Mar 18, 2014 -- 1:19PM, brendanuk1 wrote:
Yes its really patchy considering it was 10 days ago. These "2 corridors" are bit strange its one arc, but they remove the center part around the place it actually went missing
It's triangulation from a satellite orbitting earth. They could work out the approximate distance from the satellite only, hence the odd-looking arc.
Mar 18, 2014 -- 2:55PM, brendanuk1 wrote:
you what?
The satellite is 35,800 km above sea level. So you have to take that into account when calculating any distance. And because it's to the west of the last point of contact, then the western most parts of the red arc are presuambly too far away to the approximate distance given.
Certainly, that's the way I understood it. However, this has never been fully explained, and secondly, it depends what data you believe since nothing appears all that clear.
Mar 18, 2014 -- 12:09PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:
Cockpit fire/fire on board theory was looked at yesterday.The response was:"This theory has been disputed. If the course was changed during a major emergency, one might expect it to be done using manual control. But the left turn was the result of someone in the cockpit typing "seven or eight keystrokes into a computer on a knee-high pedestal between the captain and the first officer, according to officials", the New York Times reported. The paper says this "has reinforced the belief of investigators - first voiced by Malaysian officials - that the plane was deliberately diverted and that foul play was involved."
If the course was changed during a major emergency, one might expect it to be done using manual control. But the left turn was the result of someone in the cockpit typing "seven or eight keystrokes into a computer on a knee-high pedestal between the captain and the first officer, according to officials
How do they know this?
Mar 18, 2014 -- 3:56PM, Hamsterdam wrote:
There's a fantastic explanation of the radar arc herehttp://edition.cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2014/03/16/nr-myers-search-zeroing-southern-indian-ocean.cnn&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_topstories+%28RSS%3A+Top+Stories%29&video_referrer=
That is a brilliant explanation. Basically it's GPS but with just one satellite since the basics of GPS is we can see at least three satellites all the time.
Mar 18, 2014 -- 4:39PM, brendanuk1 wrote:
they can not tell if it went north or south even after analysis . They are guessing its south as northern route is populated / radar and would have expected some reaction from countries it flew over. 2 yellow lines are 2 possible speeds of the plane. A "few weeks" to search area. Guess the northern corridor one is covered by the Chinese
Except there is one theory that the pilot could have ghosted from another plane's radar being both hidden from the other plane - because it's transponders weren't on - and hidden from the ground - because the other plane was heading in that direction.
Mar 18, 2014 -- 5:00PM, Burton-Brewers wrote:
well it has certainly turned into a farce, the press must be loving this.
Farce. Exactly.
Was this simply a dry run by somebody to see if they could hijack a plane and evade detection? Because if so, the answer is a resounding yes.
Mar 18, 2014 -- 8:53PM, Helissio wrote:
Now I am confused. The west turn was programmed into Flight Management system before ACRAS sent this information back at 1.07amIf it was a hijacking/suicide the pilots turned off the ACRAS system after putting this turn in. Did they not know this information would be sent out?
Made the turn to try and find an airport because of a fire and then turned it off maybe?