20:00:14 : Matthew: Please wait one moment whilst I review your enquiry.
20:05:00 : Matthew: Unfortunately your account has been excluded from placing bet on harness racing.
20:05:40 : z533373: What do you mean "Unfortunately your account has been excluded from placing bet on harness racing"?
20:06:22 : z533373: Is that code for "We're now run by a bunch of weak Irish pricks who have no spine, are not real bookmakers and do not accept anyone who regularly wins at a certain code"???
Ballsy, your bets were too spread out with 5 bets over 3 seperate days. As such you must know what you are doing. They only want punters that know nothing & will bet on every race until they lose.
Ballsy, your bets were too spread out with 5 bets over 3 seperate days. As such you must know what you are doing. They only want punters that know nothing & will bet on every race until they lose.
Thank you for your email to Nick. He is currently out of the office and has asked me to respond on his behalf.
Nick shares your concerns on this issue and will be very happy to follow this up further at a Federal level.
He is very concerned about the practices you mentioned and those raised by others who have been in contact with us and is looking into ways to improve the legislative arrangements regarding sportsbetting.
Thank you for taking the time to write to Nick on this issue.
Kind regards, Danielle
Danielle Forsyth | Correspondence Officer | Office of Nick Xenophon, Independent Senator for South Australia Lvl 2/31 Ebenezer Place, Adelaide | TEL: 08 8232 1144 | F: 08 8232 3744 | www.nickxenophon.com.au
The information contained within this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, access to it is unauthorised and any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Dear Sir, Thank you for your email to Nick. He is currently out of the office and has asked me to respond on his behalf. Nick shares your concerns on this issue and will be very happy to follow this up further at a Federal level. He is very concerned
You may be right Joel, that may be his preferred scenario, or perhaps the man has just never been given all sides of the picture. Zero chance that net / sports betting will ever be banned in this country - even if he wanted it to....imo.
You may be right Joel, that may be his preferred scenario, or perhaps the man has just never been given all sides of the picture. Zero chance that net / sports betting will ever be banned in this country - even if he wanted it to....imo.
And yeah Khan good point, I should have signed off with "I won't be holding my breath waiting for a follow up response once NZ raises this at a specially convened Senate committee"! I feel better now though
And yeah Khan good point, I should have signed off with "I won't be holding my breath waiting for a follow up response once NZ raises this at a specially convened Senate committee"! I feel better now though
Just had IAS' parent company Sportsbet knock back a 100 bet from me on a 11.00 shot footy bet, drop the price to 9.50 and offer me 9.00. IAS went from 11 to 9.5 at the same time. They can't even take a 1k exposure bet now? WTF is the point?
Just had IAS' parent company Sportsbet knock back a 100 bet from me on a 11.00 shot footy bet, drop the price to 9.50 and offer me 9.00. IAS went from 11 to 9.5 at the same time.They can't even take a 1k exposure bet now? WTF is the point?
punters club is pushing Sportsbetting . com . au - has anyone signed up yet? they reckon they'll bet you to the limits on track - not sure about sports limits though
they need to be shut downpunters club is pushing Sportsbetting . com . au - has anyone signed up yet? they reckon they'll bet you to the limits on track - not sure about sports limits though
I have seen less interesting stories on shows like ACA or Today Tonight or similar. I am sure punters able to bet with these corps may have some sort of an opinion on knowing the truth about the reported bets, and the fact that they weed out all punters to the biggest losers they can. The whole process is discriminatory, and goes completely against the problem gambling rubbish that they promote on their site. That is who they are targetting, and only them. Offering credit to losing punters, and not touching anybody with a shred of intelligence.
We have to hear all the bullshit about problem gamblers and the problem it is to society, but the reality is the ratio will only go up, because these will soon be the only people allowed to bet anywhere. Tatts even knocking back cash bettors in their outlets it seems. A new T+C on the website all about their ability to restrict your turnover based on how much you win.
Get it out there that not all gamblers are degenerates with their children going hungry and their wives having to turn to prostitution to cover the debts created.
Get together as a group, from people barred who turnover 50 bucks a week, to those that turned over thousands. Punters barred from 1 winning bet to the highrollers.
It is a good story to show a hugely succesful punter getting barred from betting with a company, but it is a great story to show that EVERY succesful punter no matter how small the profit will be banned for having an account in profit.
Organise it, hit it hard. Any half assed sob story of a guy that had his account closed. But somebody with a list of thousands of names of people that have had their accounts closed will show the reality of the situation. ACA or Today Tonight would be my suggestion, of course if done right.
I have seen less interesting stories on shows like ACA or Today Tonight or similar. I am sure punters able to bet with these corps may have some sort of an opinion on knowing the truth about the reported bets, and the fact that they weed out all pun
That 10/1 shot hit (was St Kilda to lead, Port to win HT/FT double). Looks like they saved themselves some money
I had to take 9.25/1 on Bettie. Now I hate them even more.
That 10/1 shot hit (was St Kilda to lead, Port to win HT/FT double). Looks like they saved themselves some money I had to take 9.25/1 on Bettie. Now I hate them even more.
Selection Selection Details Result 1 Australian Rules AFL Port Adelaide v St Kilda 01/04/2012 16:40 Halftime/Fulltime Double St Kilda/Port Adelaide @ 11.00 (Win)
Win Stake and Return Details
Bet Placed on27/03/2012 Bet TypeSingle Number of lines1 Stake per line$454.54 ChannelSB Internet Total stake$454.54 Free bets redeemed$0.00 Total amount paid$4999.94 Returns$4999.9
Suffer Sportsbet!!!
Ok I lied. I got on Selection Selection Details Result1 Australian RulesAFL Port Adelaide v St Kilda01/04/2012 16:40 Halftime/Fulltime DoubleSt Kilda/Port Adelaide @ 11.00 (Win) WinStake and Return DetailsBet Placed on27/03/2012Bet TypeSing
The $100 was a further $100. I had already bet. When I asked for another $100 they knocked me backed. I know I bent the truth a little. Don't let the truth get in the way of good story
The $100 was a further $100. I had already bet. When I asked for another $100 they knocked me backed.I know I bent the truth a little. Don't let the truth get in the way of good story
If you are implying that I think I'm simply the best, that isn't the purpose of that post. We all hate them and I wanted to show that they can still be hit.
If you are implying that I think I'm simply the best, that isn't the purpose of that post. We all hate them and I wanted to show that they can still be hit.
Tis ok, Dos. I'll only post the losing bets from now on. In truth I posted that with a little bit of reluctance. I really don't need them knowing who I am.
Tis ok, Dos. I'll only post the losing bets from now on. In truth I posted that with a little bit of reluctance. I really don't need them knowing who I am.
I am not Crazy Snake on their books. I am something entirely different. Look, the point is they WILL take a bet, but only on things they want to lay heavily. They allow me to continue because I hit the things they want to lay. I am not trying to big-note here. Just trying to make the point that they will not lay you unless it's on their terms. In other words, if your betting patterns suggest you are a numpty, even if you are in profit overall, they will allow you to continue, as I have with them since 2002.
I am not Crazy Snake on their books. I am something entirely different.Look, the point is they WILL take a bet, but only on things they want to lay heavily. They allow me to continue because I hit the things they want to lay. I am not trying to big-n
We're good, Dos. Some people might have thought that was my intent, but it really isn't. Was kinda hoping people would go "woot!!! somebody got those bastards"
We're good, Dos. Some people might have thought that was my intent, but it really isn't.Was kinda hoping people would go "woot!!! somebody got those bastards"
We knew Sportsbet were a bunch of scumbag Irish sharks, but this one takes the cake.
West Coast Eagles price against GWS = 1.0
They take bets allowing the punter to risk for 0 gain. That should be illegal IMHO. But regardless, that is the most cynical thing I have ever seen from a bookmaker.
We knew Sportsbet were a bunch of scumbag Irish sharks, but this one takes the cake.West Coast Eagles price against GWS = 1.0They take bets allowing the punter to risk for 0 gain. That should be illegal IMHO. But regardless, that is the most cynical
That, at least has a skeric of integrity about it. But to offer a market you know achieves nothing while taking all profit on the opposing option is just pathetic. Ever since Matt Tripp offloaded to the Irish it's been appalling. I would boycott them, but every now and again I hit 'em and it gives me pleasure to hurt their pockets.
That, at least has a skeric of integrity about it. But to offer a market you know achieves nothing while taking all profit on the opposing option is just pathetic. Ever since Matt Tripp offloaded to the Irish it's been appalling. I would boycott them
NRL Footy show last night Centrebet offered a "special" price of $21 on Bryce Gibbs scoring a try....Maximum bet of a whopping $20. This is a bloke who hasn't scored a try since 2005. WTF has happened to bookmaking in this country?
NRL Footy show last night Centrebet offered a "special" price of $21 on Bryce Gibbs scoring a try....Maximum bet of a whopping $20.This is a bloke who hasn't scored a try since 2005.WTF has happened to bookmaking in this country?
Whoopi - I saw that, he said he hasn't scored a try for 120 weeks, should be 120/1
Saw the other "special offer" $11 about Marshall / Ryan scoring a try against the Eels and thought it was pretty good until I saw it was Marshall AND Ryan
Barney Whoopi - I saw that, he said he hasn't scored a try for 120 weeks, should be 120/1Saw the other "special offer" $11 about Marshall / Ryan scoring a try against the Eels and thought it was pretty good until I saw it was Marshall AND Ryan
Apparantly they are pretty weak taking bets on sports now too, or so the guy on the phone told me when he said no more bets for you.... Hmmmm Won't take my racing bets, greyhound, harness, or sports. What else do they offer for me? Waste of space.
Apparantly they are pretty weak taking bets on sports now too, or so the guy on the phone told me when he said no more bets for you.... Hmmmm Won't take my racing bets, greyhound, harness, or sports. What else do they offer for me? Waste of spac
I know a bloke who couln't bet on the Melbourne cup with Sportsbet in MAY
He couldn't bet in the top 10 at the Golf.
they just wouldn't bet him on anything.
They must have thought he was freaking genius, with a finger and an advantage in every pie.
PRETENDERS THE LOT OF THEM
I know a bloke who couln't bet on the Melbourne cup with Sportsbet in MAYHe couldn't bet in the top 10 at the Golf.they just wouldn't bet him on anything.They must have thought he was freaking genius, with a finger and an advantage in every pie.PRETE
Cadissa...You,re right about the English betting shops.I went to Betfred and was losing 60 pound in 3 bets and decided to have 80 pound on an 1/1 greyhound.They refused the bet as it was too big.I was then hopeing the dog was knocked over,which it was,and went to the window and gave the operator a blast which would have won an Academy Award.
My mate is winning plenty on English races and wanted 100 pound on a horse and was bet just over 3 pound.
I don,t bet with any Aussie corporates who wont take a decent bet.Closed 3 accounts last week.
Cadissa...You,re right about the English betting shops.I went to Betfred and was losing 60 pound in 3 bets and decided to have 80 pound on an 1/1 greyhound.They refused the bet as it was too big.I was then hopeing the dog was knocked over,which it wa
yes was but others involved there now - they are friends of mine and will bet - very opinionated, I'm not pitching them up - but they do bet pretty strong - but i don't know what ur main go is .
I would be interested to see if u can get set?
all the best
yes was but others involved there now - they are friends of mine and will bet - very opinionated, I'm not pitching them up - but they do bet pretty strong - but i don't know what ur main go is .I would be interested to see if u can get set?all the be
ok, Dos, on your say so I will watch their prices carefully this week and see how they track. If I see anything of interest I'll open up an account with them.
Cheers CS
ok, Dos, on your say so I will watch their prices carefully this week and see how they track. If I see anything of interest I'll open up an account with them.CheersCS
i will back up des dos at flemington sports bett ..champion bloke mick syl.... and late mail top sport very good as well bet.. with llyod for near 20 yrs well before he got licence at tweed found.. bookmakers dot com au... good as well ...
i will back up des dos at flemington sports bett ..champion bloke mick syl....and late mail top sport very good as well bet.. with llyod for near 20 yrs well before he got licence at tweed found.. bookmakers dot com au... good as well ...
Betchoice now clossing accounts. Received an email today.
'Unfortunately we have had to close your account. Please do not take it personally, as it is simply a commercial decision. We were proud of the fact that Betchoice was one of the few bookmakers that did not close winning accounts, but due to the win by Racing NSW in the High Court we must now move to a low volume/high margin model, and hence keeping winning accounts open is no longer an option for us. The balance of your outstanding funds has been sent back to you.
Apologies for having to do this to you and thankyou for your prior business.
Regards,
Mark
Mark Morrissey | Executive Director'
Very civil email, but it is about time the NT goverment had a review of the rules concerning corporate bookmakers.
Betchoice now clossing accounts.Received an email today.'Unfortunately we have had to close your account. Please do not take it personally, as it is simply a commercial decision. We were proud of the fact that Betchoice was one of the few bookmakers
i also got one of these EMAIL CLOSING MY ACCOUNT at approx 5.42 fri evening exactly the same wording......HENCE KEEPING WINNING ACCOUNTS OPEN IS NO LONER AN OPTION FOR US... overseas operators are buying up all the betting shops and STRICTLY only want losing customers if you break sq for the year no good to them LOSERS WELCOME ONLY.....
i also got one of these EMAIL CLOSING MY ACCOUNT at approx 5.42 fri eveningexactly the same wording......HENCE KEEPING WINNING ACCOUNTS OPEN IS NO LONER AN OPTION FOR US... overseas operators are buying up all the betting shops and STRICTLY only
and yes dos dedos COLIN TIDY great man had the account for 7yrs and MARK READ [IAS] was a champ as well both gentleman were GAMBLERS /TRADERS with strong opinion and barred nobody...
and yes dos dedos COLIN TIDY great man had the account for 7yrsand MARK READ [IAS] was a champ as well both gentleman were GAMBLERS /TRADERS with strong opinion and barred nobody...
It's a fking joke that they're able to do this, all the while having their "Problem Gambling" and "Gamblers Help" icons at the bottom of their pages. Disgusting.
I've stopped betting on the Qld harness as not enough liquidity here and can't get on anywhere bar tote any more and just take my own price there.
Using pinnaclesports.com for sports betting now. Way better lines, will let you on for as much as you like and winners are welcome. I know the bloke that runs their Australian operation - good fella and not afraid to take a bet, not like these English squibs.
It's a fking joke that they're able to do this, all the while having their "Problem Gambling" and "Gamblers Help" icons at the bottom of their pages. Disgusting.I've stopped betting on the Qld harness as not enough liquidity here and can't get on any
If you're a genuine consistent winner then why wouldn't they love to have your bets?
I've known guys who worked for a corp who took bets and back them big time elsewhere. Why tell these sources of great information to go somewhere else?
If you're a genuine consistent winner then why wouldn't they love to have your bets?I've known guys who worked for a corp who took bets and back them big time elsewhere. Why tell these sources of great information to go somewhere else?
Betchoice were recently bought by a UK firm as the above link shows. This would be the main reason for account closures as they are following the UK approach. The High Court decision would be a factor too but it is a convenient excuse
I can understand why the UK bookies like to close down winners and even small losers as they do. But I cannot understand why the Aussie racing authorities let them do it. It is not in the interest of Aussie racing to have punters barred from betting and it would be better for Aussie racing down the track if the bookies they have to deal with are not just a couple of mega firms like they have in the UK. Dealing with smaller, less rich and powerful bookies will be easier than dealing with billion dollar companies who then pay racing a pittance as happens in the UK
Bookies having to bet all customers to a certain amount like on track bookies in Australia should be a condition of betting on the races in Australia
http://www.ecommercereport.com.au/unibet-pays-aud20million-to-buy-australian-corporate-bookmaker-betchoice/Betchoice were recently bought by a UK firm as the above link shows. This would be the main reason for account closures as they are following
I'm getting really scared. My livelihood depends upon a balance of Betfair and bookmakers and they are dropping like flies. I don't bet horses or I think it would be all over for me and I'd have to get a real job. Betting sports keeps me going for the time being since they don't seem too perturbed by my activities to date. Why are the bookies selling up en masse? Are they being made offers too good to refuse? Seems way off base to me. Why buy up betting agencies and then kill off the turnover? I liked Manikato's post. I think you hit it on the head. Only trouble with the theory is that people always find money to gamble with. Will probably add weight to Xenophon's argument because there won't be any winners and the losers will all be broke and destitute.
I'm getting really scared. My livelihood depends upon a balance of Betfair and bookmakers and they are dropping like flies. I don't bet horses or I think it would be all over for me and I'd have to get a real job. Betting sports keeps me going for th
Funny thing just happened at Sportsbet. Don't know if they'll honour the bet or not and I was so surprised I only had $50 on it.
They put up Western Bulldogs 1.13 v Collingwood 6.00
I had 50 on the Pies and they pulled the market 10 seconds later. It's still showing in my account as a bet so I guess they're going to honour it. Haven't stopped laughing for 10 minutes.
Funny thing just happened at Sportsbet. Don't know if they'll honour the bet or not and I was so surprised I only had $50 on it.They put up Western Bulldogs 1.13 v Collingwood 6.00I had 50 on the Pies and they pulled the market 10 seconds later. It's
At least they had the decency to send me an email:
We are writing to you in regards to a recent bet you have placed on your Sportsbet account.
This correspondence serves as notification that your bet on the AFL gaem, Collingwood v Western Bulldogs has been cancelled due to the wrong lines/odds posted.
Your bet was cancelled due to the following Sportsbet Rules:
29. Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in these Terms and Conditions, if Sportsbet publishes, posts or quotes any incorrect betting information for any sporting event, such as posting wrong dividends or lines, then regardless of the cause or source of such error: 29.1 If an error is identified before, during or after an event, the Member whose bet on that event has been accepted or confirmed by Sportsbet, the bet/s may be void and the Member will be notified. 29.2 If Sportsbet can demonstrate that the error was manifest or obvious, or that the Member otherwise should reasonably have been aware of the error when the bet was placed, all bets shall be void.
At least they had the decency to send me an email:We are writing to you in regards to a recent bet you have placed on your Sportsbet account.This correspondence serves as notification that your bet on the AFL gaem, Collingwood v Western Bulldogs has
u didnt really think at any stage they would possiblely honour it did u?........they are a pack of fleas but that error was as plain as the nose on your face
u didnt really think at any stage they would possiblely honour it did u?........they are a pack of fleas but that error was as plain as the nose on your face
Interesting under those conditions technically they could in hindsight claim that the 4bucks Swan or whaterver they bet yesterday was the wrong price and void all winning bets not saying it will but technically it could, what happens if a really big punter decided liked I did that Swans are close to close to good things and wanted unloaded several hundred thousand or more on them are they then not going to pay out because in hindisght it was an obvious error, sorry we just realised the match was in reality a 50/50 game and the correct price should have been 1.90, technically under those rules it could happen.
Interesting under those conditions technically they could in hindsight claim that the 4bucks Swan or whaterver they bet yesterday was the wrong price and void all winning bets not saying it will but technically it could, what happens if a really big
It's a fair point, gardenstar. They would, of course honour THAT bet. I never had any respect for them to lose, so nothing lost in this case.
No, Loggy, I didnt think they'd honour it but it took them quite a long time to cancel it. I was hoping against hope.
The clause sure does excuse them, but they wouldn't take bigger bets these days in any case. All I can say is, chuck those Irish scum out and bring back Matt Tripp.
It's a fair point, gardenstar. They would, of course honour THAT bet. I never had any respect for them to lose, so nothing lost in this case.No, Loggy, I didnt think they'd honour it but it took them quite a long time to cancel it. I was hoping again
could they technically do what I suggested? I still haven't received an answer from any of you in this regard, I know it would be a crazy move but if you take those rules at face value it appears to me as though technically it is possible, which I find outrageous that they're able to operate under those conditions. And in a first I agree with gardenstar hard to see them cancelling your bet if you accidentally backed the dogs at the wrong price, you can guarantee the TAB wouldn't.
could they technically do what I suggested? I still haven't received an answer from any of you in this regard, I know it would be a crazy move but if you take those rules at face value it appears to me as though technically it is possible, which I fi
Ah for the old simpler days when all you needed for a valid contract was offer, acceptance and consideration. Agree with sentiments above, a bunch of grubs.
Ah for the old simpler days when all you needed for a valid contract was offer, acceptance and consideration. Agree with sentiments above, a bunch of grubs.
hawks were short priced favourites lIH they would have got plenty out of them they can't turn around and say sorry we bet the wrong price its actually a 50/50 game you can have 1.90 if you like about a $4 shot.
hawks were short priced favourites lIH they would have got plenty out of them they can't turn around and say sorry we bet the wrong price its actually a 50/50 game you can have 1.90 if you like about a $4 shot.
I didn't even know all this BS was going on, selling books to the Poms and Irish who are complete ****s at letting you actually get a bet on, you only need to visit the main racing forum to see the whinging and whining about closed accounts and tiny bet sizes.
They should all be named and shamed publicly and Aussies should boycott using them, sounds like Tom Waterhouse may get some new business.
I pretty much gave betting up several years ago apart from some big horse races, the writing was on the wall back a few years i think.
Imagine if Kerry Packer was still alive,
KP "id like to place 100 on the favourite please",
Bookie "im sorry sir we wont accept 100, you can have 10 though"
KP "are you serious, i can only bet 10 grand on the favourite?"
Bookie, "umm, no i mean 10 dollars not 10 grand"
KP " expletive expletive expletive"
End call.
I didn't even know all this BS was going on, selling books to the Poms and Irish who are complete ****s at letting you actually get a bet on, you only need to visit the main racing forum to see the whinging and whining about closed accounts and tiny
terrific article womble cheers ... well worth a 2nd read ... on how they conduct busniess & identify/flag smart players
i was curious as to a "Govt Definition" or "Commission Definition" of 'problem gambling'
... wiki had something naturally
Most other definitions of problem gambling can usually be simplified to any gambling that causes harm to the gambler or someone else in any way.
However, these definitions are usually coupled with descriptions of the type of harm or the use of diagnostic criteria.
According to DSM-IV, Pathological gambling is now defined as separate from a manic episode. Only when the gambling occurs independent of other impulsive, mood, or thought disorders is it considered its own diagnosis. In order to be diagnosed, an individual must have at least five of the following symptoms:
1.Preoccupation. The subject has frequent thoughts about gambling experiences, whether past, future, or fantasy.
2.Tolerance. As with drug tolerance, the subject requires larger or more frequent wagers to experience the same "rush".
3.Withdrawal. Restlessness or irritability associated with attempts to cease or reduce gambling.
4.Escape. The subject gambles to improve mood or escape problems.
5.Chasing. The subject tries to win back gambling losses with more gambling.
6.Lying. The subject tries to hide the extent of his or her gambling by lying to family, friends, or therapists.
7.Loss of control. The person has unsuccessfully attempted to reduce gambling.
8.Illegal acts. The person has broken the law in order to obtain gambling money or recover gambling losses. This may include acts of theft, embezzlement, fraud, or forgery.
9.Risked significant relationship. The person gambles despite risking or losing a relationship, job, or other significant opportunity.
10.Bailout. The person turns to family, friends, or another third party for financial assistance as a result of gambling.
As with many disorders, the DSM-IV definition of pathological gambling is widely accepted and used as a basis for research and clinical practice internationally.
terrific article womble cheers ... well worth a 2nd read ... on how they conduct busniess & identify/flag smart playersi was curious as to a "Govt Definition" or "Commission Definition" of 'problem gambling' ... wiki had something naturallyMost other
Once Sportsbet paid me 10k instead of 1k. They only realised about 12 hours later and promptly removed it from the account.
They also love restricting to $50 bets, then $10 bets and $1 bets to total restriction.
The only way you can beat them is become really good at tipping for their free prizes. Only extreme losers are welcome!
Once Sportsbet paid me 10k instead of 1k. They only realised about 12 hours later and promptly removed it from the account.They also love restricting to $50 bets, then $10 bets and $1 bets to total restriction.The only way you can beat them is become
Where head to head prices are subject to change, significant movement in the line is used as a method of determining the legality or otherwise of said bet. I remember a few years ago where the Hawks went from $3.00 to 1.50 on the back of the Saints resting many of their stars for a game in Tassie late in the season with nothing to play for. In that case, Sportsbet could conceivably have cancelled bets made prior to the news on the basis that the REAL price should have been opposite (the inverse of 3.00 is 1.50). This only happened one time that I can remember, but it does beg the question "what if they had chosen to envoke the 'wrong price' clause in that situation?" Would an independent arbiter have been able to prevent them...
Scary stuff for pro gamblers to contemplate, especially if you attempt to arbitrage at a later stage.
Ok LE, to address your question/comment:Where head to head prices are subject to change, significant movement in the line is used as a method of determining the legality or otherwise of said bet.I remember a few years ago where the Hawks went from $3
While a game is under way, the team will often create special, one-off bets triggered by events, or even talking points raised by the commentators. If Rooney is on a yellow card, they might put the odds up for him to be sent off. Graham Sharpe personally handles some of the stranger requests that come into William Hill. ‘When a cat ran on to the pitch at Anfield we opened a new market on what would be the next animal to run on and sure enough, a few Saturdays later at QPR a squirrel came on, so we paid out. 'When we reopened the book the other day somebody bet on a unicorn, which we offered at 1,000 to 1. ‘I wouldn’t be at all surprised if we see a bloke in a unicorn outfit turning up on the pitch tonight.’
Oh God, I have tears
While a game is under way, the team will often create special, one-off bets triggered by events, or even talking points raised by the commentators.If Rooney is on a yellow card, they might put the odds up for him to be sent off. Graham Sharpe persona
Bets now limited to $500 payout. Well that's the end of that. I have plenty of mates who like $500 bets . They will be chasing me for years trying to stop me. I was told by one of said mates that I should report this to the AW rumour file and name and shame them. Anyone know if this is worthwhile? I am now invested in launching a campaign against their shoddy activities here.
Bets now limited to $500 payout. Well that's the end of that. I have plenty of mates who like $500 bets .They will be chasing me for years trying to stop me.I was told by one of said mates that I should report this to the AW rumour file and name and
They seem ok, Dos. Their head to head prices are competitive, but their exotic stuff doesnt come out til late. The thing I like about Sportsbet is they put prices up early and they bet all kinds of exotics in the run. Nobody else does that.
I like to set up early and follow (or create) movement to maximise profitability. It's hard to do that when they don't put stuff up 'til Thursday. I can use them when the cashflow improves though. It's improving week to week so I should be able to throw stuff their way soonish.
I need to find a bookmaker who offers HT/FT doubles on fave/dog that's competitive. That is my fave bet type and Sportsbet do that better than anyone else.
They seem ok, Dos. Their head to head prices are competitive, but their exotic stuff doesnt come out til late. The thing I like about Sportsbet is they put prices up early and they bet all kinds of exotics in the run. Nobody else does that.I like to
Betsquesy - the latest weak bookie to ban punters. "Your style of betting (winning presumably) does not suit our business. If you were a genuine punter (code for loser?) we might be more inclined to bet you". Never had a fixed price bet only used their tote product.
Betsquesy - the latest weak bookie to ban punters. "Your style of betting (winning presumably) does not suit our business. If you were a genuine punter (code for loser?) we might be more inclined to bet you". Never had a fixed price bet only used the
Was doing my budgets this morning and found an anomoly with the Sportingbet prices, so I had $100 at 4.75 on something that should have been 2.20. Then I thought about it because Sportsbet cancelled an obvious wrong price from last week, so I rang them (Sportingbet) and told them what the problem was and they let me keep the bet at the higher price. Finally, a bookmaker with some integrity...
Was doing my budgets this morning and found an anomoly with the Sportingbet prices, so I had $100 at 4.75 on something that should have been 2.20. Then I thought about it because Sportsbet cancelled an obvious wrong price from last week, so I rang th