Australian
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 132 comments are related to the topic:
R.Waterhouse
R.Waterhouse
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 132
|
By:
Enough for you to buy them spy and put them up here for all the desperates ?
|
|
By:
No, I can't afford the 55 bucks, but if people want to buy them, I say let them as they're all over 18 and hopefully of sound mind
|
|
By:
How much does the pension pay these days spy? i'm nearly there + i only bet in 50c units too so would have to back the card to break square
but the issue is the same, you can have a 1000/1 the sets would be 100% fair dinkum all the time |
|
By:
Depends if you're self funded or not, I am thats why I can't afford the 55
 |
|
By:
Mr Elephant,
As you said your maths is not the best........Return of 611 minus outlay of 440 = 171 units. Prices recorded at time of recieving message, with the exception of It's A Dundeel who I backed best tote, the fixed price was $1.3 when the email arrived. |
|
By:
TheElephant 03 Apr 13 02:15
How much does the pension pay these days spy? i'm nearly there + i only bet in 50c units too so would have to back the card to break square but the issue is the same, you can have a 1000/1 the sets would be 100% fair dinkum all the time Mr Elephant, maybe you should ask Mr Carnegie his opinion on whether the sets are fair dinkum as he obviously subscribes. Mr Carnegie there is a mistake in your math as well, Unpretentious was scratched yet you have it as minus 5 units, so your win is even better than you claim |
|
By:
Spy,
Right you are Unpretentious was scr'd at the barrier and I neglected to take it out, not a math error but my mistake all the same. Yes I'm comfortable with the integrity of RW's sets - they were of much more use to me when they sent them out in full in the morning, since the change some of the bets have become problematic but that's an issue for me, it may or may not bother others. The problem with them coming through at the 10 minute in a way confirms the integrity of them, in that Rob's team has started backing the selections on course proir to the email going out and the price is gone by the time the email arrives. Julienas last week is a good example, it "top fluc'd" $3.4 but was $3 when the email arrived....... |
|
By:
count it again wombat the outlay was 490 units minus the 5
i suppose you subscribe to all the other crap on the show too? believe in the easter bunny as well ? |
|
By:
Thats only a moot point Mr L R Fent, and If Mr Carnegie is happy subscribing, it shouldn't upset you.
|
|
By:
Thanks for pointing out the error of my ways Mr Elephant, right you are there were 2 cells not being picked up in the total (2x25 units) so there you go, my mistake......
In regard to easter bunnies & wombats, if it makes you feel better to get that off your chest, I'm happy for you! Mr Spy, you're right I am comfortable paying for information that is useful to me. I prefer to add and contrast it to my own work and that works for me but each to their own............ |
|
By:
anyone going to put up the set from Saturday? CarnegieH?
|
|
By:
Tipped the program I heard Mr Elephant
|
|
By:
oh man of the match the other bloke tips 4 in every race and gets 1 20/1 winner every 6 months he hasn't got much to beat
|
|
By:
Must be going better than racenet MYM as I think they pulled the pin on it
|
|
By:
gotta love journalists who charge for tips, nearly as bad as bookmakers
|
|
By:
I'd be happy to put up a set, if that's what the public want? CrowFormGold
|
|
By:
would make the Layers happy crow
 |
|
By:
go for it crowballs everyone else is, even bookmakers! for the believers they are the blokes who take your bets, whose son would you believe also happens to be a bookmaker!, and they want to tell you who to put your money on and even how much to put on!!!!!!
and people actually pay them for this???? FOR FK SAKE |
|
By:
I'll pm them and LIH is blocked, same smart ass attitude as da judge
|
|
By:
And to show you how hurt I was I posted it twice ffs
|
|
By:
come on put them up someone, did he tip people in to MJ ?
|
|
By:
Would be interested in Mr Carnegie putting up RWs set from Saturday
|
|
By:
The rat inspector?
|
|
By:
Nothing from the believers ?
|
|
By:
According to Dallas Baker, Robby tipped MJ on top.
|
|
By:
ouch
robbie tipping it ... and ... an assertion as yet still anecdotal & unproven ... that TW bagged it ... isn't sydney racing an interesting place |
|
By:
Sickening
No better than that goose with the fitness % fairy tales Rorting the delusional |
|
By:
Is Mr Murrihy going to ask RW (the bloke who sleeps with the trainer of More Joyous, who treated the sick horse with antibiotics) why he told people to back More Joyous on his paid tipping service???????????????????????????????
|
|
By:
Very good point Elephant.
|
|
By:
Simple answer to that Mr Elephant, Gai never mentioned it, and Gai will confirm it by saying she never mentioned it to anyone as in her opinion it was insignificant. RWs book will show he backed MJ for a good result.
What would be interesting to know is, at what stage of the betting did RW & TW money go on? Not that i'm alluding to anything untoward, but would be interesting if it went on after Singo blew up. |
|
By:
About 3 minutes after Gai rang Tommy.
|
|
By:
3 minutes? try .3 of a second, just joking, Gai was too busy to ring anyone pre race, after the race she probably rang Tommy to find out what all the kerfuffle was about.
|
|
By:
Well they may not have many witness's, but they do have phone records.
Had to when i saw Ray's investigators as "a CRACK team". |
|
By:
^^ described in the paper ^^
|
|
By:
Some might say a team with cracks
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I wonder if certain witness's in the case were Encouraged or Advised that they would
be better off not showing up? Of course, that wouldn't happen would it? Probably just my cynical mind. |
|
By:
Johns & Robbo are between the biggest rock and hardest place they could be, not for reporting to Singo, but because its against the Waterhouses
|
|
By:
Eddie might get the title on his house back if he keeps his mouth shut.
|
|
By:
The phone records, they're only what time calls were made, not conversations had, is that correct?
|