Basketball
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Does anyone know why Indiana are so short?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 198
|
By:
no clue..hi all btw
|
|
By:
Because d Williams is out
|
|
By:
Game of the day is Chicago 1.85 v 2.16 Spurs, just hearing from all reports, Spurs were flat yesterday without 2 key players, think CHicago at home might have more to play for. I will be following Clippers V 76ers
|
|
By:
76ers 2.80 v 1.55 Clippers
|
|
By:
D WILL HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN TILL AFTER ALL STAR. CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHY CHICAGO WENT FROM 2.3 TO 1.85 HAS TONY PARKER BEEN SHOT. DONT GET ME WRONG I THINK PRICE SHOULD BE MORE EVEN BUT THE SLIDE SUGGESTS SOMEONE IS NOT PLAYING OR ROSE IS BACK OR NOAH SOMETHING IS UP.
|
|
By:
west coast what do you mean flat?
|
|
By:
their team lacked spark in the loss against Brooklyn last night
|
|
By:
They grubbed Brooklyn last night!
|
|
By:
Sorry gubbed!
|
|
By:
they were down 6/7 and won by almost 20 wce ?
|
|
By:
i thought they played well?!
|
|
By:
How much of a factor is fatigue in the NBA, really? They're all athletes that are accustomed to playing for successive days due to the number of matches and the scheduling, and each player only plays a portion of each match. Add to that all the breaks that occur during quarters, between quarters and halves, and a significant amount of time spent pretty much standing around whilst the ball is in play, on both offence and defence, I really don't think that accumulated fatigue (especially from an extra '15' mins) can be very much of a factor.
I am no expert and I don't really know very much about basketball at all but I honestly don't see how tiredness could be much of a factor in this sport. |
|
By:
hmm i dunno its tough to say..always see odd results but i hink the spurs will play well
|
|
By:
My post above was more written in response to the suggestion that fatigue could be a leveller in the match between Boston and Charlotte, when there is a clear gulf between the two teams' abilities and form.
|
|
By:
MAYBE NOT TONIGHT BUT THERE HAVE BEEN OCCASSIONS WHERE TEAMS ON BACK TO BACKS JUST GAVE UP AFTER 1ST QUARTER. SPURS PLAYING 3RD GAME IN 4 CHICAGO WON AT UTAH WHICH WASNT EASY. ALL SEEMS TO POINT TO A CLOSE GAME. IM LEANING CHICAGO HERE
|
|
By:
Wait it was the other thread where the Boston/Charlotte discussion was going on
 |
|
By:
what thread
|
|
By:
Look at the forum
|
|
By:
and im not sure feels like a trap i mean bobcats suck.i want to take -4.5
|
|
By:
but il wait till it goes live see if i can get better
|
|
By:
Celtics just jumped up 5 ticks
|
|
By:
game started ive just put it on
|
|
By:
CELTICS WILL LOSE YOU MONEY TONIGHT
|
|
By:
reasons?
|
|
By:
Lol, Celtics 10 Mullens 10
|
|
By:
Celtics should just get there toughest guy to smack Mullens in the face and win 100-0
 |
|
By:
heh
|
|
By:
*their
|
|
By:
He's scored all of Bobcats' points
|
|
By:
Or had at 10-10, anyway
|
|
By:
BOOOOM NO PARKER AND GOT CHICAGO AT 1.9
|
|
By:
IM NOT IT WAS JUST A THROW AWAY COMMENT BASED ON THEM PLAYING 3OTS LAST NIGHT
|
|
By:
Alright. It's just that 'will lose you money' makes it seem like you think it is a certainty; perhaps the caps doesn't help
|
|
By:
price on boston is scary guys... why so high against a team like charlotte? its true they had 3 OTs last night, but still....
|
|
By:
I JUST CANT TRUST MY MONEY ON A TEAM WHO IS KNOWN TO LOSE EASILY ON THE ROAD TO SHOWER TEAMS
|
|
By:
still.. those guys are on a 7 game winning streak, and they played some good teams... they also improved a lot after rondo's injury, ironicly...
|
|
By:
i find 1.64 too good, but im really afraid to put my money on them.. the price is too big, too suspicious
|
|
By:
and we are talking about bobcats here.. these guys are awful.. kemba walker deserves a better team
|