|
By:
"hence 3.5 is stupid."
So LAY LAY LAY you say? |
|
By:
I just can't see her picking up more than 2 noms next week - JJ and Dave.
Everyone else either likes her or will feel bad about nominating her when she's not full strength / had a tough week. |
|
By:
or more importantly may think it will look bad if they nominate her (JJ may even fall into this category)
|
|
By:
But then there is the chance that the winner of the S+R task will put her up and I doubt she would survive against anyone.
|
|
By:
Nobody would nom her or put her up. She gets at least a week's respite.
|
|
By:
If they feel bad / don't want to look bad nominating her in private - they're not going to pick her in front of everyone.
|
|
By:
The kid in school with a broken leg always becomes popular for a bit.
|
|
By:
Rachel rather good value in this case?
|
|
By:
To go, that is, of course..
|
|
By:
Yup she's my biggest green.
|
|
By:
Possibly. Also unlikely to perform well in a vote to save, as well as evict.
I'm not sure how likely it is she'll be up again. I think Corin's nomination may be key - so it's worth keeping an eye on whether Corin and Rachel start getting along better. |
|
By:
I doubt she's suddenly going to become not annoying, and she's an easy nomination (being a newbie), so don't see why she wouldn't be up again.
|
|
By:
Keeley likely to be exempt even if she does return? Market is bonkers.
|
|
By:
RACHEL....CHAARRGGE!
|
|
By:
Rachel is doing well in this task and endearing herself to the group.
|
|
By:
Yeh, but wait until she talks loudly again just before they have to nominate, and when they need an easy second nom... [;)]
|
|
By:
ghatroonh Joined: 13 Jun 10
Replies: 184 21 Jul 10 17:21 Considering the probability she may not even be in the house next week is quite high. then factor in that she'd have to be nominated (people may feel awkward nominating someone in her state) then take into account there would be a mental based S&R - and given shes one of the more intelligent ones - has a high chance of winning. Add in potential sympathy - potential lack of HL's coverage - combined with the fact she hasn't done much wrong to date (no where near the levels of Keeva, Shabby, Sunshine) and the audience is largely very fickle. Hence 3.5 is stupid. agree with the majority of the points you make but..... i got 4.6avg on here this week pre noms they had keeva still in the market (who was favs) who is now gone & we didnt know if keeley would get put up or not |
|
By:
Does anyone know which bookies have/have not voided on this eviction, save me traipsing through them all?
|
|
By:
Seems like BB are probably glad to have an excuse to cancel
a nomination involving two of their carefully selected newbies against a likely more popular old-timer rather than risk yet again losing a later entrant at the first opportunity. |
|
By:
and the only people not shouting about what a farce / fix the eviction was already are those desperate to get rid of Keeley.
|
|
By:
Not at all, I thought it was ridiculous they cancelled her noms.
The eviction was a farce long before the ankle snapped |
|
By:
Sorry ghat, misread that
|
|
By:
no probs - I should have wrote it better.
|
|
By:
PEJ was away it should be noted. Surely it would have been better handled if he'd been there
|
|
By:
ttt
|
|
By:
Thanks Johnnie
![]() |
|
By:
Just laid Corin at 7.6 for eviction.
|
|
By:
If i backed John James to be evicted how can the market carry over with the irish bird out of the betting. Surely my bet is void, as the market i bet on does not exist, and the eviction was cancelled, and there is another week now to form an opinion. Big Brother is not Horse Racing where you can bet on form line's and it is not an ante post market where you lose your money on non runner's. Also if Keeley is removed from the eviction process what happen's then!!!!
|
|
By:
There will be a 6th eviction at some point.
|
|
By:
randy100 - thats the way it works on BB evictions, always has done. People have laid 1000 shots when they avoided nomination only for one of the potential evictees to be chucked out for rule breaking resulting in that week's eviction being cancelled and the 1,000 shot getting evicted the following week.
|
|
By:
And then there was kenneth...
![]() |