Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
silverwasp
02 Dec 09 23:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 16 Jan 05
| Topic/replies: 1,997 | Blogger: silverwasp's blog
I think it should. I know a girl that went to hospital for a Hysterectomy, they cut an Artery by mistake during Surgery. She lost a lot of blood .The Hospital had no supply blood and it had to rushed from an other Hospital to save her life.
Pause • Switch to Standard View Should it be made Law for healthy...
Show More
Loading...
Report The Priest • December 2, 2009 11:02 PM GMT
have to agree i think
Report yorky • December 2, 2009 11:02 PM GMT
I will go asap, very good thread
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:03 PM GMT
Not really something you can enforce by law. Ridiculous
Report HallGreenSpy • December 2, 2009 11:04 PM GMT
Donors are great, but impossible.
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:05 PM GMT
Nothing should be made compulsory, but I urge anyone who is fit and well enough to do so to donate blood.
It's one of the easiest things you can do in life to benefit someone else.

Here's the web-site. Just put in your postcode and you can see where your nearest blood donor session is:

http://www.blood.co.uk/SessionSearcher/Search.aspx
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:05 PM GMT
its against the law to leave the scene of a car accident... and not try and help.... whats the difference ?
Report casemoney • December 2, 2009 11:06 PM GMT
people should do it ,saying that I never have ,being a complete wimp to wards anything medical I would probably need a weeks rest
after it .
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:07 PM GMT
could do it like a national lottery, everone watching noel edmonds pull your numbers out on a saturday nightl, **uld get alot of viewers. itv would probally be interested, maybe channel 5.
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:07 PM GMT
casemoney.. you would change your tune if a member of your family needed blood
Report HallGreenSpy • December 2, 2009 11:08 PM GMT
silver, that is a bit harsh imo.
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:08 PM GMT
Its an invasive procedure.The difference is evident. It's not viable.
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:09 PM GMT
so it was... sorry
Report HallGreenSpy • December 2, 2009 11:10 PM GMT
its against the law to leave the scene of a car accident... and not try and help.... whats the difference ?

And that has to be the worst comparison ive ever heard
tbh
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:10 PM GMT
what about paying people for their blood, would that work
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:10 PM GMT
That works but not here.Its unethical.
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:11 PM GMT
is really that unethical to pay for it here
Report casemoney • December 2, 2009 11:11 PM GMT
I would silver ,but im a tos ser, honest ,I would be ill or feeling ill for a week after ,saying that Im never well anyway ,my blood is fooked with nicotine and alchohol ,people should donate including myself .
Report Tess • December 2, 2009 11:11 PM GMT
So how would this law be enforced? Who would be excluded? Would you include plasma or just blood? At what age would enforcement begin and end? Would our GPs determine our 'health'? (overworked already?)

What would be next, I wonder? Bone Marrow? 1 kidney each?

Jehovahs Witnesses? Forcibly removed?
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:13 PM GMT
what about consessions on council tax etc for blood instead of cash
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:14 PM GMT
LAW is a crazy idea i know... im only trying highlight the importance of donating blood.
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:15 PM GMT
* to highlight *
Report casemoney • December 2, 2009 11:16 PM GMT
heed the baw 03 Dec 00:13


what about consessions on council tax etc for blood instead of cash

the place would be mobbed :-)
Report HallGreenSpy • December 2, 2009 11:16 PM GMT
And fair play to you silver. A very good cause.

A new thread every month might get a few, especially if you highlight a few examples.

1 new thread every month. If you get 1 a year, all the better. :-)
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:21 PM GMT
I think it's a very good tag line on the home page of the National Blood site:

"Do something amazing...
96% of us rely on the other 4% to give blood. Please don't leave it to someone else."

http://www.blood.co.uk/
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:23 PM GMT
Casemoney.. the first time i donated 10 years ago, i thought i would leave feeling as weak as a kitten but i felt no different.. its the easiest thing in the world to do.. i also smoke. Now i hate to miss a session to donate. Its only 3/4 time a year... i would go every week if they would take me..Its nice to think that maybe you have saved a child's life.... it has feel good factor
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:24 PM GMT
For anyone who might be nervous/unsure about the procedure, don't be.
It really is very simple and painless to donate - and very, very few people experience any ill-effects from it.
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:25 PM GMT
is there places to donate in every town
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:26 PM GMT
most towns i believe. Check out one of those sites Tommy toes posted.
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:26 PM GMT
Usually, Heed the Haw.
Just type in your postcode on the site above.
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:26 PM GMT
As the least likely candidate for giving anything back I am almost convinced. Talk me through the procedure Tommy.
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:32 PM GMT
http://www.scotblood.co.uk/ use this one if your from scotland, yep some place to go to near me.

if youve got any drugs in your system i take it you would have to wait a wee while before donating
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:32 PM GMT
Just give them a ring on the free 'phone number on the site, Dobbo.
They will ask you a few basic questions and tell you where and when your nearest place to donate is.

They will then issue you with a donor number and send you an information booklet in the post, so you can check you are eligible to donate (there are a few restrictions regarding health etc).
If you think you are fine to give blood, just go along to the session ( a pre-booked time will save any waiting).

There, they take a small blood sample from your finger to check you aren't anaemic. If all is well, they just put a needle in your arm and draw the blood off (a unit - just under a pint). It takes approx ten mins.
Then, you go and have a coffee/soft drink and biscuits, which they provide for free - and you toddle off home.
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:34 PM GMT
PS - you lie on a bed as you are donating.
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:34 PM GMT
Isn't that nearly an arm full?
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:35 PM GMT
lol
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:36 PM GMT
It is indeed, Dobbo!
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:37 PM GMT
how long would one need to wait
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:39 PM GMT
HTH, if you mean before you book: no time at all, it's just a matter of where and when your nearest session is and when you are available.
Report Dobbo • December 2, 2009 11:40 PM GMT
HTH is washing his hair that day
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:40 PM GMT
no i mean i take the odd smoke once in a while
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:40 PM GMT
For instance, the nearest place to me only holds a session once every 3-4 months, but there is a place a few miles away which has weekly sessions.
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:41 PM GMT
smoking is ok... i smoke... no waiting
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:41 PM GMT
dope ok
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:42 PM GMT
lol not sure.. ask tommey
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:42 PM GMT
HTH, I don't think there are any restrictions on people smoking cannabis/marijuana. Certainly not tobacco. It's just intraveinous drug takers who are excluded.
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:43 PM GMT
i inject weed into my system tho
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:43 PM GMT
only joking maybe not a suitable joke on a thread like this
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:44 PM GMT
Thanks for your input Tommy. great job
Report BillKiller • December 2, 2009 11:44 PM GMT
Nobody should ever be forced by the government to give blood but they should force themselves to do it. If you would accept blood for yourself or a loved one then you are morally bound to offer some of your own.

It's quick, it doesn't hurt and you get a biscuit. What more could you want?

Of course, chit chatters' blood is unfit for purpose and goes off to the black pudding factory but that does entitle you to a discount in Tesco.

Some of the above is untrue but not the bit about the biscuit.
Report heed the baw • December 2, 2009 11:44 PM GMT
but yeah i think il try do it soon, just never really went coz i sometimes take a smoke
Report redrich • December 2, 2009 11:44 PM GMT
Yes more people should give blood but to try and force people or guilt trip them is out of order.

There is a surpirising lack of awareness about giving blood. There may be the odd advert on TV but it would surely be better to approach companies, for example, tc and try and get some staff to sign up to donate regularly.
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:49 PM GMT
No problem, Silverwasp.
It's something I'm pretty passionate about too.
My mum spent the last 10 years, before she died a few months ago, having fortnightly blood transfusions of at least 4 units.
Sometimes, I had to rush her in via 999 for another 6 pints when she had a massive bleed (rare condition).

I just thank everyone who selflessly donated their blood.
Without those people, she wouldn't have survived.
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:51 PM GMT
Red, it's true - a lot of people just aren't aware of it.
I think far more people would donate if it was talked about more.
Report redrich • December 2, 2009 11:52 PM GMT
They should target a areas with offices and turn up with the mobile units and get a full days worth of donations from office workers etc
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:56 PM GMT
Red, I know they used to do that in the past with pottery factories and pits around here.
My dad always donated at the pit.
Sadly, there aren't any pits and very few factories here now.
Report silverwasp • December 2, 2009 11:56 PM GMT
Tommy.. i don't know you but im still sorry to hear of your bereavement
Report Tommy Toes • December 2, 2009 11:58 PM GMT
Thanks Silverwasp.
She was as tough and brave as they come, but even she had to go eventually.
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:03 AM GMT
When she was in hospital for the last time, it was the haematology/cancer ward.

One day, I overheard a young bloke talking to a nurse on duty at the desk.
He was telling her how grateful he was, as his friend had been rushed in at the weekend and they'd saved his life. He asked was there anything he could do in return.
"Just give blood" was the nurses reply "That's the best thing anyone can do."
Report silverwasp • December 3, 2009 12:07 AM GMT
I think its sad that people die just because people couldn't be bothered to give maybe 40 minutes out of their lives a few times in the year. People just seem scared when there is nothing to be scared of.
Report larrence • December 3, 2009 12:11 AM GMT
Anyone who donates blood is a top top person, in my twenties i had a blood transfusion and can't thank the people who donated enough. You are suppossed to have 8 pints of blood in your body, and i needed a 3 pint transfusion. Thankyou very much to thoughs good people , they saved my life :)
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:12 AM GMT
I don't think people are scared, in particular, Silverwasp, I just think they don't really think about it.

It's something like: "I'll do that one day" but seldom get around to.
There are many, many good people out there who would give blood if they just took a minute or so to book an appointment - then, theyd get reminders through the post for their next session and so would be prompted to be a 'regular', without having to think about it.
Report silverwasp • December 3, 2009 12:12 AM GMT
You were worth saving im sure.
Report Far From Trouble • December 3, 2009 12:19 AM GMT
I've considered this for some time without actualy getting round to it.

Sorry if I repeat any above comments, but do you just turn up on the day or do you need to ring/book in advance?
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:21 AM GMT
FFT, you don't need to book, you can just turn up - but if you do book, it saves on the waiting time if it's a busy session.
Report Far From Trouble • December 3, 2009 12:22 AM GMT
thank you TT

I take it it doesn't matter if you don't know your blood type, no idea what mine is!
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:26 AM GMT
It doesn't matter at all, FFT!
I'm O negative, which means my blood can be used for anyone in a dire emergency, until the proper group is available.
If you look on the blood site I put up earlier, you can see how low the blood stocks are for each type (Graph on home page).
It's worth remembering; blood has a very limited shelf life so regular donations are very, very important.
Report Far From Trouble • December 3, 2009 12:41 AM GMT
Thanks again TT

i'm currently on an alternating shift pattern at work (6am-2pm on week, 2pm-10pm the next)


I guess it isn't advisable to do it before work then when i'm on lates?
It's something I really want to do though
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:46 AM GMT
FFT, if you have a manual job, it's best to donate after work, but if not, before would be fine.
You really don't feel any side effects from it (unless you are extremely unlucky), but they advise no heavy lifting for about 6 hours after a donation.
Report Far From Trouble • December 3, 2009 12:47 AM GMT
ok thanks once more!

I must retreat to my resting place now, james toney ;)
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 12:48 AM GMT
No problem, FFT.
"James Toney"!
Report Veck • December 3, 2009 12:49 AM GMT
Should the same rules apply to organ donation?
Report Tommy Toes • December 3, 2009 2:20 AM GMT
Which rules?
This thread is primarily about blood donation. Silverwasp admitted he didn't really mean to say it should be compulsory. He was just trying to highlight donating.
Report Lies, DamnLies, and Statistics • December 3, 2009 4:15 AM GMT
i have donated blood three times and fainted all three...

no way, imo
Report V4 Vendetta • December 3, 2009 7:59 AM GMT
No.
Report billy hill • December 3, 2009 8:48 AM GMT
UK doesn't pay for people to give blood as it might encourage people to do it just for the money when they are not fit or healthy enough. I remember once a homeless guy came in to one of the walk-in sessions to give blood just for the tea and biscuits. As he hadn't eaten for 2 days they wouldn't let him.

Also you mustn't give blood if you have done one of the "at risk" activities, but don't want to let your friends / family / work colleagues know that you have done the "at risk" activity. (Although I think the blood people can still take the donation and then dispose of it)
Report Ukmalllia • December 3, 2009 8:57 AM GMT
It's all about convenience to do it. I have just done a search and my closest one anytime soon is 5 miles away and it's 2 days before Christmas ffs !

The next one is 3 miles and in 4 months.

If they want blood they need to use a van and visit a view streets for a 1 hour in each area and they would get people donating.

Too much hassle and inconvenice the way they have it set up at the moment.
Report Then Again • December 3, 2009 9:16 AM GMT
Thought about this for a while and finally got around to booking an appointment next week.Thanks for the helpful comments on here.
Report travelling_man.. • December 3, 2009 9:48 AM GMT
Wouldn't mind but they want almost a whole armful ;)
Report Make my hay • December 3, 2009 9:54 AM GMT
I think topless nurses would encourage more people to go and donate blood
Report wur • December 3, 2009 10:31 AM GMT
I've given blood once. I fainted afterwards.
Report billy hill • December 3, 2009 10:38 AM GMT
i've been about 40 times now. never fainted or felt faint. nothing really to worry about, just take it easy the rest of the day and don't do anything strenuous or plan being out late as you might be a little more tired than usual.
Report owl4life • December 3, 2009 10:40 AM GMT
great thing to do, every1 who is fit and healthy should do it and any1 who says "i'm scared of needles" needs to be lined up and shot
Report Manchester Untied Dave • December 3, 2009 10:49 AM GMT
I have given blood. But my blood does not belong to the Government. There is no way in hell they should make it compulsary.
Report Ukmalllia • December 3, 2009 11:02 AM GMT
They need to make it convenient, simple as that, take a lead out of say Dominos pizza's book. They are fast, relibale, sure it's expensive and not the greatest ever, but at least you know you get it in 30 mins straight to your door. They need to come to your home to take your blood.
Report owl4life • December 3, 2009 11:12 AM GMT
im all for the compulsory blood giving, course theres always gonna b sum ponces moaning about their rights, boo hoo
Report Mc Moonbeam • December 3, 2009 11:13 AM GMT
What a stupid fckin idea .
Report Tallywagger. • December 3, 2009 11:15 AM GMT
I needed a fair amount of blood a few years back, so a big thank you to those of you who bother to donate. A few of my family members now donate.

That is the way it should be. The hospitals should ask anyone needing blood if they could ask family/friends to donate some.

If they get 20 people donate out of every 100 asked, then it is worth the effort!
Report owl4life • December 3, 2009 11:15 AM GMT
whats stupid bout it?
Report Mc Moonbeam • December 3, 2009 11:18 AM GMT
It'd be like the final straw of human rights been taken away imo

OWNED BY THE GOVERNMENT

WHATEVER NEXT ... AFTER THAT ?

Just because 1 person needs blood nobody should be forced to give it .. though many still would

Why don't they just charge the earth for it like everything else they do ?
Report Ukmalllia • December 3, 2009 11:25 AM GMT
Maybe we could have a fee/fine system, if your healthy you HAVE to give 4 pints a year (1 for each 3 month quaterly period) , for each pint not given you have to pay a £25 fine as such, be a nice little earner if someone misses all 4 appointments and has to pay £100 into the treasury for it..Im on the phone to Gordon now !
Report owl4life • December 3, 2009 11:31 AM GMT
beltin idea
Report silverwasp • December 3, 2009 4:45 PM GMT
We can benefit ourselves from donating blood..

American Medical Association (www.ama-assn.org), that found that giving blood every six months led to fewer heart attacks and strokes in test participants ages 43 to 61.
According to www.bloodcenters.org, excessive iron is thought to contribute to heart disease, especially at its early stages. Donating blood on a regular basis reduces the iron stores in the body and this study supports the theory that reducing iron appears to preserve heart and vascular health.What a win/win situation, huh? Give blood to someone who needs it and do your own body good at the same time. What's more, regular blood donations may help keep the body's circulatory system healthy by reducing stores of iron, but the effect may not work for older people
Report TheRankingMissP • December 3, 2009 7:14 PM GMT
TT, sorry to hear of your loss.

I've got a leaflet right here that has been sitting by the sofa for about 10 days...will go to blood.co.uk and book an appointment.

Apart from anything else, it's supposed to be quite good for your health to give blood.
Report TheRankingMissP • December 3, 2009 7:20 PM GMT
redrich 03 Dec 00:44

There is a surpirising lack of awareness about giving blood. There may be the odd advert on TV but it would surely be better to approach companies, for example, tc and try and get some staff to sign up to donate regularly.

They do - there was a bunch in our foyer a couple of weeks ago, that's how I got sent a leaflet.
Report chris79 • December 3, 2009 7:30 PM GMT
It certainly shouldn't be a legal requirement to give blood. It would seem too weird to me to be forced to give up part of your body to the government. That said i have donated blood on about a dozen occasions although i am always annoyed at how long it takes - never less than 90 minutes to do the whole thing. Surely if i can give up my blood and my time the NHS can at least pay for enough nurses for it to be a quicker process rather than all the waiting.

I do think something should be done about the organ donor system, where it is crazy that people die with healthy organs whilst others die because they need healthy organs. Most people want organs if they need a transplant yet so many don't want/bother to go on the register. I would have a simple system of at 18 people choose to go on the reigster or not. If they are on, ie. willing to give their organs on death, then they will be on the list of those who are not. Then people cannot complain as more volunteers on the register would equal more available organs; those not willing to give theirs shouldn't and wouldn't receive anyone else's - unless all those willing to be on the register have been satisfied.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com