
|
|
By:
I first heard the Beatles when I was 11/12 and at school.
When I was 18 I got my first guitar. As they disbanded I spent the next two years learning a lot of their songs. My daughters were born in 1982 and 1984, and The Beatles were still played a lot in our house, and they knew a lot of songs off by heart by time they were 10. When the internet appeared, I showed them the Beatles on youtube. They both agreed that George was 'cute'. They also agreed that Yoko Ono was ugly. |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
tut tut tut...
|
|
By:
You only had to watch the Beatle's Tribute that was on the other night to notice that their music STILL appeals to ALL generations.
|
|
By:
and what do they think then artie o f ucking wise one?
|
|
By:
"their music STILL appeals to ALL generations." That doesn't mean it's any good.
|
|
By:
so they've been peddling carp for 50 years! clever lads.
|
|
By:
" clever lads. " Undoubtedly clever - skilled entrepreneurs.Just useless musically.
|
|
By:
Artie's on a fishing trip as usual.
The more you bite..... |
|
By:
"You only had to watch the Beatle's Tribute that was on the other night to notice that their music STILL appeals to ALL generations."
There's one tribute band The Bootleg Beatles and they've been going for 30 years, that is 3 times longer than the 'real' Beatles were together. |
|
By:
artie is seething that The Beatles put an end to the Skiffle groups
![]() He's probably got a Lonnie Donigan poster on his bedroom wall. ![]() |