medermit and quevega

if they try then the are not very smart

that's interesting as one or two suggest that medermit is not as good as either big bucks or ghazio and someone said ghazio is a better choice than big bucks ... what dou think ??

game of opinions and most peoples opinion is that Medermit won the arkle on his last run at sandown,extremely impressive performance,had much more in hand than the winning margin and jumped and traveled like a real champion beating a very classy field in a hot time,Ghizao is a decent horse and is the only real challenger to Medermit,but a suspect that he will not have the speed to live with Medermit and will actually set the race up for him by giving Medermit a strong gallop and toeing him into the race,as for big bucks,well he will win easily and doing a double with either Medermit/Quevega or Medermit/Big Bucks would be just fine,would slightly prefer the latter as BB is a better price at the moment

i appreciate that fine summary and will give it my best shot

big bucks is the cert of the meeting

Medermit is 0 from 5 attempts at Cheltenham This is mainly dues to him taking too long to get into top gear. If both Finian's Rainbow and Ghizao make jumping errors to slow them down obviously it will increase Medermit's chances of getting into a challenging position.

Finian's Rainbow definitely jumps better when going at speed and Ghizao jumps like a gazelle but they are novices and Medermit is the more experienced animal.

No reason to believe Quevega won't win again if she hasn't gone backwards but you are betting blind on her.

Wouldn't dream of trying to talk you out of it as both could conceivably win but if you are having a 100 quid double have yourself 100 quid on Big Buck's and at least you'll get your cash back if your double goes AWOL.

Back Medermit in single win bet......(money back if 2nd)...then look at Q in the paddock...If she looks good to go - (she looked magnificent last year)...reinvest your Arkle returns.