THE FIRST JUDGE IS A CROOK

fcuk me, the woman judge saved it!  how was that a split decision?

they have to be punting splits in america big time

so Mayweather v Bradley .........

Bradley was a close winner but nothing else. Minus the stupid commentry. He barely threw a shot most rounds and went for a walk

marquez points i would have done my brains pants shat tbh g.luck all

at least they didn't do a Burns-Beltran draw

Hope JMM retires now

altho i was thinkin in my head that karma was gonna get bradley their like the pacman woman judge

the first judge was just troiling lol

dan rafael is a troil

Bradley was a clear close winner. He didnt make sure with a lot of rounds thats all

Thought Bradley would revert to type for this fight.

Just watched the fights. First of all im gutted at Salido ko round 7! Had him rounds 1-6

Secondly, i watched the fights without knowing the results and im struggling to get with the people who think Bradley won easily. That was a really close fight, how anyone can slate the judge who gave it Marquez is beyond me. Bradley didnt do a great deal and you have to allow for the fact that Marquez was the aggressor most of the rounds. Bradley nicked it but there was nothing wrong with the Split decision.

Think too many people listening to the horrendous sky commentating...........absolutelly disgracefull from Jim Watt, Mcrory and Woodhall slating that judge.
Listen to Malignaggi at the end of the sky comm, even he seems to be alluding to the fact that the sky comms are getting a bit carried away here with Bradley.

Close fight and the right winner............controversial???? Not for me, nothing to see here.

Im astounded the studio sky guys were slating the judge as badly as they were. His scorecard was fine, maybe not how the majority of people had it but with the nature of the fight you couldnt slate it. Calling for him to be hauled before the authorities and asked to explain his decision is pathetic from the sky team.

They arent even consistent........remember the prizefighter where Ian John Lewis got the fighters mixed up thereby giving the wrong man the decision..........funny how they just brushed that under the carpet straight away.

1.2 on Bradley to win before the decision was announced suggested Sky were calling it correctly

bit of a chicken and egg scenario that though, comms influencing the punters etc. It was an awful commentary, Bradley flicking out a jab occasionally and staying out of range does not make for a convincing victory for me. You'd have thought it was a whitewash the way Halling was goin on. I thought he just about it won it but he couldn't really argue if it had been scored a draw. Its a decent resume Bradley is building but he's a touch grim to watch.

HBO clowns were all over Bradley as well, commentary only reason the odds were so lopsided at the bell.  Had it a draw but have to admit I drifted in and out of consciousness during some rounds.  Another farcical main event showcasing boxing as a joke, more action in random sparring at your local club than in that fight.

Bradley dominated that scrap throughout. The commentary team were spot on. I barely gave Marquez 2/3 rounds. Boxing is a skill, a noble art. Marquez was like a bar room brawler who couldn't hit the side of a bus from the inside.