Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 118 comments are related to the topic:
fat fvcks and jealousy

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 118
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:20
are you going to answer my direct question or not?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:20
ask me the question directly
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:21
i'm not accusing you. i'm asking you in a most direct way.

you seem to be avoiding answering though.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:21
what are you asking? , ask me
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:21
ok. i'll ASK once again
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:21
go on
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:24
punterfleecer, betfair forumite,

did you, or did you not, openly admit (on this and/or other fora) that you would have, and also advocated, sexual intercourse with 14-year-old females, based on the (alleged) fact that it was permitted to do so in other european countries, insomuchas, and notwithstanding, it was the (alleged) law of aforementioned supposed countries?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:26
that's not a direct question..........so many brackets in your question, that can apply to 100 countries!

ask me a direct question..............direct
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:26
...bearing in mind there are witnesses to your previous involvement in said subject.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:27
if you arent, you are making accusations, which is unlawful
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:28
are you trying to scare me? you aren't
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:28
are you going to make unlawful accusations, or have you got something to say?
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:29
i used "(alleged)" because that it is what you claimed at the time. i don't know the facking laws. you said it was okay in holland or germany or somewhere.

you seem to be dilly-dallying in your answer.

a simple yes (you did say that), or a no (you didnt say that) will suffice.


yes? or, no?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:29
to what question NAP?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:30
this isn't Holland or Germany, this is the UK, and you are making a fool of yourself
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:30
once again, i have not accused you of anything. i am merely asking a direct question which, for some reason, you seem unwilling to answer.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:30
but what is the question??? you haven't asked?
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:31
your continued reluctance to answer....

what can that possibly insinuate?

are you willing to answer the direct question? yes or no...did you say that?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:32
that question you asked me, diverted anywhere, ask me a direct question.........a simple question, are you a politician in disguise?
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:33
[b]did you openly admit that you would, or advocated, sexual intercourse with 14-year-old females, based on the foreign laws?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:33
based on foreign laws? why is that relevant?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:35
asking me questions on foreign laws? whats it matter? if you kill someone in USA, apparently you get the death sentence!, shocking!
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:37
i am using the term 'based on foreign laws' because i believe you may have used that particular phrase in previous defence of alleged assertions.
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:39
to put simply (to aid your brain):

[b]did you previously openly admit that you would, or advocated, sexual intercourse with 14-year-old females? canaryboy, fresh and others may recall this particular subject.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:40
so?, what are you saying? remember, what you say here, is applicable to the court
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:40
once again NOTE, i am asking you.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:41
(NAP) 07 Nov 03:39
to put simply (to aid your brain):

did you previously openly admit that you would, or advocated, sexual intercourse with 14-year-old females? canaryboy, fresh and others may recall this particular subject.


In Britain? No,

remember, what you say here could have serious consequences
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:41
can you answer?
are you able to answer?
are you reluctant to answer?
did you or didnt you?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:42
I just did
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:42
In Britain? No,

what does this mean? can you expand?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:42
I don't see what I have to expand on?
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:43
do you mean you were in Britain when you answered?
do you mean you were just referring to the laws which apply in Britain?

i need help here. please help.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:44
laws that apply in Britain,

you are seriously in trouble

so shut up
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:46
i am not in any kind of trouble. i have asked questions which seem reluctant to answer.

[b]what say, for example, would have been your answer if you were Dutch or German (bearing in mind you are Scottish)?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:47
yea it's called harrassment
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:47
yes you are in trouble
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:48
stop bloody typing then. i only asked a question and you persisted in not answering. you harrassed me for an explanation as to what i was asking.
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:49
just be quiet
By:
(NAP)
When: 07 Nov 09 02:50
do you have a (british) headache?
By:
punterfleecer
When: 07 Nov 09 02:53
NAP, if i really could do something about your internet harassment, I could

just behave yourself
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com