Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 133 comments are related to the topic:
Menorah

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 133
By:
aka
When: 11 Dec 10 23:25
Steeple wrote: "he dispensed with them like third-raters today, steadied, then accelerated again, unlike the stoked up and sustained turn-of-foot typically shown by GN and HF".

I think that pinpoints well what was so impressive about Menorah today. We have seen him win battling his way to the line conceding weight in the Greatwood; we have seen him win the SN with a more sustained burst of speed not unlike that shown by GN when he won the SN. But I think we saw a different and even more impressive aspect of Menorah today - he accelerated very quickly over a short distance to make up ground and go past the others, and then after steadying and losing some momentum taking the final hurdle, he accelerated again up the hill. I wasn't expecting to see that from Menorah, and it is not something you see that often even among high class horses. The horse has an awful lot in his armoury on the evidence of his three somewhat contrasting winning runs at Cheltenham. He has shown the lot, basically, other than the key point that he has yet to compete in a race where the pace profile matches that typical of a CH. In March, he will likely find the early pace much more demanding than he has encountered previously.
By:
Alvarado
When: 12 Dec 10 00:10
a faster pace we,ll see a 10lb better menorah

roll on champion hurdle
By:
buddeliea
When: 12 Dec 10 08:50
i banged on about this horse last season for the supreme against all the Dunguib supporters,kept sticking up for him,and had a brilliant start to the festival.
Have i backed him for the CH? nope!! i am seriously kicking myself,had a look during the summer and just did not press the button on here.Kept thinking i should back him,and never did.
Now look!! oh well,i have PCross at nice price,but god do i wish i had Menorah as well,big big chance.Has it all for a CHurdler imo
Cant have current price though,but if he lines up on the day,he will be on my side.
By:
cryoftruth
When: 12 Dec 10 08:54
Yes I don't see the pace of a champion hurdle making the slightest difference to Menorah now.

What we were concerned about before his race yesterday was whether he would be anywhere near as effective in a smaller field where there was no pace as he seemed to just love a battle and need a test in the Greatwood Hurdle. Now he has simply sprinted away from them off a slow pace ir seems almost perverse to wuestionn wherther he would be as good in a faster run race.

More sensible is the question "what did he beat". The Nicholls horse looked very useful beating Zaynar, but he (Zaynar) seemed to be barking pretty loudly that day. Cue Card is a novice, albeit a pretty high class novice.

However the main form to go on may not be yesterday but his win in the Greatwood Hurdle, when he conceded all that weight to a huge field and battled off Bothy conceding about half a ton. The Racing Post rated Menorah 165 for that run and that was achieved on ground that he disliked and in a race that he was stuck out wide all the way so he is likely to be better than that. the Champion Hurdler, Binocular has run ratings in the 170'as only twice in his substantial career, and seems not entirely trustworthy, looking at his overall record. Peddlar's Cross' best ever effort was rated 163, and you just see him as a high class sitting duck foir Menorah at Cheltenham. Hurricane Fly's best ever effort is 164, not as good as Menorah and he seems unlikely to have the same scope for improvement.

I thought Menorah's Greatwood Hurdle win was top class at the time and of Champion Hurdle winning quality. The class he showed when really quickening without being asked a serious question just confirmed how much he has improved and how much serious class he seems to now have.
By:
aka
When: 12 Dec 10 14:47
I think the concern about Menorah as far as a small field race was  concerned was whether he would settle well off a slower pace with limited cover. Failing to settle well was the issue the trainer/jockey often referred to during Menorah's novice season. He settled well in the SN and has continued to show greater mental maturity this season.

I don't think there was any strong suggestion Menorah needed a fast pace to be at his best, other than the issue of settling the horse.

He generally travels so well and clearly can battle well, that you would imagine the faster early pace of the CH would hold no problems for him. But I would never take that for granted, how ever impressed I am by a horse (and I am very impressed by much of what Menorah has shown).

I wrote in the summer that I though Menorah was the only horse with the right mix of ability, if he continued to settle better in his races, to lay down an effective challenge to a top form Binocular on better ground. Binocular has achieved more on the clock than Menorah and proved in the renewal of the CH last season that he can withstand the strong early pace of a high quality championship race and still deliver a strong finishing kick. Menorah still has to prove he can do the same and the significance of that shouldn't be underestimated, imo.

Nevertheless, at the prices available before the start of the season. there was far more value to be had in backing Menorah's potential than in backing Binocular's proven class. Menorah is starting to show even more than I had expected and I have been very keen on him since his first run in novice company.
By:
Steeplechasing
When: 12 Dec 10 18:36
Despite the very classy impression he made yesterday, he did beat young pretenders whose merit in the top grade remains questionable, especially given the 4lbs SC was trying to concede the winner.

The relative proximity of Clerk's Choice, as I've mentioned elsewhere, raises further questions.  If yesterday's race is to be considered close to Champion Hurdle class (and 7/2 Menorah suggests a strong general belief that it does), then Clerk's Choice cannot possibly be an 80/1 chance.  Of the first four, he is the only one who not only handles an end-to-end gallop on the track, but relishes it. Given decent ground and a very hot pace, he'd easily be the value, for me, from yesterday's quartet.

What seems to be forgotten is that while Menorah beat some youngsters of unknown potential, Peddlers Cross beat the reigning Champion Hurdler with considerable aplomb at Newbury.  Granted, Binocular might not have been at his best, but, of the two races, which has produced the strongest form?
By:
CVByrne
When: 12 Dec 10 18:50
I agree with you Steeple. I think 7/2 quotes are an over reaction given there is zero form between those runners in the bula and the main contenders they will face in March.

I'd agree Peddlers form would be the better of the two, but fto against a Binocular that looked to blow up after the last isn't enough for 6/1 quotes either.

Over reaction to both performances imv. I'm wondering if we'll get a good trial in England before March. Peddlers Binocular rematch at Haydock in January possibly ?
By:
Alvarado
When: 12 Dec 10 19:10
honestly people banging on about this 4lb he recieved from SC honestly he could of given him 14lb and still thrashed him hes been so good this season and he deserves his place as market leader for the CH
By:
CVByrne
When: 12 Dec 10 19:15
Do you not think it's fair to say quotes of 7/2 are a bit skinny given he has no form with Binocular, Peddlers Cross, Khyber Kim, Hurricane Fly, Go Native or Solwhit all the rivals he'll face in March.

In fact is there any horse other than Silvicanio Conti and possibly Dunguib who he has beaten who he will face in March?
By:
aka
When: 12 Dec 10 19:51
I would say it is a skinny price on whatever measure. It is certainly very short in terms of conventional form analysis. The price is a little more understandable in terms of what a good visual impression Menorah has made in his three winning runs at Cheltenham, and the degree of versatility he has show in winning those races. But even so, the price is too short at this stage in relation to the high standard Binocular and KK set in the renewal last season and in terms of there being some other contenders this year who have yet to show their hand.

I certainly wouldn't advocate ignoring conventional form analysis. But equally how many CH trials in recent years have proved a really good guide to what is likely to happen on the day in the CH? As far as I recall there wasn't a lot in Hardy Eustace's form before Cheltenham that would have marked him out as the most likely winner of the race. Katchit and Sublimity certainly weren't the form picks, and Punjabi definitely wasn't. Brave Inca could look less than impressive in some of his trials. And what about Binocular's form going into the CH last season?

You may need to keep one eye in the form book, but goodness you need the other one looking in the opposite direction entirely if you are going to spot the winner of this race if recent winners are any guide.
By:
aka
When: 12 Dec 10 19:55
With Hardy Eustace, I meant his form in the trials each season leading up to the Festival.
By:
CVByrne
When: 12 Dec 10 20:08
Well Katchit had an exceptional record at Cheltenham. He also had to give weight to Osana and was off a short breat from the Fighting Fifth when beaten in the bula.

Punjabi was one of those you had to accept he would have been going for the million bonus if not falling at Kempton and Henderson said he needed the Kingwell to get fit.

Binocular was impossible to pick. I even layed out of my bet on him after his win over Dee Ee Williams.

Sublimity I didn't give a chance at all. Inca was easy enough he was on fire and Hardy's 2nd he was fav and Champ. His first caught me by surprise too.
By:
eric_morris
When: 12 Dec 10 20:11
aka ... the Irish trials are often run on slow ground not at all representative of Festival ground and are used to get the main contenders there fit, already we have W Mullins suggesting same again he just wants to get Hurricane Fly there on the day ready. What is a v good indicator is obviously Cheltenham form even though it may be a year old, Brave Inca 2nd in the Supreme for example. Sublimity was hidden under a bushell that wont be happening this season the leading contenders are not on the decline as that year, quite the opposite they are on the up. If you have an impressive Cheltenham trial winner virtually over the trip you have something valuable however bearing in mind Binocular wont be readied until the time I believe Menorah and Binocular should be jt favourites as they are similar style and think Henderson will have him spot on.
By:
aka
When: 12 Dec 10 20:21
Yes, it was Hardy Eustace's form in the seasonal trials more than his Cheltenham Festival form I was thinking of, as with Katchit.

Punjabi was an odd one. There was enough in his earlier form that season, I would have thought, to have supported his price in the CH market much better than proved to be the case after falling at Kempton and running poorly in the Kingwell. Still hard to believe he was being matched at 40s and higher on here just before the race.
By:
eric_morris
When: 12 Dec 10 20:29
Think Punjabi's CHurdle (posted up shortly after the race on here) was poor with Binocular way below his best. Katchit also, a couple of poor years there. This seasons is a high class race of that there is little doubt and course and virtual distance wins show who will be up there imo especially from an impressive Supreme winner.
By:
CVByrne
When: 12 Dec 10 21:05
Hard to believe aka but as I said back then the 44's offerend on here on Monday night were insulting. Anyway one mans loss is anothers gain.

Feels like year on year the 2mile hurdle ranks are getting better and better.
By:
buddeliea
When: 13 Dec 10 08:00
Re Sublimity.

If you looked at the previous Supreme you would have noticed him finishing fairly close up 4th after getting hampered quiet badly coming down the hill.He may well have won the race had that not happened,and would not have been 220 on here the start of his CH season.Sometimes they can be spotted,and i always keep festival on tape for the following year,never know it might happen again!!
By:
aka
When: 13 Dec 10 11:15
Yes, there were clues to Sublimity. The one you mention, Budd, some of the noises from good sources in Ireland, the horse's quite good flat rating, an understanding of where things were with the horse's fitness and health.

Though, of course, none of those clues could be gleaned from the CH trials that season. It can be a bit of quandary. You can't afford to ignore the trials and need to study the form of those races carefully, but in doing so it perhaps easy (certainly for me) to become too honed in on that type of analysis and in the process miss some clues that are floating around in different spheres altogether.

Detroit City, Sizing Europe, Binocular (in 2009), and arguably Go Native last March(or maybe KK), were the form picks from the seasonal trials in the last four renewals, and not one a winner.
By:
buddeliea
When: 13 Dec 10 11:24
Its always tricky re form during the season,as horses for the CH are trained to peak on that day.Plus a lot dont run against each other till the race.One of the reasons why we love Cheltenham i think,its bl00dy difficult but very satisfying when working it out with success.
By:
CVByrne
When: 13 Dec 10 13:30
aka Go Native got injured in the champion and so did Sizing Europe in his year. So you can forgive yourself  if you backed either.

Punjabi and Katchit were perfectly goods e/w bets based on their form.

Sublimity was tricky, but could have been a vase made for backing him ew as budd says. Inca and Hardy were simple before that.
By:
Harchibaldy
When: 13 Dec 10 15:00
Millhouse - I agree with what you wrote about extreme hold-up tactics but only now, with the benefit of watching the Bula! I would have agreed that he'd improve (before the race) but to THAT extent, then NO! He looked a different horse to me (and it seems to Hobbs as well) and W/D Sir - hope you filled your boots Happy
By:
Steeplechasing
When: 14 Dec 10 00:06
I watched the race again a few times. I think Menorah is a strong lay now. Despite the very positive visual impression, he rapped most hurdles with his hind legs, taking a panel out at least once.  He hung on the approach to several hurdles. The last was his cleanest jump.  Also,as the front three battled on the turn in, Menorah was scrubbed along for a few strides before picking up just as the gap came. I think a hot pace could easily find him out.

He's quite lightly made too and might well be muscled out of it if things get rough as they often do.  Finally, his trainer seemed surprised by the turn of foot - not a good sign imo.
By:
CVByrne
When: 14 Dec 10 00:10
I have serious doubts about what he beat in that race. A horse bred for 2 1/2 miles and a very very green novice 4yo on his 5th start of his career.
By:
Harchibaldy
When: 14 Dec 10 00:18
I won't doubt him again - he's made me look foolish enough. Steeplechasing - I think strong lay is a bit harsh.....he looks a bona fide contender.
By:
zilzal1
When: 14 Dec 10 00:27
I wouldn't be confident about Menorah's chances on faster ground at all, even in last years Supreme he was jinking around a bit at the last two flights and i would say he needs it more like saturday where it was about right for him
By:
Steeplechasing
When: 14 Dec 10 00:36
Steeplechasing - I think strong lay is a bit harsh.....he looks a bona fide contender.

He's a bona fide contender alright, but no 7/2 chance, far from it imo, which makes him a strong lay.
By:
Alvarado
When: 14 Dec 10 00:41
i think steeplechasing as been sipping back on a couple of bottles of vodka before you watched it back.cos i have never heard so much rubbish its a joke he is arguably the best jumper of a hurdle you,ve ever seen he is electric he was taking lenghts out of them at every hurdle.he travelled beautifully all the way you knob and did not hang once i think youre looking to slate him because u done your money on him or ur on peddlers cross/binocular and that performance scared the sh it out of you.what more can the horse do to please people like you he has just thrashed to soo called wonder horses fair and square and he made them look like selling platers trust me this horse will be a 10lb better horse on genuine good ground off a really fast pace and horses good enough to give him a lead to the last unlike sat race.

He is a tip top hurdler hes got everything and he is only 5 brillant horse
By:
Harchibaldy
When: 14 Dec 10 00:47
Steeplechasing - fair point then, as regards an ante-post proposition but I make a point of remembering when I've been stung - he's a top horse. PS - are you still cutting & pasting? Grin
Alvarado - he dared to disagree with you? You just couldn't resist calling him 'a knob' could you? Grin FWIW, I don't think the ground's an issue with Menorah at all, but 10lb improvement? Who's on the sauce did you say? Laugh
By:
Alvarado
When: 14 Dec 10 00:53
we,ll see he basically made up loads of rubbish or dosent know anything about racing cos even a blind man can see how well the horse jumps and the way he demolished those good horses on sat was a brillant performance if cue card had done that everyone would be hailing a superstar and know would be knocking the form
By:
buddeliea
When: 14 Dec 10 07:52
Alvarado,
he did rap a couple of hurdles and did indeed knock one right over,so he aint the best jumper you will ever see,although as he showed at the last he also can jump them well.
He is a major player though.
By:
aka
When: 14 Dec 10 12:03
Zilkal - that is an interesting point about the ground with Menorah. The trainer says the horse is better on good ground, though that certainly doesn't mean the trainer has it right. Is it that you think he might not act as well on drier ground or that his strengths are better served by good to soft going (or maybe both)? It is an interesting angle to discuss, I think.

CV - good points. There were certainly some clues in the form study from the seasonal trials that would have helped, though I think I would still want to maintain that a literal reading of the form would more likely have pointed you in the wrong direction in finding the winners as opposed to the other place horses (albeit accepting a degree of bad luck for backers of Sizing Europe particularly). A win acca on the last four winners at SP would have been settled at a little over 40,000/1 - a return conventional form analysis, on its own, is just not geared up to deliver, or else the bookies would be working for us and not the reverse.

If you throw in Hardy Eustace's two wins, for a sixfold win acca the return would be over 7 million to one. In other words, you would have a far better chance of winning the scoop 6 most weeks with one dart than picking those six winners of the CH, despite the amount of form study that is lavished on the big race and the high quality of the form that is being analysed.

It is a dilemma. Conventional form study is one of the few tools we have as punters, but it is such a double-edge sword and, arguably, it often proves much more the friend of the bookie than the punter, even in the hands of skilled form readers.

I often think form study, rather like trends study, needs to know its place. If it is allowed too much influence when making judgements about horses, it becomes the snake that bites you. How you keep it in its place and not be over-influenced by it, when it is such an important tool for the punter, is an issue we all struggle with I guess.
By:
Alvarado
When: 14 Dec 10 12:04
HE DID NOT KNOCK ANY HURDLES WATCH IT BACK AGAIN AND JUST WATCH MENORAH ALL THE WAY ROUND
By:
eric_morris
When: 14 Dec 10 12:12
aka ... interesting points, for me antepost is not about form reading, not about after-timing ratings, it is about experience of spotting an exceptional facet of a horse and instinctively projecting that ability into the future with regards antepost races. By the time the ratings boys have been there it is too late for antepost punters looking for a future Champion. It is your job to spot them, let the ratings boys wait until AFTER the race.
By:
eric_morris
When: 14 Dec 10 12:15
When someone starts quoting ratings on here with regards a horses FUTURE target under the all important conditions of that target or giving you their hand-timed blah blah I ignore it.
By:
buddeliea
When: 14 Dec 10 12:20
Just watched it again Alvarado.
He never really made a mistake,he did make contact with the top of a couple but not badly enough to effect his rhythm and did not plough through any.The one i thought he knocked over was in fact the horse next to him.

My apologies.
By:
aka
When: 14 Dec 10 13:13
Steeple - your post of 10.00 today. I think you raise some very interesting and worthwhile points to discuss there. I probably still see more points for Menorah than against him at this stage and having reviewed the race on Saturday several times.

I had some small concerns about his hurdling before the Bula and that remains the case now. How do you think he hurdled in the SN and the Aintree races? Those were probably the two quickest run races he has encountered, though he has yet to encounter a really strong end-to-end gallop comparable with that likely in the CH. His highest TS run was at Aintree. Do you think a stronger pace might see his hurdling in a better light, or are we talking about more fundamental problems in hurdling technique here?

You always worry about the lighter frame ones fighting for position and handling the hustle and bustle of a bigger field, though more so in chases possibly where pinching the right take off spot is so important for the jumping. There have been quite a few small ones among the recent CH winners though, including Binocular, Punjabi, and Katchit, all perhaps slightly smaller than Menorah. And the smaller ones often have the advantage of being that bit more nimble and quick footed to either avoid trouble in running or else recover well if momentum is lost through being baulked or finding a gap closed off.

The point about momentarily being scrubbed along (or would it be better described as shaken up, if that is not too fine a distinction) on the turn in, is interesting to analyse I think. Did the other two who were in front at that point just have the benefit of first run there, understandably leaving Menorah slightly outpaced for a few strides as he adjusted to what was happening in front, or do you think the horse might be one who has gears, but perhaps takes a little more time to access those higher gears than is ideal in the context of a fast run CH?

Do you see any comparisons/contrasts between what you describe with Menorah being scrubbed along momentarily on Saturday and PC being shaken up by his jockey coming around the home turn in the Neptune, before eventually finding his stride and powering on strongly up the hill to win that race? Both horses ran on impressively on the run in after getting a wake up call from their respective jockeys.

I thought there was a twinkle in the trainer's eye when he said he didn't think Menorah had such a turn of foot. I maybe wrong about that, but he doesn't wear that hat for nothing, I would say (he keeps plenty under it!)

I like the way Menorah keeps finding a way to win in somewhat contrasting circumstances and would give him some credit for not being significantly outpaced at any stage on a pretty good surface in the SN. I accept the SN wasn't run at the same end-to-end gallop as the CH, but all the same, when the pace picked up in the SN and came closer to the pace they go in the CH, Menorah withstood the test pretty well.

To summarise, the hurdling is a niggling concern for me; the idea that he might be vulnerable to being outpaced I would want to think more about - it warrants serious consideration; the fact he hasn't yet posted a really competitive Grade 1 time, does need factoring into his current price for the CH. He may well have no problem coping with a a really strong end-to-end gallop on the day, but we don't know that at this stage, unlike Binocular and KK who are proven under those conditions.

Marginally, I have a better gut feeling for Menorah than PC at this stage, though I see a great deal to like in both horses.
By:
duffy
When: 14 Dec 10 13:41
yep i too think with the trainer being surprised by the turn of foot he showed that we may have been looking at this horse from the wrong viewpoint.They never went a strong gallop and he produced a turn of foot...with the way the race was run we should have been seeing him plugging on behind what we perceived to be speedier types with hobbs bemoaning the lack of pace.It may be that the next time a pace maker is employed the instructions will be "stack them up"Grin
By:
CVByrne
When: 14 Dec 10 14:17
aka I need form lines with most of the runners to back any favourite in a champion hurdle and I need to be satisfied that the horses he beat were near their best.

So for me, Peddlers Cross has beaten starluck and an unfit binocular.

Menorah has beaten only one horse who will be opposing him again in March.

These two are unbackable at current odds given what they have beaten. You need to always look at things from the perspective of knocking what the horse has beat and then if this proves difficult then you may have the contender on your hands.

I believe it is vital to have form with most of the horses your selection will face especially  if he is short priced. As the race is littered with favs beaten by  horses they are facing for the first time.

As I said last year was an odd one, with the fav getting injured in the race to boot.

Punjabi had every right to beat CH and Binocular as he had no form with them

Katchit to turn around form with Osana given he was back on the old course, off levels and fresh. Sizing may have beaten both though.

Sublimity and Brave Inca to beat Detroit city.

Inca had confirmed himself the best of the irish, England had no good hurdlers.

Hardy was champ and had a great record at Cheltenham.

You need to know if your horse is worthy if his price given the opposition he will face, not given how good he looked in his trials beating horses he won't face in march.
By:
aka
When: 14 Dec 10 14:18
Yes, might try and put Kinkeel in there as a pacemaker next time.

It will be interesting to see what Mordin makes of the race. I seem to recall he was of the view that Menorah out speeded them more than out stayed them in the SN.
By:
duffy
When: 14 Dec 10 14:20
it'll be no bet then
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com