Forums

Australian

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
wonby10
05 Nov 13 03:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Aug 03
| Topic/replies: 667 | Blogger: wonby10's blog
Terry Bailey needs to step down. If it's not moving a stall to suit Black Caviar because the trainer isn't happy with the horse in the next stall it's letting horses run that have been treated on race day contrary to the Rules of Racing. Not only have the trainers of Dunaden and Tres Blue got questions to answer for treating the horses on race day but also Bailey for allowing them to run. What Next?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 45
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 03:21
Spot on wonby10, isn't it good that stewards aren't corrupt? I wonder if the tab said we will lose too much money by scratching them as a lot of the recreational punters would'nt be able to reinvest? Unbelievable
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 03:23
Wonder how Paul Beshara the trainer of Happy Trails feels right now, and all the other trainers that have had their horses scratched for breaking the same rule?
By:
Craig The Speculator
When: 05 Nov 13 08:05
"The young strapper inadvertently put some white heeler on his heels this morning and you know, he didn't realise. He just treated it as another day and didn't realise and so the stewards passed him fine to race."


Gai Waterhouse


easy going boss
By:
Lloydy Trots Man
When: 05 Nov 13 08:22
Its also Ok to Back another Horse when you riding in same race.
10 months should of been life and Jail.
Now rewarded with Biggest race.
Would of been outed for Life any other Country.
Was sickning to see him win.
By:
uncleee
When: 05 Nov 13 08:34
they're allowed to be treated on raceday with stewards permission
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 08:37
So you're saying they both asked for permission?
By:
CHANTECLARE
When: 05 Nov 13 08:55
Just a smoke screen. imo.
Kept em all busy so they could fix up the other 1.DevilWhoops
By:
wonby10
When: 05 Nov 13 09:17
Would have been a total mess had Tres Blue or Dunaden won, racing in this country would have become an instant joke, which connections of the second horse with $3m at stake wouldn't have fired in a protest against the winner. Bailey and stewards present surely wouldn't have been able to have heard the protest having been instrumental in the original decision. No payouts with a hearing when a panel of independent stewards could be formed with the possibility of it all ending up in the Supreme Court at some date in the future. Bailey really needs to take stock and stand down pending an inquiry into his actions. Credibility (if he had any) totally shot.
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 09:28
He lost all credibility when he stitched Nikolic up, now i'm no DN apologist, he deserved time but for what he did do wrong not a beat up by TB
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 09:31
I wonder did Michael Duffy back Fiorente today?
By:
uncleee
When: 05 Nov 13 09:36
doesnt say that permission cant be retroactive, dont know about the other horse but using white heeler is nothing - they were correct to leave it in the field
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 09:57
uncleee • November 5, 2013 9:36 AM GMT
doesnt say that permission cant be retroactive, dont know about the other horse but using white heeler is nothing - they were correct to leave it in the field

You're fkn joking surely? So you're saying you break the rules and then apply for permission? You been betting on the trots for too long Laugh
By:
Lloydy Trots Man
When: 05 Nov 13 09:57
Uncle,
Im still puzzled how Lance copped nothing when Smoken Up won Inter in NZ.
What happened about that?
Race taken off horse but nothing happened to Lance.
Has me baffled that one.
I wonder how good racing would be if you just let the best Chemist win
By:
uncleee
When: 05 Nov 13 10:52
if the stewards say that it is ok then they havent broken any rule, the rule says they may withdraw them, not they will or should... and some people are comparing this to happy trails, pahlease, one used a needle the other used a topical antiseptic

barry lew was caught treating on NZ cup day with syringe over the tongue, allowed to start - upstanding trainer and all that
lance lost the race but wasnt found to have been complicit with presenting him with dmso, so he wasnt actually charged with anything
By:
spyvspy27
When: 05 Nov 13 10:56
Didn't Happy Trails swab come up clean?
By:
Castiron
When: 05 Nov 13 11:18
They always do, Spy.
By:
Lets Elope
When: 05 Nov 13 11:21
yes it did and no syringe was ever found but of course beshara was lying according to the stewards. if that had gone to a court of law the stewards would have been laughed out of existence.
By:
PardonThePun
When: 05 Nov 13 11:23
White Healer lmao, that's on a par with oiling a horses feet - technically a treatment also, surely common sense should always prevail.
By:
uncleee
When: 05 Nov 13 11:36
common sense eh - in QLD your not allowed to use molasses in their water unless you buy it from the club
By:
PardonThePun
When: 05 Nov 13 11:45
Yes uncleee most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, that rule wont last long surely.
By:
Live_in_Hope
When: 05 Nov 13 23:37
a pack of dobbers these 'security guards' are turning out to be
By:
wombleoz
When: 06 Nov 13 00:59
it's a disgrace Wonby - one rule for the battler another for the big names AngryAngryAngry
By:
wombleoz
When: 06 Nov 13 01:00
agree re Oliver as well - leaves a bad taste in my mouth that he was able to negotiate a penalty that meant he didn't miss the carnival
By:
Neeson
When: 06 Nov 13 01:49
Now that RVL has increased the powers of it's Integrity Commission, should they re-open the Damian Oliver case, now that they have the power to compel people to appear and answer questions before the commission.
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 01:58
That sounds like double jeopardy Neeson
By:
Neeson
When: 06 Nov 13 02:25
He only admitted to one bet, and was suspended for one bet. Were there more?
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 02:30
Thats a fair point and answer to your question is, maybe/possibly/certainly Laugh But to investigate him further would make things very uncomfortable for 1 or more of the committeemen down there, so best to just move on in their opinion
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 06 Nov 13 02:54
Interesting ............ MUG Spy wants to say the trots are clearly the most corrupt code around LaughLaughLaugh

What a complete farce that all was, you would have to be a complete mug to think gallops is not the most corrupt code, where the most money exists that will always be the case
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:11
Thats why there are virtually no bookies left at the trots and corps tread very carefully with trot punters. AD should stand for Aussie Donkey and thats only if you're an Aussie Laugh
You haven't answered, are you a 2 or a 3? because by your own words you're not a 1 LaughLaughLaugh
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 06 Nov 13 03:19
What a mug .......... talk about bad timing for another gallops rort by the rule makers, after you had got on your soapbox just the night before carrying on about how much worse the trots are. You must have felt like a complete dill as that fiasco unfolded Laugh
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 06 Nov 13 03:21
By the way, can you try to refer to one of the issues at hand in your next post, through the whole discussion you have not referred to the issues at all, I wonder why Laugh
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:23
You total goose, where have I ever said there is no corruption at the gallops, but it has been able to sustain the corruption whereas the trots were corrupted into the ground into the said pathetic state the sport finds itself in now and if you don't think the sport is in a pathetic state, i feel sorry for you
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:24
Still waiting on your answer, are you a 2 or a 3?
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 06 Nov 13 03:30
Waiting for an answer on some stupid unrelated question, desperate to get off topic it seems.

You clearly didn't understand the market you were referring to the other night (because you don't know the horses at all) and were just guessing. The more you post you seem like you are no more than a guesser with an extremely limited knowledge of the sport generally. You certainly know nothing about markets, that was plain for all to see
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:39
You keep harping about my comment about that race, you say they were priced the wrong way around, but you said that after the race, not a peep out of you before it, so you aftertime to show your knowledge.

Yes I was guessing because of the reputation the trots have, it was off the cuff and had these LaughLaughLaugh after the comment. The drifter did gallop at the start, so I asked you if you knew the drifter was off, you not only said you didn't know, you also said you knew nothing for a fact, but you say you know markets, there is a contradiction in itself
By:
Aussie Driver
When: 06 Nov 13 03:44
Did you not aftertime posting your thoughts after the race? You are hilarious.

You didn't say it in that manner at all, not only a mug but a liar. You know exactly what you were saying and didn't like being told you were wrong by someone who knew the product in question more than you
By:
Live_in_Hope
When: 06 Nov 13 03:46
Laugh
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:49
I didn't know anything about the race beforehand, so thats a bit different, but you said you knew the market was wrong, but you didn't say that until after the race, that my dumb friend is aftertiming
By:
spyvspy27
When: 06 Nov 13 03:50
And I stick by by comment the trots are filthy with corruption
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com