|
By:
Nothing can be taken from the first race, as was still seemingly going well when coming down, so who knows what might have happened. Last year, who knows what happened in that race, it was most unsatisfactory, and I even suspect some kind of foul play the way Bobs Worth and SC jinked after the final fence. He looks a better horse this year, without any interruptions in his prep, and I think he'll take all the beating.
|
|
By:
Is third time lucky a good stat in this race?
|
|
By:
First time runners have a very good record in the race in recent years.
I really don't see the track being an issue like some people do, something was clearly amiss last year & the cheek pieces have definitely helped. The only slight negative this season is that you can argue he's been outstaying two & a half milers. Lets hope this is his year as I've backed him at 20/1 to win The KG & GC ![]() |
|
By:
Good luck to you, man.
|
|
By:
i think he would have won the year he fell, and think hes a 10lb better animal now
last year was farce no ones ever expained it, yes SC was shattered after the last but the other 4 were to, my theory was they went half a stride quicker on that fast ground then they had ever been and nothing else to give. best horse in the race for me by miles, prob get 5/1 morning of the race will do or me, second in is a handicapper, and holywell do me a favour. will double my best espcially if a bit juice in the ground, |
|
By:
So - how many have won at the third time of asking? Anyone? Stats guys?
|
|
By:
You've only asked twice.
|
|
By:
OCI Club • February 22, 2015 3:21 PM GMT
Nothing can be taken from the first race, as was still seemingly going well when coming down, so who knows what might have happened. Last year, who knows what happened in that race, it was most unsatisfactory, and I even suspect some kind of foul play the way Bobs Worth and SC jinked after the final fence. He looks a better horse this year, without any interruptions in his prep, and I think he'll take all the beating....not sure nothing can be taken from the first race. horses may reason for falling is due to tiredness. |
|
By:
On stats ...SC is one of the lays of fez but I for one hope he wins as for the last two years he has been the best horse in the country.
|
|
By:
Punjabi, Binocular, Cue Card, Fondmort, Kicking King, War of Attrition all won championship races at The Festival having lost twice on their two previous runs at the meeting...so it's that uncommon
|
|
By:
I don't think his exposure matters given the form he is in. You know what level he is going to run to and it is down to the rest to bridge the gap. 3/1 seems reasonable to me.
|
|
By:
Cue Card didn't lose his first two visits. He won the Bumper.
|
|
By:
And we were asking specifically about the Gold Cup
|
|
By:
disgraceful slant against cuey that |
|
By:
2 years ago was going very well until falling, would've been involved in finish nevertheless, was fancied to win it.
1 year ago he had ulcer which Nicholls discovered only after Aintree which was the reason for wandering around in the final stages(both GC and Bowl Chase) as the pain was increasing, even more evident on the stiff uphill at Chelt. This year he is an improved horse following the ulcers treatment and should take the Gold Cup leaving the absolute farce last year 1-2-3 finishers well behind. Stats don't apply to him as he wasn't giving his best on the first 2 attempts(faller and internal injury) |
|
By:
Whilst that's true soyouthink I don't think any of those examples you gave had gone for the same race three times and surely that is the relevant issue?
|
|
By:
Falling doesn't count? Really?
|
|
By:
no fallers don't count because we can't quantify form in those situations, especially when SC was in contention and was travelling much better than the rest when making the mistake(the only major one out of his 200+ jumped fences in career) therefore you can't include SC with the likes of Giant Bolster's who have tried several times and weren't good enough.
|
|
By:
He wasn't travelling much better than the rest though timtin. Sir Des Champs was travelling just as well as SC going in to the fence but as we saw on the run in his petrol ran out and he was outstayed. Would the same have happened to SC? Who knows. We do know he was outstayed last year on better ground though and we do know that whilst TGB may not be quite good enough at least he has actually won at the course which despite three efforts SC is yet to do. Maybe it's horses for courses costing him? I couldn't back him at the price but I certainly wouldn't say he can't win if they hold him together and make a little less use of him than last year.
|
|
By:
And just maybe despite the visual evidence it may have been the fall of a horse who's mind was beginning to wander because he was getting a bit tired?
|
|
By:
Have been looking at RPR ratings as an index of their relative ability. Took the last 5 runs where they recorded an RPR.
Avg Max Min Silviniaco Conti77 178 178 164 171 169 172 178 164 Road To Riches75 172 170 159 165 158 165 172 158 Ma Filleule27 159 158 98 164 157 147 164 98 Holywell29 170 152 167 162 143 159 170 143 Lord Windermere33 160 160 161 170 143 159 170 143 On His Own33 157 170 91 73 170 132 170 73 The Giant Bolster48 162 164 131 170 165 158 170 131 Carlingford Lough33 169 163 158 154 152 159 169 152 Coneygree34 169 159 149 146 146 154 169 146 Don Cossack57 169 166 162 155 138 158 169 138 Many Clouds48 169 165 158 150 152 159 169 150 Houblon Des Obeaux34 163 168 167 152 149 160 168 149 Sam Winner75 168 166 161 153 156 161 168 153 Bobs Worth75 159 167 165 140 181 162 181 140 Champagne Fever27 165 167 167 164 147 162 167 147 Boston Bob33 159 165 161 141 165 158 165 141 First Lieutenant33 146 161 120 162 165 151 165 120 Djakadam50 160 132 146 119 135 138 160 119 Smad Place48 160 149 163 157 139 154 163 139 Ballycasey27 144 139 149 154 156 148 156 139 Theatre Guide27 141 149 155 158 156 152 158 141 Home Farm33 147 153 136 149 146.25 146 153 136 Spring Heeled20 140 151 144 151 127 143 151 127 River Choice114 129 122 134 140 131.25 131 140 122 Silviniaco Conti's average RPR over his last 5 runs is higher than the maximum rating achieved by al other horses in the field with the exception of Bob's Worth and Road to Riches. His minimum rating is higher than the average rating of all other horses in the field, with the exception of Road to Riches. In short, he's consistently been operating at a higher level than his opposition for some time. Now, if he can only translate that into form on the day when it counts............. I also have those two horses top from an overall trends perspective. Silviniaco Conti77 82% Road To Riches75 78% Holywell29 73% Carlingford Lough33 72% Many Clouds48 67% Champagne Fever27 60% Don Cossack57 60% Sam Winner75 56% Coneygree34 53% Lord Windermere33 51% Boston Bob33 50% Bobs Worth75 50% Djakadam50 49% Ballycasey27 45% Houblon Des Obeaux34 44% Smad Place48 44% Home Farm33 38% Spring Heeled226 37% On His Own33 37% Theatre Guide27 32% First Lieutenant33 31% Ma Filleule27 31% The Giant Bolster48 30% River Choice114 17% |
|
By:
On the list of RPR ratings, the Avg, Max and Min should be over the last 3 columns of the data.
|
|
By:
Being a huge Bobs worth fan and having maximum respect for Silvi I have watched last years gold cup back umpteen times and I still can make no sense of what happened on the far side. It was like they were running in treacle and I simply cannot have it that Silvi and especially Bob don't stay. Silvi almost started walking sideways for a few seconds and Bob jinked dramatically to the left for no reason whatsoever. Incredible scenes.
|
|
By:
Winning the same race the third time of asking must be rare.
|
|
By:
I'm with Silviniaco Conti .... just wondering would the RPR analysis above - which is quite interesting - be shewed by the fact that a lot of SC's opposition is just out of novice company and they may not have been running at this level long enough to produce a high RPR?
Nevertheless it does strengthen the case for him and makes good reading from my point of view! |
|
By:
Isn't the RPR meant to be a measure of performance irrespective of the opposition i.e. an absolute rather than a relative measure?
|
|
By:
Most forgotten race horse in recent times..........SIR BOBS WORTH.
|
|
By:
That's the thing, JC, we pretty much know what level SC is at and what he'll run to. It's down to the others to better it.
|
|
By:
^^^ Not sure we do at Cheltenham, though. If this race at Kempton we might know what he is capable of but here not so sure. (fall, and ulcers apparently)
|
|
By:
Different horse this year - assume headgear and ulcers. Think it will hose up by 2-3 lengths. Struck by your comment JOCI on foul play last year. I thought exactly the same but never saw anything suggested. Imagination could run here...some kind of long distance 'stun'gun from Cleeve Hill?
![]() |
|
By:
^^^ there was loads of posts on here at the time, almost like they were spooked in exactly same place jacob horse went mental an hour before!!
|
|
By:
Amazing how those ulcers kick in at the end of the race.
He has smashed up a load of non stayers this season.I don't think LW will retain his crown but I would have him in a match bet with SC all day. |
|
By:
This argument has gone round the houses on the Gold Cup thread.
|
|
By:
back SC for 2016 Ryanair!!
|
|
By:
back SC for 2016 Ryanair!!
|
|
By:
back SC for 2016 Ryanair!!
|
|
By:
back SC for 2016 Ryanair!!
|
|
By:
back SC for 2016 Ryanair!!
|
|
By:
I get the 'horses for courses' argument but it's hardly like he's been well beat in his 3 runs there. It just reminds me of the Sire De Grugy last year when plenty were saying it couldn't win at Cheltenham.
I think Conti is the best horse in the race by far and a very worthy favourite, it seems to be a better horse than last year since the cheekpieces have been added as well. I think if it gets around safely and they hold it up a bit longer it wins. If I wasn't on at bigger prices already it would be my only bet in the race at the current price - still seems overpriced to me! I am not a 'stats' guy for backing or laying but I think there are valid excuses for being beat last year (freakish plus ulcers) and we will never know if it would have won the year before when seemingly going as well as anything in the race. Maybe I am blinkered when it comes to this horse, and 2 years ago was the best chance of him winning a Gold Cup, but I honestly think it is a better animal now than back then and will take all the beating in a couple of weeks time. |