Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Pokermonster
21 Jan 13 22:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Sep 04
| Topic/replies: 11,746 | Blogger: Pokermonster's blog
I watched Quentin Tarantino's latest movie this evening and was dismayed to notice a 19th century billiards table sporting a 21st century cueball.  I've never seen such a glaring error, it ruined the whole film for me. 

Just thought I'd give you all a heads up so you can save your money.
Pause Switch to Standard View Django Unchained.
Show More
Loading...
Report TELL DEL January 22, 2013 11:32 AM GMT
Going to see it this week, looks very good from the trailer, long film nearly 3 hours, longer than Les Mis !
Report David Fishwick Minibus Sales January 22, 2013 11:34 AM GMT
excellent advice PM, much appreciated.
Report stonecold- January 22, 2013 11:41 AM GMT
i really liked the film myself
Report TheBetterBettor January 22, 2013 12:09 PM GMT
aswell as everyone having shiney ass teeth....Also, most of them have gone under the surgeons knife.
Report SlippyBlue January 22, 2013 12:29 PM GMT
I'll see it in the next couple of weeks when I get around to it. From what I've seen it has had favourable reviews but a quick half time pint will be the order of the day no doubt.
Report Hound-Dog-2 January 22, 2013 2:53 PM GMT
"Good, cold, evening gentlemen.
Amongst your inventory, I've been led to believe,
there's a specimen I'm keen to acquire."

Django - the 'D' is silent.
Report bobtoe January 22, 2013 3:04 PM GMT
I thought I spotted a mistake when Leo Di Capiro's character was talking about Phylogeny when the film was set before Darwin published 'On the Origin of the Species'. However I've checked and the tree of life hypothesis was about before 1859.

Good film though a bit long. I preferred Inglorious Basterds.
Report Pokermonster January 23, 2013 12:47 AM GMT
It was riddled with mistakes in my view.  Django's sunglasses were far too modern; three corpses (worth thousands of dollars in bounty) were just abandoned; plus the aforementioned cueball.

Joking aside, though, I didn't like the film very much.  It was too long and I found the blood-spattering effects overly dramatic and unconvincing.  Some of those old six-shooters blew people away like a damned bazooka.
Report Pokermonster January 23, 2013 12:50 AM GMT
On a positive note, I thought the main actors performed well.
Report NSL January 23, 2013 5:49 PM GMT
Christoph Waltz is an outstanding actor.
Report rommel January 24, 2013 11:45 AM GMT
comic book cerrrrrrrrrrrrrrap
Report Hound-Dog-2 January 24, 2013 11:57 AM GMT
"Christoph Waltz is an outstanding actor."

In his mid-30's he was just a bit actor with small parts in TV and film and a bit of theatre work, and more or less accepted he was never going to make it now......then  Quentin Tarantino somehow discovered him......and when he was in Inglorious Basterds he was the only actor in any Tarantino film to win an oscar. And QT was quick to use him again in Django.
Report MadVlad January 24, 2013 5:26 PM GMT
brilliant film Cool
Report Facts January 24, 2013 5:32 PM GMT
^ yep. It is. Outstanding again from QT

rommel - comic book ? exactly - thats the point !! hth.
Report rommel January 25, 2013 9:23 AM GMT
dont mind comic book,do mind cerrrap,hth
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com