|
By:
Only problem with the BBC is it is too cheap.
Mind you I don't read the Daily Mail and haven't had my fragile mind warped by its war on political correctness. |
|
By:
BBC4 offers some very interesting programs
maybe BBC3 but I am bit old for that good childrens TV coverage...even older for that BBC1...seems more a womans channel now BBC2 emr I am not sure what that is personal imo |
|
By:
BBC3 and BBC4 don't start until 7:00 PM.
Why's that when all the commercial channels start in the morning? Are they on ration? |
|
By:
I will hunt you down Crippen you piece of s***
|
|
By:
BBC4 and BBC3 are a little specialised
very much aimed at a certain audience..so limited content which is good in my opinion commercial channels doing this..tend to repeat all day long ITV much better for Drama imo have been for a long time now |
|
By:
I don't particularly want to pay the BBC to film programmes like Eastenders and Strictly, but understand that they are there to provide a range of programmes for the whole country.
I do like the fact that they make commercially unprofitable documentaries on BBC4 which I do like, and wouldn't be made by any other broadcaster in the world It's far from perfect but far better than any alternative currently out there - I can't imagine that there is anyone in Britain who wouldn't enjoy any of its productions |
|
By:
I will hunt you down Crippen you piece of s***
Class post salmon, nice one. I'm immediately putting you down as my number one stalker on the strength of that. |
|
By:
I assumed he was joking, DC. If not, that's too much
![]() |
|
By:
get rid of it ,subscription or advertisement should fund it ,there is nothing left on it anyway
would actually be prepaired to pay a smaller fee for radio .. |
|
By:
orioles he'll get over it.
I've forgiven him for it already. |
|
By:
phil
The communication act is ledislation gone though parlment passed by goverment but it is not part of the constitution which is common law.It is classed as commercial law, two very different things.the law of the land aplies to this topic. Also the courts would never grant a search warrant on the grounds mr xxx may or may not have have a tv pulling live broadcasts. Sorry Phil but you are piling confusion up on confusion. Common law refers to the centuries of judge made law and the system of precedent. It is one part of our legal system which is accompanied by parliamentary law. To suggest that parliamentary law is somehow not law is nonsense. Parliament is the most important law making body in the country which is embodied in the notion that parliament can make any law and break any law. In short the law of the land is Parliamentary Acts and common law with parliamentary acts being the most important. You are also wrong about the courts. They would indeed grant a warrant. Whether the BBC would apply for one is unlikely. |
|
By:
I'm sure it would do very well on subscription, certainly its programmes sell very well abroad, but the point surely is to provide some intelligent television for those who would otherwise watch x factor all day. I genuinely doubt they would subscribe, however good value it is.
|
|
By:
I see absolutely no intelligent television at all on BBC1..
but yes the rest of their channels tv/radio have some merit imo |
|
By:
Eeternaloptimist
The face remains it is an act,which in turn needs agreement to be enforsed,without your name or address or signature they have not got a contract and can not prosucute,this i why the inspectors are only payed their £20 fee if they get one of the above. You can also remove the implied right of access if you do not what anymore doorstep visits off them. And if it somehow went to court the bill of rights 1689 would kick it and it would be throw out it says, That all grants of promises of fines and foreitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void. late for work now |
|
By:
phil - that is complete nonsense.
|
|
By:
BBC3 and BBC4 don't start until 7:00 PM.
Why's that when all the commercial channels start in the morning? Are they on ration? Sort of, they share bandwidth with the two children's channels (so can't broadcast at the same times). The constraints on available broadcast time does seem to improve programme output as measured against the 'opposition'. |
|
By:
"they share bandwidth with the two children's channels"
don't the bbc have a restraining order? like Elmo? |
|
By:
phil
sibaroni said it all really. |