Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
This has worked well elsewhere, so let's share it here.
Post your answer and reasoning...
Post your answer and reasoning...
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 30
|
By:
0
|
|
By:
BINGO!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
42
|
|
By:
5.......................dont tell anyone else
 |
|
By:
What do I need to type into my calculator so it says BOOBIES if I turn it upside down iyo?
|
|
By:
totally meaningless without brackets imo
|
|
By:
meaningless?
It's a sum. Sums don't require brackets to be valid. |
|
By:
15
BODMAS rules Acronym, Definition. BODMAS, Brackets Order Division Multiply Add Subtract (mnemonic for order in which mathematical calculations are done |
|
By:
Is this in base 10?
|
|
By:
Please refer to my previous answer on the football forum
|
|
By:
its 15 and i will bet anyone a million zillion pounds sterling.
|
|
By:
1. If you do it on a standard calculator it is zero. (Scientific mode doesn't count)
2. A calculator is a machine. 3. A machine can do counting stuff faster and more accurately than all people. 4. Therefore it is zero. |
|
By:
Zero
Can't really give any reasoning other than it's a sum and the answer is 0. Is that the right answer? |
|
By:
ok maybe the answer is 15
|
|
By:
^
You cheated |
|
By:
robert earnshaw
|
|
By:
How about this one:
Int[x/Sin(x)] from 0 to sqrt(13). Any ideas? |
|
By:
42
again |
|
By:
any number X 0 = 0
|
|
By:
BODMASS
=> 15 |
|
By:
BODMAS ffs
|
|
By:
15
no brackets |
|
By:
agreed on the BODMAS (the brackets would be merely indicative)
5 + 5 + 5 - 5 + 5 + 5 - 5 + 5 x 0 = ? 0 x 5... 0 5 + 5 + 5 - 5 + 5 + 5 - 5 ... 15 |
|
By:
The chit chat forum has performed better than the football forum imo
 |
|
By:
I was taught PEMDAS instead of BODMAS, answer still 15 though.
|
|
By:
15 is it.
|
|
By:
I have to say, this has totally freaked me out, I use my windows calculator (in scientific view) to calculate loadings and pressures for my engineering design work!
In scientific view it comes out 15, in normal view it comes out 0. I am now concerned about how many projects over the years have been over or under engineered  due to this bollo x. Seriously, wish i hadnt read this thread  |
|
By:
I remember this issue arising in the mid-70s when pocket calculators first entered general use. Obviously they weren't allowed in classrooms, and one maths teacher used to use this kind of example, whereby the answer is given as 0 instead of the correct 15, as a reason why they never would be.
 |