We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Mate, it came as news to you that Murray plays passive and couldn't win that way.
He is not a genius. I'm objective but its obvious you are blinkered by your adoration for Murray. Wasting my time. |
|
By:
wd sonko
|
|
By:
murray and fed are all about working it out and great shot making
Absolute utter sh1te. You've already admitted he plays passive and thus waits for errors so that is not shot making. |
|
By:
it came as news to me?
i said murray was playing too passive.. he doesnt often play that passively, its cost him before in big matches, and it did again today im not blinkered in anyway, maybe u are in your dislike for murray |
|
By:
brodie
becker/ henman called it correct...andy did have the armoury to attack more but didnt... the legend at the other end put him off doing so |
|
By:
i didnt, please dont manipulate what i said
|
|
By:
fed was far too good for murray whatever
|
|
By:
You said he played passive. Why bother saying that if you weren't trying to be observant? Trouble is he did that against Roddick too and is a common charge made against him. Hardly an attribute of genius is it?
|
|
By:
yeah he did play passive..
did you see him playing that passively during the rest of the tournament?? |
|
By:
I'm arguing with you and this common thing nowadays to heap superlatives on people when they are not deserved. When you grow up a bit and stop behaving like a giddy girl ,you might be objective and realise you are talking sh1te.
|
|
By:
He played passive when it counted ,that's not a genius and he's not a shot maker. Your arguments are flawed.
|
|
By:
he's not a shot maker? lol
|
|
By:
why bother insulting me? can u not hold a debate without getting personal? does it add a touch of superiority towards your side of the argument?
|
|
By:
It's not the main attribute of his game when the heat is on is it?
All players can look like superstars and blaze shots around when there's no pressure on. I've got it straight now anyway. A very good player in your head = genius. About wraps it up |
|
By:
murray not that passive tbh
just doesn't have the weapons to really hurt roger |
|
By:
Because you are beginning to come across as a fool and I don't like wasting my time. Child
|
|
By:
cb iyo is Murray a genius?
|
|
By:
some of his shotmaking is genius yeah
|
|
By:
im not coming across as a fool at all, you are the one who doesnt seem to know what they are talking about
my views are my views.. and some argumentative person will not change them no matter how you manipulate my statements and for the record i said he was a tennis genius, before you bring anything else other than tennis into it |
|
By:
very diplomatic.
|
|
By:
one of the best returners ever and that's simply a fact
|
|
By:
what else am i going to bring into it andy. in what respect of genius did you think i was talking about. is it not obvious i'm referring to murray's tennis game?
see ,talking like a fool. |
|
By:
andy would have two grand slam's in his hip..if the greatest player that ever breathed wasn't around in his era.....
|
|
By:
the way you have manipulated everything else i have said, i just wanted to make it clear.. nothing wrong with that
do you watch tennis much btw? |
|
By:
Mabrook Ibrahima
|
|
By:
12.05 post by AM is pathetic.
Murray is a very good player. Federer is a genius. The simple point I am making. Murray has improved markedy thru fitness training like Nadal, but they are not genius like a Fed. Really is that simple. Nad w/o his endurance is average. Manufactured like Murray is in comparison to Fed.. |
|
By:
I haven't manipulated what you've said andy ,i've replied to it and disagreed.
|
|
By:
i agree nadal isnt a tennis genius
but disagree with you about murray |
|
By:
okay sorry for the insults ,but its obvious we'll never agree. Bye
|
|
By:
and vwd Sonko again, sorry to rant :D
|
|
By:
Actually I wanna apologise to Andy. I remember when I was young and would get right behind sportsmen I liked and it would affect me when they lost. Nothing wrong with being passionate about summat and believing in someone. Take care, sorry again.
|
|
By:
wd IS.
|
|
By:
please, dont patronise me
|
|
By:
It was a genuine apology andy.
|
|
By:
A pleasing outcome all round,eh? I just hope 23yo Nadal and his six Slam titles aren't too crushed at not being considered as much a genius as Murray.
|
|
By:
great point mik
rafa a great player too |
|
By:
was
|
|
By:
maybe canary, but some people still been very dismissive of his talent.
|
|
By:
yeah the weight of muscle done for roid-boy imo. joints couldn't take it no more.
sorry ,but I hate c****s and I think he really could be one. |
|
By:
it's rather difficult to be given he's owned fed on every surface in slam finals
sadly injury will cut short his greatness |