No doubt some will still be saying its all a big conspiracy despite the overwhelming evidence the SIR JIMMY was a sick pedo who groomed young girl as young as 12 to commit sexual acts on them.
having said that - the alleged abuse at the remand/school for girls sounds a bit too true for me !!!?? but the crunch for me is who has actually witnessed any of this ie have they an abused girl and someone who has seen it or do we say he was far too crafty as is they type if you hear from coppers who specialise in this - this is what they say about abusers - very careful and even clever.
having said that - the alleged abuse at the remand/school for girls sounds a bit too true for me !!!?? but the crunch for me is who has actually witnessed any of this ie have they an abused girl and someone who has seen itor do we say he was far too
The interview he give about glitter, when he said glitter can do what he likes in prviate on pc and in southeast asia was very telling too
The evidence given by the women pretty strongThe interview he give about glitter, when he said glitter can do what he likes in prviate on pc and in southeast asia was very telling too
Not too sure about the credibility of any of those supposed victims However on the face of it his comments about glitter do seem to reveal a mindset with a paedo tendency At the end of the day he is with us and cannot defend himself so cannot see th epoint of all this coming out now
Not too sure about the credibility of any of those supposed victimsHowever on the face of it his comments about glitter do seem to reveal a mindset with a paedo tendencyAt the end of the day he is with us and cannot defend himself so cannot see th e
Not a great time to be a teenage pop picker with Glitter and Saville around.From the same era add J.King and Len Fairclough.Very dangerous times indeed.
Not a great time to be a teenage pop picker with Glitter and Saville around.From the same era add J.King and Len Fairclough.Very dangerous times indeed.
Probably hundreds of showbiz/music industry types involved with 14/15 year old girls. Perhaps younger.
Probably been going on for centuries with powerful/successful people in society.
Probably hundreds of showbiz/music industry types involved with 14/15 year old girls. Perhaps younger.Probably been going on for centuries with powerful/successful people in society.
its interesting to note that when he died ,there were very few fellow entertainers at his funeral .and the tributes from his colleagues were few and far between .both the tributes from dj diddy david hamilton and dave lee travis were very very guarded
its interesting to note that when he died ,there were very few fellow entertainers at his funeral .and the tributes from his colleagues were few and far between .both the tributes from dj diddy david hamilton and dave lee travis were very very guarde
xmoneyx 04 Oct 12 02:31 Joined: 12 Jul 11 | Topic/replies: 5,620 | Blogger: xmoneyx's blog My specialist subject on mastermind is jimmy saville
- I just hope one of the questions you get asked isn't how to spell his surname then ;)
xmoneyx04 Oct 12 02:31Joined:12 Jul 11| Topic/replies: 5,620 | Blogger: xmoneyx's blogMy specialist subject on mastermind is jimmy saville- I just hope one of the questions you get asked isn't how to spell his surname then ;)
Emden Date Joined: 07 Jan 08 Add contact 04 Oct 12 13:37 The 'finger up the anus' accusation was the tipping point for me.
Shirley she wouldn't make that up - unless she was a bit twisted herself?
While the nation was revolted at this point Garry Gliiter was crawling from under his stone to have a good jerk.
EmdenDate Joined: 07 Jan 08Add contact04 Oct 12 13:37The 'finger up the anus' accusation was the tipping point for me.Shirley she wouldn't make that up - unless she was a bit twisted herself?While the nation was revolted at this point Garry Gliit
Brian Hitchen: 'I've known Jimmy Savile was a child abuser for the last 45 years'
Andrew Pugh 04 October 2012
Former Sunday Express and Daily Star editor Brian Hitchen today claimed he has known Jimmy Savile abused under-age girls for the past 45 years.
Writing in the Daily Express, Hitchen said the only thing that “puzzled” him about the revelations of the last week was “that it took so long for his sexual victims to come out of the woodwork”.
Hitchen said he first heard the allegations from the captain of the liner Canberra, who recalled how he had thrown Savile off his ship in Gibraltar after complaints from the parents of a 14-year-old girl who he was harassing.
He wrote:
So why in all the years that have passed since I was first told did I never write about Savile? Two reasons. In those days newspapers did not write "nasty" stories about celebrities unless the famous had been handsomely paid for their often fairly tame revelations.
The second reason is because Britain's libel laws too often help make those like Savile untouchable.
The public knew him as a selfless man who raised millions of pounds for Stoke Mandeville Hospital in Buckinghamshire. Perhaps they should have wondered why he waited so long for a knighthood.
The answer was simple - the Establishment always suspected that he had skeletons in his cupboard.
He added:
Jimmy Savile was not a nice man. I feel desperately sorry for his victims and for his adoring public who even now will not want to believe the bad stories about their hero.
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/content/brian-hitchen-ive-known-jimmy-savile-was-child-abuser-last-45-yearsBrian Hitchen: 'I've known Jimmy Savile was a child abuser for the last 45 years'Andrew Pugh 04 October 2012 Former Sunday Express and Daily Sta
Also why didn`t Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.
She should have refused to give any opinion if she only had some doubt he was innocent.
Also why didn`t Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.She should have refused to give any opinion if she only had some doubt he was innocent.
Also why did Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute after his death when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.
She should have refused to give any opinion if she only had some doubt he was innocent.
Also why did Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute after his death when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.She should have refused to give any opinion if she only had some doubt he was innocent.
she was working under the constraints of the bbc this could be classed as bringing the bbc into disrepute in which case she could be sacked by them or worse still she could start telling some home truths in which case the tactics at the highest level of the bbc are discredit and character assasination ie.DAVIC IKE AND MANY OTHERS
she was working under the constraints of the bbc this could be classed as bringing the bbc into disrepute in which case she could be sacked by them or worse still she could start telling some home truths in which case the tactics at the highest level
daz55o Date Joined: 22 Feb 12 Add contact | Send message 03 Oct 12 23:54 Joined: 22 Feb 12 | Topic/replies: 1,133 | Blogger: daz55o's blog ur finger in his anus
Len Fairclough
daz55oDate Joined: 22 Feb 12Add contact | Send message03 Oct 12 23:54Joined:22 Feb 12| Topic/replies: 1,133 | Blogger: daz55o's blogur finger in his anusLen Fairclough
Angel Gabrial 04 Oct 12 14:58 Joined: 09 May 05 | Topic/replies: 7,407 | Blogger: Angel Gabrial's blog Also why did Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute after his death when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.
She should have refused to give any opinion if she only had some doubt he was innocent.
You knew but you didn't do anything about it because you were too concerned about your career of laughing at **** shaped vegetables. Oh, well - that's life. you evil, toothy ****.
Angel Gabrial 04 Oct 12 14:58 Joined: 09 May 05 | Topic/replies: 7,407 | Blogger: Angel Gabrial's blogAlso why did Eshter Ranstzen give him such a glowing tribute after his death when she knew deep down the rumours were probably true.She should have
Especially as she is the face/voice of Child line.
She basically admitted that she knew/they all knew about JS. So why did she continue to praise him after his death.
Especially as she is the face/voice of Child line.She basically admitted that she knew/they all knew about JS. So why did she continue to praise him after his death.
I think she was just protecting her own interests she would have been highly paid woman at that time and if she spoke out she would have lost her job. The bbc have quite strict contractual agreements
I think she was just protecting her own interests she would have been highly paid woman at that time and if she spoke out she would have lost her job. The bbc have quite strict contractual agreements
Nicky Campbell was very discreet on the phone in this morning
He cam into contact with him regularly when he was on radio one and all he will say is that saville seemed to be a very private man
Nicky Campbell was very discreet on the phone in this morningHe cam into contact with him regularly when he was on radio one and all he will say is that saville seemed to be a very private man
Think this is why esther is doing rounds on every media outlet to condemn it now because she trying to put herself in better light because it doesnt look very good at all on her to almost admit knowing about JS and doing nothing about it given her childline work.
Think this is why esther is doing rounds on every media outlet to condemn it now because she trying to put herself in better light because it doesnt look very good at all on her to almost admit knowing about JS and doing nothing about it given her ch
Almost as guilty as sir pedo are former BBC employees who kept a lid on what he was doing, for fear of losing their jobs because of his celebrity and power within the organisation.
Almost as guilty as sir pedo are former BBC employees who kept a lid on what he was doing, for fear of losing their jobs because of his celebrity and power within the organisation.
The BBC would earn a (very) small iota of my respect if the organisation held its hand up and apologised for what has become a very obvious cover-up. Sadly, there's just too much fear of reprisal borne from arrogance. An apology would at least serve to prevent something similar in future.
The BBC would earn a (very) small iota of my respect if the organisation held its hand up and apologised for what has become a very obvious cover-up. Sadly, there's just too much fear of reprisal borne from arrogance. An apology would at least serve
just been lookinIt's almost disappeared from the BBC mobile website already. It's been reduced to a mere one line headline ('BBC denies Saville cover-up claims') with no picture. It's well below all the news, sport and upcoming shows though. Hidden because it's not a big deal.
just been lookinIt's almost disappeared from the BBC mobile website already. It's been reduced to a mere one line headline ('BBC denies Saville cover-up claims') with no picture. It's well below all the news, sport and upcoming shows though. Hidden b