We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Flatliner -8 witnesses.Are we talking about a small hamlet here?
|
|
By:
wouldn,t think many people would be hanging round the outside of the pentagon, just read wiki i don,t get involved with people,s OCDs.
|
|
By:
Because Wikipedia is gospel :^0
|
|
By:
lots of people saw 'a plane' flying towards the pentagon
but it wasn't in the direction /flight path in the official report & none of them saw it actually hit |
|
By:
Hey, I've been doing this for years. I don't pick my points, I just take the first.
'There was never any debris from a plane found at the site' Substantiate this claim or admit you're lying. |
|
By:
with respect birchola it seems very odd that the US authorities would claim that a hijacked plane crashed into the pentagon when it fact there was a bomb blast. it would seem an impossibly difficult secret to keep!
|
|
By:
No, Occams Razor, just how many people have got to be in on your fantasy for it to work?
There you go :) |
|
By:
if indeed it was a bomb surely they would just claim that the terrorists planted it rather than go for the plane line
|
|
By:
Reason rarely applies here! I love the idea, oft posted here, that terrorists blew up the WTC and just kinda hijacked and flew planes into into it for the hell of it!
|
|
By:
Birchola?
|
|
By:
sh1t!!! maybe they've got Birchola!!!
|
|
By:
Rescue mission?
|
|
By:
Wet ops...
|
|
By:
we've gotta get Birchola back people!!!!
|
|
By:
It,s THEM I tell you!!!!!
|
|
By:
This thread will be deleted in 5 seconds. There never was a poster called Birchola. I know where you live.
|
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
The term 'no debris' was wide of the mark. Very minimal amounts were found. There was by no means enough that would constitute the remains of Flight 77.
|
|
By:
See, first point. Why read on?
|
|
By:
Thatcher was quite happy to sink the Belgrano to get re-elected.Nothing is beyond the realms of possibility.
|
|
By:
it is rather preposterous to claim that the US government would blow up the pentagon and then claim it was a plane strike. seems a very strange way of doing things...
|
|
By:
Preposterous but possible. Personally I believe our governments will go far further than we dare to believe to get what they're out to acheive. We are mere numbers to them :|
|
|
By:
Shall I have a look at your second claim?
|
|
By:
My second claim is even more controversial. Scores of Americans protest at the site of the twin towers on a daily basis demanding answers for the controversy surrounding building 7
|
|
By:
Doesn't sound very controversial to me, I'm fairly sure such people exist. Not sure if there are scores, but if someone like you is prepared to lie about the first point I questioned, all sorts of things could be possible. People can be both dishonest and gullible.
|
|
By:
I offer this as evidence. Bearing in mind the authorities claimed in no way was the building purposely demolished...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4&feature=related Watch from 4:10 minutes. |
|
By:
What is it?
|
|
By:
It is a youtube clip explaining why building 7 was a controlled demolition for no other reason other than to hide information stored inside.
|
|
By:
Funny how an undamaged steel structure collapses with column implosions only seen under the circumstances of a controlled demolition. No coincidence it's the first of its kind ever.
|
|
By:
n May 2002, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a report on the collapse based on a preliminary investigation conducted jointly with the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers under leadership of Dr. W. Gene Corley, P.E. FEMA made preliminary findings that the collapse was not primarily caused by actual impact damage from the collapse of 1 WTC and 2 WTC but by fires on multiple stories ignited by debris from the other two towers that continued unabated due to lack of water for sprinklers or manual firefighting. According to FEMA, structural elements were exposed to high temperatures for a sufficient period of time to reduce their strength to the point of collapse[
No mention of the obvious controlled demolition in the official government report. Hmmmmm. |
|
By:
so someone else's claim then, sorry but given that the first was a lie, I'm certainly not going to waste my time on this. If you'd posted something yourself, with credible sources I'd have a look, but honestly, I've been doing this for yours and it's always just nonsense. You shouldn't just believe stuff you see on the internet!
|
|
By:
'Someone elses claim'
I'm sorry but I wasnt there first hand to witness it myself. The video shows first hand video evidence. If you're willing to poo poo my argument then at least show the decency to watch and read the evidence before you. Or you could just put both hands over your eyes and believe what they want you to believe. |
|
By:
What's wrong Sparkmaster? Afraid you may see something that affects your blinkered mindset?
|
|
By:
WHAT ODDS ON THE POO POOING?
|
|
By:
To go back to the original post, what did Mock The Week Dara OBrein say ' When it has got to the point where i am been photographed in my underwear in airports, i rather think the terroist has won '
|
|
By:
do you not remember a load getting killed at that army base?
|
|
By:
Illuminati
I agree with Birchola. |
|
By:
Still unable to answer Sparkmaster?
|