|
By:
£30,000
|
|
By:
Trained off, dodgy pedigree. I think 15k would do it, tops.
However using this years must have logarithms, guess the yearling average and pitch the fee just above this. At all times the mare owner must be shafted. . . . |
|
By:
Fair point PM
Mastercraftsman stood for 20k this year so I factored in an extra 5k for the "Fast son of Galileo" However I may not have factored in that surely stud fees will decrease next year. Maybe I pitched 5k too high |
|
By:
I agree here with Pot M,The way Coolmore's sires have sold this year 15k looks about right for him,but I can see him being 20k,his connections will be aware they need a horse that's wanted as right now they are short of them.30k imo is far too much at that price they will scare breeders away who are already jittery of spending big bucks on stallions.
|
|
By:
Way over rated as race horse, won 2 sub standard GR 1's. His dam line is very poor. He was never given a proper opportunity to run over his optimum trip of 1m 4f. Best two runs were in the Derby and strong finishing win against Twice Over. He is a stayer masquerading as a miler. Anyone who falls for the "Coolmore" hype deserves what they get. A fee of £7.5k would be a fair price.
|
|
By:
Might they market him as the "cheap" way into the succesful galileo bloodline? As such I'd think they'd market him at 20k when I think 10k would be far more appropriate in my opinion but I'm probably wrong.
|
|
By:
new approach started at 30k, teofilo 40k they may pitch rvw at 20k i think as a "face price".
|
|
By:
I'm thinking around €22500 as he does over speed to in a different way to any other sire that has retired to coolmore in recent years. We will be sending him a couple of mares as he offers a nice way of getting to galileo. He was i talented horse and i'm sure he is going to be very well received. Just to say i think mastercraftsman fee this year was reasonable enough to be honest
|
|
By:
Have you had your 'phone call from the boys Rip Van?As I knew they would ,maximise the Galileo aspect to death minimise the moderate pedigree,I'm not sure if we will send him any yet he has been on the list but we are now thinking again,Coolmore sires are not wanted this year apart from Galileo.
Mastercraftsman imo in this climate looks top heavy plus he's not such a great looker I reckon a lot of breeders will get burnt fingers with him. |
|
By:
No we ahven't been talking yet but wont be long. The galileo of rip van winkle is the aspect that really catches the imagination so rightly so that they should max it. PD you've got to remember that coolmore sires could be all the rage next year
Mastercraftsman was better than his sire, was tough consistant and was very fast, looks wouldn't bother me much then |
|
By:
They indeed might be all the rage its not the first time they did it before with Fasliyev,Looks do bother me because as you know M'craftsman is leggy and on the plain side,when you sell if its not great looking doubt you will make much of a return,Excellent Art got some very poor sales.
|
|
By:
See this is what i dont agree with. We're trying to breed racehorses not show horses looks dont matter when your on the racecourse when selling it helps to have a nice looking sort but if Mastercraftsman does well with his stock on the track his looks or his progenies looks dont matter
|
|
By:
We are all trying to breed runners Rip Van,but with your point above you are obviously not trying to sell a first crop foal/yearling of Mastercraftsman,and remember even if he is successful as a sire the better looking ones of his will always out sell the not so good looking ones.
|
|
By:
As Prima says Rip, it's not necessarily an aspect any of us is particularly happy with, but boy it's got to be at the top of the wish list with book sizes as they are. The massive proportion of unprofitable foals/yearlings in any stallions book is the horror we are all running from. The beauty pageant is all important.
And actually it's probably a bit less offensive really than we think. By and large, best bred = best looking = most commercial = best runner! |
|
By:
One of the most basic rules with breeding horses especially commercial breeding is that you always want a good looking individual,whenever you choose a stallion you should try to always go and look at him,that way you can assess his good points and bad ones,then compare him to your mare always trying to physically 'upgrade'her the result being hopefully a smashing looking individual that there will be if all goes well a ready market.
Countless times we hear of good prices being made form stock with only moderate pages,because those foals/yearlings are superb lookers,anyone who selects stallions simply on form discounting his conformation is imo heading for a very costly and naive mistake. |
|
By:
**from**
|
|
By:
http://www.windsorparkstud.co.nz/Stallions/Mastercraftsman.aspx
I like the look of Mastercratsfman from this pic..doesn't look particularly leggy to me |
|
By:
Its good that we all have different views when assessing potential stallions,Mastercraftsman was one on the list to use this spring........that was until we looked at him,at the time you could of driven a bus under him,its good to view these colts when they retire as nine times out of ten that is what your resulting foal/yearling will look like,stallions can look a lot better with time being able to 'let down'he imo is not a typical Danehill Dancer physically,only time will tell if we made the right decision,not that it matters but being a grey put me off a touch.With that 'photo BSB look at the clever placing of him,the shadow hides his bottom line.
|
|
By:
BSB I too spotted that photo.
I was nigh on amazed that Mastercraftsmen looks like that already. What do they say about Kate Moss and the camera loving her? I think they are using the same stylist! I went to see the horse with an old friend who's opinion is very sound. We both thought the horse ordinary, on the leg and a poor walker. Every person who I have spoken to subsequently was pretty much in accord. The picture though is a conundrum. Assuming they haven't been too busy with the airbrush I don't think I gave the horse enough leeway allowing for him still being a 3yo. I bet he still doesn't walk though! |
|
By:
Does anyone know which stallions they intend to use next year for definite or will the stallions nominations price play a major part
|
|
By:
I cannot make any decisions Rip Van until after the December sales.
Fees will be crucial (as ever!) but at the moment I am thinking about Showcasing, Equiano, Royal Applause, Kyllachy, Medician, Exceed and Excel, Paco Boy, Starspangledbanner, Rip Van (the equine) and Makfi. I won't travel to Ireland for a cheapy, but you have a few of those over there that would appeal. Don't expect that list to get written in stone any time soon! How are you getting on with your cogitations? |
|
By:
I doubt many breeders have settled on their stallion choices atm,saying that we have with some of them,the better mares are the easiest to decide, we have most of these into their sires already.
The hardest ones are the 20k and under brigade but there are some good sorts going to stud this year,we are not using Coolmore as much as we have but I am told we will be using Rip Van Winkle,like Pot M we will use Showcasing as he is the best bred son of OD at stud better page than Arcano but he is also on the list to use. Price must come into it no-one in this market could claim to be commercial if price did not indeed play a major part in their decision. |
|
By:
Fee's are crucial with us aswell but on our list so far to name just a few Rip Van Winkle, Starspanglebanner, Arcano, Shamardal (every year so far),Invincible Spirit(might be to expensive though), Acclamation, Nayef. Then on the jumping side theres only a few mares so it'll be between Milan, Court Cave, Robin Des Champs, Oscar and Westerner. There are many more stallions on the list and it will really depend on stud fees
Among the few mares we've bought one is foal to Mastercraftmans thats why i was trying to see what ye all thought about him , i still dont change my opinion though. |
|
By:
Possibly Choisir or Fastnet Rock as well depends on what one of the mares has. I was ment to ask is HRE def gone cause i think it's only Ad Valorem and Ivan Denisovich that were shipped out i could be wrong though.
|
|
By:
Rip van, Nayef is a brave choice. Any particular reasoning behind that? I've got a mare with big pedigree reasons to use him, but I still don't feel too inclined!
|
|
By:
I too have not heard for sure yet if HRE has in fact gone,but tbh I've not asked he is not one I'd use again even if he is still at Coolmore,Fastnet Rock is one that we may use again.With Mastercrafstman I would be happy to buy a mare in-foal if she is a nice sort (not too big and she'd need to be strong)but I'd also want to make sure she gets good sorts herself,good luck Rip Van hope she goes the right way for you.
![]() |
|
By:
Using Nayef wouldn't be a bad option for me because it is a cross that has worked well before with the family so i'd say that i might send one over to him. HRE is off the list for me aswell he's been such a disappointment was just wondering was he gone.
She's a lovely mare that i bought in foal to Mastercraftsman and she suits him well so i'm looking forward to her foaling. Could you think PD or PM of any stallions under €25000 that would suit a nice strong mare from a good family that isn't really related to much of the stallions standing in Ireland |
|
By:
What about using Acclamation?If your new mare is a good sort then he may be the ideal sire for her as he is sure to get you a 2y'old and is very commercial right now,is her pedigree fast and early or is she more of a middle distance type?
|
|
By:
From your description Rip Van, it's just a case of pinpointing the few stallions she couldn't visit.
Mind you, by the time you get the proven/unproven question out of the way as Prima Donna says it's a difficult place to be. Smart mares dictate where they need to be. Cheap mares do much the same and the stakes aren't as scarey but the up to 25 granders are not so straightforward. If you are really fond of her then I quite like the challenge of staying away from the norm, particularly if she is a litle different and then you could end up with a filly to keep that could go absolutely anywhere. If you are able to divulge a broodmare sire that would give more of a clue! |
|
By:
She was a miler same as most of her family. I was thinking of sending a different one to Acclamtion never thought about using him on this one. Have you used him before?
|
|
By:
I don't know if Slick has used Acclamation off the top of my head but I'd say she more than likely has,I have seen him to my eye he is like his own sire a nice sort but you could say a bit wiry using a strong mare to my mind is the key with this stallion,sure to speed her up a bit I would think.
|
|
By:
has High Chaperal made anyones list? i sense the tide is turning on him with his aussie exploits, he is fairly priced and is very like stablemates Montjeu and Galileo
|
|
By:
I have a mare in-foal to High Chap DMCK with the resulting foal prob being kept but not sure will we send him one next year i'd say his fee could rise on his southern hemisphere success
|
|
By:
They love him in Australia - which makes we wonder whether they will simply relocate him permanently there. Remember Danehill made it there first and then he picked up over here - but he wasn't the instant success here like he was over there. So maybe HC will pick up here - or is the style of racing in Australia better for his progeny? I wouldn't have thought so?
I suspect they gave him better mares to start with in his Australian crops (with the faster Danehill and Star Kingdom line mares) possibly matching him well. Coolmore never seemed to have him on their star list in the way they did with Galileo when he retired. |
|
By:
His profile has remained stronger than I think a lot of us imagined DMCK.
However he has had only 17 winners in GB/Ire this year if the Racing Post is to be believed and therein lies the rub. He is very inconsistent. His sales figures have held up well this year which is very interesting, but he remains an unimposing type of horse who would be very scarey to use. I imagine his fee must be pretty flexible as there is a high degree of risk there. His prowess down under is one of the most interesing facets of the game right now in my opinion. Could there have been a much worse fit in the beginning? Montjeu too has surprised me no end. While the slightly speedier Galileo doesn't cut it!! It's endlessly fascinating ![]() |
|
By:
Montjeu and High Chap both started off in NZ; unlike Galilieo. I think this is significant in terms of access to good staying families.
|
|
By:
Ah ha. I defer. . .
![]() |
|
By:
Would it be significant that beyond sprint distances, IMVHO the standard of racing in Australia would be below that in Europe, America, Japan and Hong Kong
|
|
By:
?
|