Forums

Big Brother 11

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 121 comments are related to the topic:
Forum Champion

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 121
By:
A1 Bionic
When: 14 Jun 10 23:21
AR still seething away Laugh
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:24
You're out of your depth.

Go back to last years Big Brothers posts and see who backed Sophie at top Betfair price and didn't lay off.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:27
yet no1 wants 2 take a bet.

not even the bookies (cheps) Cry
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:32
So let me get this right.

I've effectively backed John James to beat the following:
Steve
Josie
Ife
Nathan
Govan
Dave

at 9/2.

He's currently about 9/2 to win the whole show.

This makes me a 'donk', yes?

Yet you want to back one of other runners, all of which are bigger prices, to beat all of the above and John James at 5/2?

Are you some kind of retard?
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:32
lets get 1 thing straight hayemaker, i dont know you, i dont like you, and i can speak on behalf of your competitors, that thats a poor show. waiting then picking the fav isnt in the nature of this. however, it bodes well for them as that is a horrible selection. i dont care if you backed soph top price or sucked off a donkey, if you want to take me on, we can go toe to toe, im show cheps would set up a market, you have your choice ill have my choice, he can go 5/6 the two, we agree a stake, and he'll profit either way and i take your cash. you have the fav, you up for it? guessing no. all mouth as i suspected.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:33
sure* show
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:35
lets see if you'll take this 'retard' on.

wd on being a prat. any of them could have gone with the fav first thing and layed him 6.0 here for a risk free bet. totally against the spirit of the whole thing.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:40
Angela, you are a plantpot.

I waited to form my opinion, everyone knew the rules (well those of us that were selected LOL)

I'm sure its not sure its something Cheps would be interested in doing, why would he? Is it not a bit childish?

You only want to do it to try and boost your ego because you were left out, awwwwww (insert Hug smiley)

That said, if Cheps did wan't to do it, I'd match any stake you want and take you to the cleaners you absolute bum.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:42
any of them could have gone with the fav first thing and layed him 6.0 here for a risk free bet. totally against the spirit of the whole thing.

Back at 5.5 and lay at 6.0 for a free bet?

Can you explain to me how I go about doing that?

You are without doubt the biggest mongalongadingdong on this site.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:44
cheps is a bookie, if he can make a free buck or two for his organisation for 10 mins work then im sure he would.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:49
such a mong and a retard that you're running scared of me. no probs. got your number.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:51
Can you not read?

That said, if Cheps did wan't to do it, I'd match any stake you want and take you to the cleaners you absolute bum.

or are you conveniently ignoring it?
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:52
i'll pick two runners in the market which equate to the % chance of nathan, i'll take 4/5, you can have evens.

you want to take this mong/retard on? or are you too scared?

you name your max stake i'll take you on, the higher the more likely chep will accept.

no doubt you will run scared, no problems.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:52
john james* = nathan
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:53
what on earth are you on about?
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:54
those are my terms. i pick selection(s) which equate to the same % chance as your selection(s) and we go whatever stake you want, you can have Evens, i will take 4/5. unless you're scared of this 'retard' (not PC btw).
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:55
Let me get this right.

You want a match bet.

You have Nathan

I have John James

your price is 4/5

my price is Evens?
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 14 Jun 10 23:56
running scared. no problemo. thought you would.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 14 Jun 10 23:57
Running scared? stop being thick on purpose.

Answer the question.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:00
You seem to have struggled here. A match bet is indeed what is being proposed. One where our selections are equal in % chance according to Betfair. You can have Evens, i'll have 4/5. Whoevers selection goes the furthest wins. No worries that you don't want to take this 'mong' on, i knew you'd run away too scared.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:01
I'll bet you as much as you want.

Seriosuly, as much as you want.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:04
So you would have John James (17.5%) and i would have say Nathan Ben and ife (17.5% combo) [thats not my final choice]. And whoever went furthest would win.

Sorry for reiterating just you seemed to struggle. Sense you will run scared.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:08
as i suspected running scared against the 'mong' stoke 'retard'. typical.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:11
LOL

Brilliant

honestly, that was pure genious.

Pick someone out who you think won't take you on.

band about figures of 2k to scare them off and make out your some kind of big shot.

keep posting that they are scared and you 'understand' why they wont take you on.

when you finally realise you are out of your depth(i did warn you), you start changing the rules.

Come back when you grow a pair
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:12
actually, not that you will do it anyway as your running scared, all talk as i suspected, but not sure that is fair on you the current proposal. it'd have to be a if the selection wins style market. if none win we'd get refunded and we could obviously agree a wee service charge to cheps.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:16
you called me a retard and a mong, and then won't take me on under a fair fight. my wit versus your own. appears you are scared my wit will outdo yours. no worries, knew you would. get back to me if you grow a pair and will take this 'mong' on. knew you wouldn't, funny as feck really. call someone a 'mong' but won't go toe to toe with them. pmsl.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:18
Go back to your original posts, its completley different to your last one.

Anyway, have you been paid out on Ricky Whittle yet?
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:20
pmsl. take that as an official backdown. scared of going toe to toe with the 'mong'. fantastic. shame, would have loved to have taken your money.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:22
further proof you have used this just for a free bet. really pretty pathetic. think you need to grow a pair sunshine. no doubt the regulars will defend ya, but they know i know that what i've said will resonate with them. really poor show by you, shameful stuff.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:22
How much will you win when (not if) Azerbajan win Eurovision 2010.

Guess who said this?

Yes, thats right, the forum fool.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:24
Angela Rebecchi Joined: 15 Sep 02
Replies: 11943 23 May 10 14:29 
Tipped them on here at 2.2, now 1.6 for top 10. Got an avg position at 2.9 on them, also got quite a few mates to lump on.

Thought the 2nd rehearsal was pretty good but a shame the choir don't walk on to the stage ala the original.

Are you on? What are your thoughts? Not laying off, at the price i had them at, and that was being prudent i thought so running this train now. Cool

if it wins i retire btw (a reason for 5LL to root it on i imagine Grin)



Another gem

Out in the SemisLaughLaugh
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:25
the euro bail out might have changed one's book somewhat. no worries you don't want this bet. a fair fight isn't your thing. if you change your mind, let me know. i will take you on any stake you want, no probs, and even give you the better odds against the 'mong' 'retard' 'fool'. wow, and still he backs down. priceless.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:28
Oh dear. Actually a very good Eurovision for me. Pleased my ear was correct though, 2.9 into 1.55 isn't bad though my logistics needs a thorough good looking into admittingly.

You appear to be limited in awareness, but the more you try to mock me, the less bawsy and immensely more pathetic you appear in not taking me on, wit vs wit and you backdown. Priceless.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:29
Listen Angela, go back to what you were saying.

You said:

what a donk. wait max time and select the fav. cheps, let me join, i'll have 2k on myself at 5/2 to beat these donkeys.



Did you want us to change the rules so you could half the field?

As I said, you picked someone who wasnt scared of the stakes you were banding about and you changed the goalsposts.

go back to what you said and il bet you want you want.

Cheps knows my mate, he will confirm im not scared, il bet you whatever you want.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:30
Was far from a very good one, was profitable though. Nowhere near the one i was hoping for, which was Sweden (50s into 16s) winning.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:31
2.9 into 1.55?

You said in the post you wern't laying off, you were letting this train runLaugh
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:32
Cheps knows my mate, he will confirm im not scared, il bet you whatever you want.

you are priceless.

you label me every name under the sun.

i've carved up a fair market, giving you the better price, and you refuse to take me on.

i dont think your running scared, its no longer based in the field of conjecture, it is definitie.

you are running scared.

as i said, no worries, knew you would.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 15 Jun 10 00:37
i didnt lay sweden top 10 off, i could have, and under normal circumstances probably would have layed half off. but went against my morals as several of my friends had also backed them on the HS and as such were running their bet. sweden in the top 10 market were a big loss on here and the HS. i won trading them o/r and my o/r winnings and other place bets easily covered such losses. all wholly irrelevant. more skirge and more amusements as to why you're running scared. grow some balls and take me on. my wit vs your wit.
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:53
Right, lets sort this out.

You originally wanted 5/2 on Nathan(i presume, one runner anyway) to beat John James and 7 runners.

Is that not correct?
By:
THE HAYEMAKER
When: 15 Jun 10 00:54
John James and 6 other runners*
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com