Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
ghh
15 Dec 09 23:28
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 1,806 | Blogger: ghh's blog
You may have heard that Unite, the union that represents our cabin crew, has threatened strike action between 22 December 2009 and 2 January 2010.

Let me say immediately we will do everything we can to assist you at what will clearly be a very difficult time if strikes go ahead. We are working hard on contingency plans, and will announce them as soon as they are finalised.

We are also urging Unite to return to the negotiating table. There are important issues on which we have asked them to put forward new ideas.

Strike action is completely unjustified.

It's no secret that British Airways is in financial difficulty. Like other global airlines, we have been hit extremely hard by the slump in business travel brought on by the world recession.

We lost £400m last year and will lose at least as much this year. These are the worst financial results in our history. Our revenue is down £1 billion, so reducing costs is absolutely essential even to begin heading back toward profitability and long-term survival.

Many of my colleagues understand this. Our pilots have agreed a pay cut. Our engineers have agreed more efficient ways of working. A third of our managers have accepted voluntary redundancy. And nearly 7,000 colleagues volunteered for salary reductions because they wanted to help this great British company in a time of need.

But our cabin crew union has refused to engage in this process seriously.

My admiration for the professionalism and skills of British Airways cabin crew is second to none. They are an absolutely vital part of our airline, and a great asset. But they have been disgracefully misled by Unite as to how our company-wide cost reduction programme would affect them.

Unite claims that we are trying to "intimidate workers into accepting poorer contracts", forcing crew to leave the company, and "attacking" their pay and allowances.

This is fiction. Our package involves no reduction in terms or conditions for existing crew. Our Heathrow crew will remain the best paid in the industry. Average earnings for cabin services directors are £56,000 on long-haul and £52,000 on short-haul. For junior crew, they are £35,000 and £26,000 respectively. According to the Civil Aviation Authority, average costs of BA crew are twice those of their Virgin Atlantic counterparts.

In fact, despite our financial backdrop, more than 10,000 of our cabin crew will receive pay rises of between two and seven per cent this year, and again next year. In the worst recession since the Second World War, these are increases many employees in other walks of life can only dream about.

We have created opportunities for voluntary redundancy, and more than 1,000 crew have taken that option. Similarly, more than 3,000 crew have volunteered to switch to part-time working.

To accommodate these requests, we have made a small change in our onboard crew numbers from Heathrow, without affecting service standards. Our Gatwick flights have been operating on equivalent crew numbers for years - with Unite's agreement.

Unite's chief complaint seems to be that we are "imposing" the changes at Heathrow. The truth is we had been discussing them with the union for nine months but, despite all the evidence of the company's (and the industry's) financial plight, Unite would not be realistic about the clear imperative to reduce costs.

We could not wait any longer. We moved ahead, making sure that our changes were squarely based on voluntary choices for individuals.

Unite claims the changes affect contractual terms and conditions. We believe they do not. The union failed to gain an injunction to prevent their introduction, but a full court hearing to settle the contractual question has been set for February 2010.

We do not understand why Unite is threatening you with disrupted travel plans now over an issue that the courts are preparing to resolve in a few weeks.

A strike can achieve nothing except huge upset and inconvenience for you. We will do our best to provide as much help and support as we can.


Willie Walsh
Pause • Switch to Standard View A message from Willie Walsh
Show More
Loading...
Report owl4life • December 15, 2009 11:31 PM GMT
booooooo
Report sidthekid • December 16, 2009 7:49 AM GMT
There are 7 Million Unemployed, with training, many of these BA staff could be replaced with people accepting a lower wage (£20,000) than BA staff get now (£30,000+).
This company is lose`ing £1 Million per day, it cannot go on.
8 AM this morning i mananaged to change my flight from Dec 22nd to the 20th, so B0ll0cks to their Strike!!!!!!!!
Report eddietasker • December 16, 2009 8:14 AM GMT
wille walsh couldnt run a bath lets see how much the board of directors have given up in this tough time and do the ex directors still get their free 1st class flights
Report oi churchill • December 16, 2009 9:04 AM GMT
How many unite members will be disrupted,those who have booked holidays.S hitty union.
Report CJ • December 16, 2009 11:56 AM GMT
Need another Maggie to break this union.
Report HarryCrumb • December 16, 2009 11:59 AM GMT
BA will be gone soon along with any hope of the pension fund being funded. Then they wont be happy.
Report rogerthebutler • December 16, 2009 12:01 PM GMT
I get the impression both sides would rather the entire company goes to the wall, than either of them give an inch.
Report twopoundpunter • December 16, 2009 12:08 PM GMT
what all these unions forget ...well they probably dont forget is that their employers have t keep their businesses going ...their purpose is not to provide cosy jobs for their members .
Report Hoss • December 16, 2009 12:20 PM GMT
I agree with Roger, the management thought they could bully the staff into accepting drastic cuts using the financial deficit as leverage, the union has threatened strike action knowing that the company can't afford one.

Now neither side seems willing to negotiate, both claiming the moral high ground and not wanting to be the ''1st to blink''.
Report RockMonkey • December 16, 2009 12:31 PM GMT
what all these unions forget ...[b]well they probably dont forget is that their employers have t keep their businesses going ...their purpose is not to provide cosy jobs for their members .

It's the workers that keep businesses going, not the employers
Report HarryCrumb • December 16, 2009 12:31 PM GMT
When the staff are signing on for their 60 quid a week jobseekers and going for agency work at minuimum wage they will wish they had used their brains a bit more and not let Unions lead them to a battle they couldnt win.
Report overboard • December 16, 2009 5:18 PM GMT
This screams out for a pre-pack administration to dump the debt and the majority of the staff and start again with a clean sheet and free of the pension fund nightmare. And no Unions allowed.
Any other business would have done this ages ago. Presumably it would be a politcal disaster as this is the National carrier.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com