Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
JUGADOR MEJOR
07 Dec 09 23:03
Joined:
Date Joined: 30 Jul 09
| Topic/replies: 1,604 | Blogger: JUGADOR MEJOR's blog
Correct answers only.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 41
By:
Poppydog.
When: 07 Dec 09 23:12
SotL?
By:
johnwark
When: 07 Dec 09 23:12
halloween 4?
By:
Big Charlie
When: 07 Dec 09 23:15
SAW 74
By:
Shenanigans
When: 07 Dec 09 23:17
Sequel 2
By:
Brodie
When: 07 Dec 09 23:17
hills have eyes 3
By:
Big Charlie
When: 07 Dec 09 23:18
18 brides for 18 brothers
By:
Big Charlie
When: 07 Dec 09 23:18
Groundhog Day 4
By:
Big Charlie
When: 07 Dec 09 23:19
Harry Potter and the only ginger kid in the country with a mate.
By:
Putitinabox&sellit
When: 07 Dec 09 23:19
the one starring george sequel
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 07 Dec 09 23:34
It was in fact:-
halloween III- Season of the Witch

No sign of Michael Myers anywhere.
By:
Pokermonster
When: 08 Dec 09 12:29
Hannibal Rising might fit the bill, too.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 14:29
That was a prequel
By:
Benny brown trousers
When: 08 Dec 09 14:36
First blood ?
By:
cliff
When: 08 Dec 09 18:14
I knew that... Do I win a prize?
By:
Poppydog.
When: 08 Dec 09 18:21
Silence of the Lambs (Manhunter)

as per my 00:12 post
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 18:49
Silence of the Lambs is a Thriller, not a Horror.
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 18:50
Wrong
By:
Charles1980
When: 08 Dec 09 18:52
Saw 5
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 18:55
Journeyman 08 Dec 19:50
Wrong


What is?
By:
baracouda30
When: 08 Dec 09 19:56
It was in fact:-
halloween III- Season of the Witch

No sign of Michael Myers anywhere.


Surely the sequel that wasn't a sequel was Halloween 3? (if you call a third film in a series a sequel)

So the sequel to that (again, if sequel is the right word) is Halloween 4.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 19:58
Have you been drinking?
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 19:59
No. Because Halloween 4 was a sequel to Halloween 2, not Halloween 3.

BUT Halloween 3 had a fantastic 80s electro theme tune. Very spooky and lo-fi
By:
cliff
When: 08 Dec 09 19:59
The question is badly worded - it could be interpreted either way IMO.
By:
baracouda30
When: 08 Dec 09 20:00
OK, if H4 was a sequel to H2 then you're saying that H2 wasn't a sequel.

Except it was.
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 20:08
So the actual answer is Halloween 5 :D

think about it. It's true.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 20:10
Journeyman
Don't try to hi-jack my thread again, go start your own where the tumble weed tumbles and take your mind bending puzzles & drugs with you.
By:
baracouda30
When: 08 Dec 09 20:11
There is no answer.

The sequel that wasn't a sequel can only possibly be H3 (if you assume that the word sequel is the correct word).

There was no sequel to H3 because the story went back to Michael Myers as per H1 & H2.

So the answer is....there is no answer.
By:
delz
When: 08 Dec 09 20:12
ffs, get over it!
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 20:14
:^0
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 20:15
baracouda30 08 Dec 21:11
There is no answer.

The sequel that wasn't a sequel can only possibly be H3 (if you assume that the word sequel is the correct word).


I agree the answer is Haloween III as previously posted.
By:
cliff
When: 08 Dec 09 20:17
**, im stopping thinking about this now. This is a right head pickle...
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 20:19
You don't need to think, you have been given the answer :|
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 20:20
Lol. You might have previously posted it but you're wrong

Which horror film was a sequel to a sequel that wasn't a sequel?

'A sequel that wasn't a sequel' has to be simultaneously a sequel and not a sequel
(in different senses) to meet that definition. Agreed? Good.

Halloween 4 was a sequel (to Halloween 2) but not a sequel to the film immediately before it in the chain.

So

the film that was 'a sequel to a sequel that wasn't a sequel'
has to be Halloween 5.
By:
cliff
When: 08 Dec 09 20:20
But it's not the right answer
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 20:21
Why not?

Halloween 3 certainly is the wrong answer.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 20:22
Journeyman.

Making a fool of himself yet again.
By:
cliff
When: 08 Dec 09 20:23
The word sequel cannot be used 3 times in that sentence if it is to make sense.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 08 Dec 09 20:28
Haloween 2 was the sequel to haloween (that is agreed), therefore when released haloween 3 was supposed to be a sequel to the sequel (h2), however when people went to the cinema it did not deliver what they thought it was going to. Summing up, it was billed as a sequel to a sequel in name but the storyline was not a sequel.
By:
Journeyman
When: 08 Dec 09 20:29
Yes we know that.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com