Australian
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
14 Nov 14
10:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Dec 08
must be the smallest mob in the world, everything is referred to a 'Trader" wanted 100 e/way at $9 and $3.20 in a 6 horse field
the place portion was ok
the max on the win portion was $93.75 leaving $6.25 to be referred, and DECLINED FFS
next race tri 1 horse to win 2 horses to fill places for $25 total $50
$18.76 placed
rest referred and declined
the place portion was ok
the max on the win portion was $93.75 leaving $6.25 to be referred, and DECLINED FFS
next race tri 1 horse to win 2 horses to fill places for $25 total $50
$18.76 placed
rest referred and declined
Show More
Why bother Betty the bat slasher?.Stick to betfair and the totes----dont stress guessing whether your gunna get on or whether your gunna get paid.
Its good when you provide these parasite ****s with horses to bet on and you can get jack **** on yourself.Tabs included.
What a hide these ****s have putting up prices first, suppose you can when you don't bet anyone.
Anything you do, even non-stop losing bets, they keep chopping you back harder and harder.
It's slow, very annoying and 90% of the time bets are declined. They just don't want anybody betting with them it seems so eventually you give up and go somewhere that lets you on.
It's slow, very annoying and 90% of the time bets are declined. They just don't want anybody betting with them it seems so eventually you give up and go somewhere that lets you on.
I backed a horse at $26 tonight and when the shortened it to $13 i barreled up. I then couldn't have any more on it, but they left the $13 up. WTF is that about?
BTBS
My MAIN gripe ... as you say ... they LEAVE the price there - but tell you NO MORE !!!
Given it's happened to me at two different shops - they are ALL as bad as each other :-(
There should be a FIXED PRICE EXCHANGE - money in a single account - each bookie sends its OFFERS in with VOLUME - we hit em with money from our account !!
TOO EASY !
My MAIN gripe ... as you say ... they LEAVE the price there - but tell you NO MORE !!!
Given it's happened to me at two different shops - they are ALL as bad as each other :-(
There should be a FIXED PRICE EXCHANGE - money in a single account - each bookie sends its OFFERS in with VOLUME - we hit em with money from our account !!
TOO EASY !
imagine going to the races.....bit of a rush to get on....bookie says you you you and you are on...and you NOTHING!
THEN LEAVE THE PRICE THERE????
would have been straight in the stewards room! and fined
THEN LEAVE THE PRICE THERE????
would have been straight in the stewards room! and fined
Nov 25, 2014 -- 1:12AM, trotman wrote:
BTBSMy MAIN gripe ... as you say ... they LEAVE the price there - but tell you NO MORE !!!Given it's happened to me at two different shops - they are ALL as bad as each other :-(There should be a FIXED PRICE EXCHANGE - money in a single account - each bookie sends its OFFERS in with VOLUME - we hit em with money from our account !!TOO EASY !
bookies.com.au
aka Bestbookies.
Think they are a group of WA bookies, that bet through this site. To bet with them, they must bet the odds they offer as long as it still matches their boards when the bet hits the site or they no longer have access.
To be fair, I think for the most part the only active bookie is Topsport, but certainly for WA races, and Satudays etc, there are a few on offer.
Can take your pick of the bookie you want, or load them up through something like DynamicOdds, and simply have access to the best offer.
Certainly a good idea, that looks after the punters. Would love something like that to take off, but the fact remains, bookies want to be able to pick and choose their clientele.
Isn't it strange that the locally owned Topsport keeps getting accolades,all justified for letting you on.
Now food for thought says but what about all the shrewdies taking overs and stripping the joint of any and all profit.
Gotta give it to Lloyd,he just works on the Bill W theory,let'em on.
Now food for thought says but what about all the shrewdies taking overs and stripping the joint of any and all profit.
Gotta give it to Lloyd,he just works on the Bill W theory,let'em on.
So if that happens why would the client
A)Take the price knowing they can get better elsewhere.
or
B)Do they take it knowing they can't get set elsewhere.
A)Take the price knowing they can get better elsewhere.
or
B)Do they take it knowing they can't get set elsewhere.
Done plenty of arbing with BB. Aus, UK, doesn't matter, they pop up daily.
For the record, Pinnacle (the "new" Aus bookie) that were supposed to be it and a bit, are a direct copy of Topsport odds.
They informed me that the reason they claim they have the best odds and let everybody on, is because they don't compare them with other bookies, because no other bookie lets anybody on, so therefore, their claim that they have the best odds must be correct.
They do give a personalised service though. When I emailed them at the beginning of their racing markets, I suggested that all the talk over the last few months that they would be worth the wait, was really just that, and that apart from offering nearly the worst odds in the country, they also were a direct clone of Topsport.
Apparantly that was enough for them to threaten me and try and close my account.
Fair question I thought.
Fair enough that most of the markets tend to get pretty close to each other, but when they are exactly the same, and then TS offer mistakingly 167.00 on a 16.00 horse, and of course Pinnacle follows suit, it doesn't take a genius to work out why.
And besides that, the talk of best limits, no banning, best odds, etc etc, my first bet was knocked back from 2000 liability to 1000, and was threatened with closed account within 2 days of their racing offering.
So why bother when you could just bet with Topsport?
For the record, Pinnacle (the "new" Aus bookie) that were supposed to be it and a bit, are a direct copy of Topsport odds.
They informed me that the reason they claim they have the best odds and let everybody on, is because they don't compare them with other bookies, because no other bookie lets anybody on, so therefore, their claim that they have the best odds must be correct.
They do give a personalised service though. When I emailed them at the beginning of their racing markets, I suggested that all the talk over the last few months that they would be worth the wait, was really just that, and that apart from offering nearly the worst odds in the country, they also were a direct clone of Topsport.
Apparantly that was enough for them to threaten me and try and close my account.
Fair question I thought.
Fair enough that most of the markets tend to get pretty close to each other, but when they are exactly the same, and then TS offer mistakingly 167.00 on a 16.00 horse, and of course Pinnacle follows suit, it doesn't take a genius to work out why.
And besides that, the talk of best limits, no banning, best odds, etc etc, my first bet was knocked back from 2000 liability to 1000, and was threatened with closed account within 2 days of their racing offering.
So why bother when you could just bet with Topsport?
The transcript of Steve Fletcher's testimony makes interesting reading.
He testified that the corporates ban any punter that loses less than 7%. That's their cut off point to determine a punter that knows what he's doing.
He also testified that that if you open a bowler account your initial bets should always be on tote based products as that gets you marked down as a mug.
He testified that the corporates ban any punter that loses less than 7%. That's their cut off point to determine a punter that knows what he's doing.
He also testified that that if you open a bowler account your initial bets should always be on tote based products as that gets you marked down as a mug.
BJT
I read somewhere that Pinnacle were in the process of buying Topsport. So they may be using the same software.
I read somewhere that Pinnacle were in the process of buying Topsport. So they may be using the same software.
got the dreaded message from bet 365 today
not sure why i am bothered they will still let me have .75 cents x $1.50 a runner tonight at GP
interestingly they do say restrictions apply except for NSW thoroughbreds so it does seem that that regulation is working
be good if all codes / states put that regulation in place
not sure why i am bothered they will still let me have .75 cents x $1.50 a runner tonight at GP
interestingly they do say restrictions apply except for NSW thoroughbreds so it does seem that that regulation is working
be good if all codes / states put that regulation in place
I don't blame Bet 365 or similar
They are a business and if they are allowed to do this, why not?
It's the racing authorities who need put minimum bet rules in place such as Racing NSW have for NSW thoroughbreds
They are a business and if they are allowed to do this, why not?
It's the racing authorities who need put minimum bet rules in place such as Racing NSW have for NSW thoroughbreds
I emailed hrnsw ceo john dumesny about bringing in minimum bet rules he said we are looking into it.
Something might happen in ten years time if we are lucky ffs.
Something might happen in ten years time if we are lucky ffs.
I just noticed their early markets for Globe today are all 135%. Previously they religiously put up 125%.
Not many overs with the extra %.
Not many overs with the extra %.
Craig The Speculator 19 Dec 14 05:20
I don't blame Bet 365 or similar
They are a business and if they are allowed to do this, why not?
Craig , legally I can fck the next door neighbours 17 year old daughter, Doesn't make it right.
whats legal ain't always moral!!
Business should be a level playing field.
1- on course bookies don't have the option of refusing business
2- why can a business offer one customer a product and not the next customer. ACCC (the toothless tiger) should be having a crack at these mobs
I don't blame Bet 365 or similar
They are a business and if they are allowed to do this, why not?
Craig , legally I can fck the next door neighbours 17 year old daughter, Doesn't make it right.
whats legal ain't always moral!!
Business should be a level playing field.
1- on course bookies don't have the option of refusing business
2- why can a business offer one customer a product and not the next customer. ACCC (the toothless tiger) should be having a crack at these mobs
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
trying to say more but there seems to be a character limit
Well i took Keeyang Steamer to win Vic Cup into Hunter Cup
Odds are $31 and $35 for $100
Odds should be $1085 but bet was accepted at Odds $424
I called up and they said if the horse wins Vic Cup then its odds will be fav, i said no it wont as different horses.
But they said Rules are rules if u back same horse.
I said what if horse that is $50 but comes from last and runs 2nd by a sht half head and runs the quickest last half ever why should it matter.
He just said you cant back same horse in doubles and if you do 60% Reduction.
So dont ry taking Beutide into Beutide.
Odds are $31 and $35 for $100
Odds should be $1085 but bet was accepted at Odds $424
I called up and they said if the horse wins Vic Cup then its odds will be fav, i said no it wont as different horses.
But they said Rules are rules if u back same horse.
I said what if horse that is $50 but comes from last and runs 2nd by a sht half head and runs the quickest last half ever why should it matter.
He just said you cant back same horse in doubles and if you do 60% Reduction.
So dont ry taking Beutide into Beutide.
always confused me that one Lyoddy
of course your double gets shorter if you win the 1st leg, but the others all get rougher. swings and roundabouts IMHO
of course your double gets shorter if you win the 1st leg, but the others all get rougher. swings and roundabouts IMHO
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
BARNEY
i think you might have a ... < ... or ... > ... sign in there that is hard up against the next character/number
put a space between the < or > and the next character/number it should be okay
i think you might have a ... < ... or ... > ... sign in there that is hard up against the next character/number
put a space between the < or > and the next character/number it should be okay
Castiron there will always be overs when the bloke framing the market has no idea.
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
What they will find is that the more % they put up the smarter the business they will get.
The only business they do will be on the over.
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up
35 years ago the bookies at Flemington would put up less than 110% and lay plenty of horses because every mug had a chance.
When BET365 eventually put up 150%+ they will only lay the 2 or 3 mistakes for the day,
the mistakes will be their worst results for the day. Even at 150+ mugs with no idea of the true odds will make mistakes.
The funny thing about 365 is that they put up odds with severe restrictions 12+ hours b4 a race, because, i thought, they want the "cheap tip" but it seems they don't want the cheap tip from someone with an idea, They want cheap tip from a mug.
A Reading from the Book Of Woody Chapter 3 Verse 2
"My children, % will not protect you, but immerse yourself in knowledge of the form and you shall reap abundant reward and the mortgage shall be paid "
Thebas that less than sign was the problem, Cheers
When BET365 eventually put up 150%+ they will only lay the 2 or 3 mistakes for the day,
the mistakes will be their worst results for the day. Even at 150+ mugs with no idea of the true odds will make mistakes.
The funny thing about 365 is that they put up odds with severe restrictions 12+ hours b4 a race, because, i thought, they want the "cheap tip" but it seems they don't want the cheap tip from someone with an idea, They want cheap tip from a mug.
A Reading from the Book Of Woody Chapter 3 Verse 2
"My children, % will not protect you, but immerse yourself in knowledge of the form and you shall reap abundant reward and the mortgage shall be paid "
Thebas that less than sign was the problem, Cheers
The key is finding someone with a losing account. It's surprising how much you can get on and for how long.
No wonder they won't bet anybody.
they have put up 135+% in every race at globe tomorrow
and there are several very very large overs
and a couple at 3-4 bucks that will run 25+
-----------------------
No matter how many monkeys they have having typing , I suspect they will never come up with anything like a true market.
they have put up 135+% in every race at globe tomorrow
and there are several very very large overs
and a couple at 3-4 bucks that will run 25+
-----------------------
No matter how many monkeys they have having typing , I suspect they will never come up with anything like a true market.
365 why do they bother putting up Sth OZ trots
a montha go they were putting up 125%
now 135+ and still a lot of massive overs IMHO
they won't bet anybody with any ability
and the Numpties won't cop 135+ ,(Numpties need a lead in , a clear cut fav, they far too many shorties for the geese to have a guess at)
a montha go they were putting up 125%
now 135+ and still a lot of massive overs IMHO
they won't bet anybody with any ability
and the Numpties won't cop 135+ ,(Numpties need a lead in , a clear cut fav, they far too many shorties for the geese to have a guess at)
They do get the 'cheap tip' about what people want to back by letting you on for not much. Generally it is very much not worth it. If you back anything early (in harness racing at least) Sky have an orgasm over the 'shortener' and the price gets destroyed late.
For just one example at Kilmore last night Bellmac Kody was backed from $7 to $5 fixed so started about $4.5 mid tote. If whoever backed it had waited until the last 2 minutes it would have started about $8 mid tote.
You essentially have 3 options for getting on for a lot in harness racing, and if you're being smart most will involve mid tote:
a) Back the fave or second fave early (it only takes about 300 to knock the price off) so it becomes Skys sacrificial lamb for the race and the lemmings will jump on. Lay it back very late if it shortens enough or just let it run. Smash whatever you really want to back in the last 2 minutes, too late for Sky to start squealing.
b) Wait until you see what the sacrificial lamb is. If you like it then get on fixed if you're fast enough or just forget the race. If you don't then back whatever you do like normally.
c) Get on with Tatts who actually let you on for a bit fixed.
For just one example at Kilmore last night Bellmac Kody was backed from $7 to $5 fixed so started about $4.5 mid tote. If whoever backed it had waited until the last 2 minutes it would have started about $8 mid tote.
You essentially have 3 options for getting on for a lot in harness racing, and if you're being smart most will involve mid tote:
a) Back the fave or second fave early (it only takes about 300 to knock the price off) so it becomes Skys sacrificial lamb for the race and the lemmings will jump on. Lay it back very late if it shortens enough or just let it run. Smash whatever you really want to back in the last 2 minutes, too late for Sky to start squealing.
b) Wait until you see what the sacrificial lamb is. If you like it then get on fixed if you're fast enough or just forget the race. If you don't then back whatever you do like normally.
c) Get on with Tatts who actually let you on for a bit fixed.
I can't get a tonne on anything above 5/2 with Tatts.
trotman
Have you thought about opening another account ?
Have you thought about opening another account ?
bet365 have taken the fixed odds down on the last 3
have they thrown in the towel?
have they sacked the MUPPET who frames their markets
Fcking Boguns IMHO
They obviously decided that I, along with numerous others are far too good for them, si what do they do sack us and keep the veggie framing the market.
Here's an idea , sack the spaz and offer the job to one of the guys who is obviously far superior to him
have they thrown in the towel?
have they sacked the MUPPET who frames their markets
Fcking Boguns IMHO
They obviously decided that I, along with numerous others are far too good for them, si what do they do sack us and keep the veggie framing the market.
Here's an idea , sack the spaz and offer the job to one of the guys who is obviously far superior to him
The site went off line. You could still get on via the phone.
Did you get any of the $41 Land Of Panaarm ?
Did you get any of the $41 Land Of Panaarm ?
The bloke who does their WA racing markets must have a job fr life they're miles out on some races, last week they bet 10's coco cash when it was resuming and having its first start for Durrant for fark sake and on top of all that they bet 1.85 Red Ora I didn't get on either of them at those prices but in all seriousness it's almost impossible to be that far out on such a consistent basis.
They bet $41 that winner yesterday. I priced it 9/2 equal favourite. Unfortunately they only wanted to bet me to lose $187.50 at that price. I was happy to be on at $16 and $11 when I could get on for more.
They must have more than one person doing their markets on SA trots. Some days their markets are a mile out.
They must have more than one person doing their markets on SA trots. Some days their markets are a mile out.
I make it about $6 ran on well and wide previous start and was a big possibility of early speed
I could get $10 to 25 cent,
I could get $10 to 25 cent,
They are absolutely irralevnet,last winner dartmoor on 363 $3.20 all betting
Betfair it was hard to get 2.8
so clearly the blokes wanting the 2.80 either don't have accs with 365 or can't get on
And no one can get on for enough at the 3.20 to make the crush worth while.
fcking muppets
Betfair it was hard to get 2.8
so clearly the blokes wanting the 2.80 either don't have accs with 365 or can't get on
And no one can get on for enough at the 3.20 to make the crush worth while.
fcking muppets
They have the odds up for tomorrow night, They are fcking legends they do the form WITHOUT checking for scratchings
When I had a preliminary look this morning I knew that ALWAYSWANTONO was scratched , 6 hours later 365 put it up at $1.75
are they absolutely clueless --Yes
Is it an attempt to rort with deductions--probably
When I had a preliminary look this morning I knew that ALWAYSWANTONO was scratched , 6 hours later 365 put it up at $1.75
are they absolutely clueless --Yes
Is it an attempt to rort with deductions--probably
how can they put up the sh1t they do?
some horses today have the decimal point 2 places to close to the left margin.
They put up 135% and still bar blokes , how the fck can their market framers be that poor.
they have a horse under $4 i have marked it 110/1
other intersetingly priced horses
race 1
east to west $3.25--3.30
art of gold $4.2---4.40
some horses today have the decimal point 2 places to close to the left margin.
They put up 135% and still bar blokes , how the fck can their market framers be that poor.
they have a horse under $4 i have marked it 110/1
other intersetingly priced horses
race 1
east to west $3.25--3.30
art of gold $4.2---4.40
Barney, did you see what they opened Freds A Safari Saturday night?
i have deleted that sheet, and can't remember
Race 2 seems very short No Renege
and #1 seems short for a horse coming off almost 2 year spell
and #1 seems short for a horse coming off almost 2 year spell
I have had something on Twiggy fixed odds with QLD tab
$8 FAS Sat night
Started a tick over evens
Head in hands man required
Started a tick over evens
Head in hands man required
EMBARRASED
Seem to have edged their opening markets up to 135 - 140%. Kilmore R5 tonight has opened at 147.5%.
I think this will actually work for them as enough mugs just want to get on, they don't care about value.
I think this will actually work for them as enough mugs just want to get on, they don't care about value.
It doesn't matter what they put up. they don't bet anybody.
they hav X/1 about horses and you can't get on with betfair at 80% of the quoted price,
to me this means not even the arbers can get on and do any business
they hav X/1 about horses and you can't get on with betfair at 80% of the quoted price,
to me this means not even the arbers can get on and do any business
i seen a message on dynamic odds that they had changed their T&C's so id say so (i cant get on with them so dont know personally).
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539