Forums

Cheltenham Festival

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Roger De Bris
16 Mar 13 01:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 Dec 08
| Topic/replies: 14,933 | Blogger: Roger De Bris's blog
how do you explain the huge difference?
What going allowance do you come up with for these 2 races?
The average of the 2, gives CF a very big number, and HF a poor one, or 2 different going allowances?
Pause Switch to Standard View Supreme Novice time v Champion Hurdle...
Show More
Loading...
Report Howdi March 16, 2013 12:12 AM GMT
what were the times
Report Roger De Bris March 16, 2013 12:16 AM GMT
CF 3.55.60
HF 3.59.35

3.5 secs quicker. I've never known in recent years such a difference.
Report Roger De Bris March 16, 2013 12:17 AM GMT
3.75 secs to be precise!
Report judorick March 16, 2013 12:24 AM GMT
the only explanation I had was that the ground was unraced on when CF won the Supreme but had been opened up by the time of the Champion
Report judorick March 16, 2013 12:25 AM GMT
the only explanation I had was that the ground was unraced on when CF won the Supreme but had been opened up by the time of the Champion
Report Roger De Bris March 16, 2013 12:43 AM GMT
that's what I'm thinking, 2 seperate going allowances for each race.
Simon Rowlands of Timeform said the mid-race pace of the CH caused the final time to be so slow.
I have the Supreme slow 25 lengths/mile and the Champion Hurdle slow 34 lengths/mile..too big a difference.
Report CVByrne March 16, 2013 12:35 PM GMT
Or you could post the sectional times and you'd get your answer.

The Champion was run at a very fast early and middle section pace. So they were getting tired in the last section.
Report p_r_e_m_i_e_r__f_a_n_t_a_s_y March 16, 2013 12:38 PM GMT
It's down to the fact how hard they went in the middle part of the Champion Hurdle, Noel went very hard in the middle part where as Ruby set a more even gallop on Champagne Fever in the Supreme
Report SoYouThink March 16, 2013 12:46 PM GMT
Could be that the form of the form of the Supreme is very strong. That's the most likely explanation.

Don't think Hurricane Fly quickened like he has in the past. Plus he had a few worrying strides in the middle of the race and now Mullins is talking about running him in France over 3m 1f. The ground has tipped it in Hurricane Fly's favour this year, run the Champion Hurdle today and I think Rock On Ruby might edge it. All opinions but that's mine.

In a year, a lot of the build-up could centre on Hurricane Fly's ageing years and whether or not he possesses his old speed.

In 2 years, he might even be running in the Stayers. That's where Hardy Eustace ended up.

Fair play to him, great horse and he deserved a second Champion Hurdle. Might have been his third/fourth but for injuries.
Report duncan idaho March 16, 2013 3:06 PM GMT
going opened up by 12 horses = 3+secs diff Crazy  ...smell the coffee lads
Report Roger De Bris March 16, 2013 3:41 PM GMT
what SF you give CF & HF duncan?
Report duffy March 17, 2013 12:07 AM GMT
It wasn't a slow race, well, apart from the end bit, between the 2nd and 3rd hurdles up hill, fehily put the hammer down and went a full 3 secs quicker than the supreme, that killed them late on and walsh that kept an even pace through-out towed them to a faster time.
Report duffy March 17, 2013 12:11 AM GMT
That's why zark was knackered at the end because jacob was so determined to keep his horse in touch (without realizing that fehily was absolutely killing them with his early fractions) that he used absolutely everything up....yeh, zark wanted a strong pace to stay on from, but what fehily did particularly between 2 and 3 killed them, christ, even the fly couldn't go early doors, but walsh had the sense not to batter his horse to try and do it.
Report duncan idaho March 17, 2013 1:21 PM GMT
Roger, i dont do SFs but i do study sectionals, which tell the story of this race....a dozen or so hoofprints aint going to make any discernible difference to race times


totally agree with that reading, duffy...thought the rides on H Fly and Bobs Worth very similar, Geraghty in particular rode a cracker imo....Zarkandar and poss also Sir Des Champs paid for more aggressive rides (closer to strong/solid pace), the old Francome saying about getting a stayer beat by asking it to do too much too soon
Report The_LUFCwaffe March 17, 2013 1:37 PM GMT
Turftrax have supplied sectional times this year, so its worthwhile looking at those to get the answer.

Watching the Champion Hurdle I also got the feeling that jockeys on RoR, Countrywide Flame and Zarkandar were under instruction to try and burn the finish out of HF. It didn't work in the end, but it was noticeable mid race that HF was being made to work hard. Had Grandouet stood up I'd say he'd have won as he was travelling very well during the stage of the race when the pressure was being applied to HF.
Report thieveslikeus March 17, 2013 1:38 PM GMT
HF's winning time in 2011 was also significantly slower than that year's Supreme.  Coincidence?
Report Brooksielad March 17, 2013 1:45 PM GMT
think one of this years novices will win next years champion. Preference to tent.
Report Roger De Bris March 17, 2013 3:46 PM GMT
all the other races point to it being around the 33L/mile slow on my numbers, so I'll go with that, and give CF a very big number.
CF 125
HF 116

Not my bread and butter, just like to dip in for the 4 days every year. Interesting sport nonetheless.

I can remember Back In Front getting a 126 or something at a non-Cheltenham festival meeting a few years back.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com