By:
Worth pointing out that State of Play ticks every box bar the season runs
Since this has been the plan since last year's race rather than resulting from an interrupted preparation if you have any confidence in the trainer this former hennessey winner and gold cup ante post favourite must look a decent stats pick at 25/1 off 10-6 (142) His record over fences after a 3 month+ is: Won Novice Chase Won 30K handicap at national meeting by 16L Won Hennessey off 145 6th in Gold Cup (11.5L behind peak from Kauto) 2nd in Charlie Hall Won Charlie Hall 4th in National off 150 Unplaced in Hennessey 3rd in National off 145 |
By:
the demps i know sop runs well fresh, but i dont think this race can be won by a first time out runner.
great place bet tho,would be great feet if he wins |
By:
nice stats bigben,are there any horses what meet the stats, but have left out of your shortlist
|
By:
you missed one off the shortlist ...
|
By:
Nice Stats,but wasn't Montys Pass 128 or 129 official rating when the weights came out?.Anybody know what the old stopwatch ratings [years ago in the Update]are now called ?they used to be amazing for this race !!!
|
By:
pipe...no idea what the OR was for Montys Pass was when the weights came out, but if it's any help he was orginally alloted 10-5, and his Postmark was 175.
|
By:
i think montys pass OR was 137..
a lot of previous winners would not get in the race now with there ratings |
By:
I think he was 139 when he won jasey, but happy to be corrected on that, all I know is that the OR for the top weight when the weights came out was 160.
|
By:
Whats the stats for a horse once running over 5f turning into the 4mile 4f staying champion of the world?
|
By:
No idea if it happened more than once Mooono?
|
By:
I would say the stats are firmly against a horse once running over 5f..Im not clued up when it comes to stats but i highly doubt its ever happend before..But this year i think Majestic Concorde has a great chance..Hes my main hope of the outsiders ive picked..
|
By:
Montys Pass ran off 139.
|
By:
Mooono, Red Rum's first race was over 5f!
|
By:
^ Think he's attempting to yank people's chains
|
By:
Yes I was caught out in a quizz. Question was did Lester Piggot ever ride Red Rum said no but of course he did. Started over 5 furlongs strange as it may seem.
|
By:
It is a great coincidence that the first race that Red Rum raced in, was at, what was to become his favourite course, Liverpool. On this first occasion he dead headed with Curlicue for first place. This was the companion horse that he was with at the sales! . This was a two year old's selling race run at a distance of 5 furlongs.
In total Red Rum ran at Liverpool seven times, he won four and came second in the other three. In Red Rum's 10 year career he had twenty four different jockeys, Including Lester Piggott, he also had five trainers but in that career he managed to win 3 flat races, 3 hurdle races and also 21 Steeplechases. He was also placed 37 times so he must have taken all the changes in his stride. His obvious love of racing held him in good stead and it is worth saying that he never actually fell in a race although he once unseated his rider and once slipped up (another coincidence was that both of these were at Haydock) . |
By:
another i shud have mentioned was northern alliance who is in the weights and trained by mr martin so commands respect
|
By:
Stats look good for Majestic now then get on them horses once running over 5f..Red Rums first ever race over 5f [smiley:crazy] You learn something knew everyday..
|
By:
Great post and very well researched ! It rules out quite a few but still a very open race again this year. Normally you can look at the national field and say half a dozen horses have an outstanding chance stats wise with another 4 or 5 that meet most of the criteria.
Having said that I could not have picked Don't Push It last year purely on the weight Statistic - which in the last 20 or so nationals has been the overriding statistic. But with Hedgehunter and Mon Mome both carrying 11st or more in recent years maybe weight is not so telling a factor. Interesting that both of these horses went on to finish in the frame in the following seasons Gold Cup. I have backed a few as always - Big Fella Thanks in the hope that Ferdy might have discovered a way of getting him to stay the last 3 or 4 furlongs better than Paul Nichols (doubtful though - but the horse has done me a couple of favours and would hate to see him win and not be on). Niche Market - I fancied him last year and like the Irish National statistic. Bluesea Cracker - again for the Irish National factor and backed her before JPM purchased her. Chief Dan George - has won at Aintree over hurdles and seems a spring horse, and after his fall at Cheltenham this year seems somewhat overlooked. Good price on Betfair too. Have also got some silly prices about King Fontaine who although has yet to prove he stays a trip I was taken by his run at Cheltenham and is still improving. Also got some silly prices about Comply or Die - who won't know himself with such a light weight on his back. I have watched last years race a few times recently and he ran a cracker of a race under 11-5 until 3 out, after which Timmy let him come home in his own time. I think he has an outstanding chance again this year and can still be backed @95/1 on betfair. I have not backed him because the prices have gone - but I also like Ballabriggs profile this year. - so may yet have a saver |
By:
I strongly feel the weights stat is now a thing of the past. Last year the first 2 home (and well clear of the 3rd) carried upwards of 11st 5lb. The year before when Mon Mome won the race, the first 4 home carried upwards of 11st. The compression of the weights is making it much easier for the `higher ability` horses to stamp their authority on the race. What A Friend for example only has to give Ballabriggs 6lb, and on good ground would canter all over Ballabriggs over 3.5 miles but of course the rest is a guessing game. Ballabriggs will jump for fun and this will help bridge the `form` gap though, What A Friend is the pure form horse. Excellent write up.
|
By:
Blimey bigbentthehorseman, That's an impressive analysis. Much better than my pin system. One horse that sticks out for me is Putney Bridge. I used to live right beside Putney Bridge and it was quite popular for throwing yourself off if things weren't going very well. No doubt lots of people in Fulham and Putney will be backing it, so lets hope it wins.
|
By:
Angel Gabriel mentioned "bridge" in his expert analysis, so perhaps this could be an omen for the race, especially with Micahel Jackson just down the road from Putney Bridge.
|
By:
Might be hard to beat it.
|
By:
Papillon was 139,def!!!,tho 129 doesnt get you a run these days,i'll check out the result,i seem to have mislaid the original weights that year,pretty sure 129/128/tho.
|
By:
the weight stat still has to be taken seriously,but i prefer the official ratings band as an area to eliminate horses.
just because a horse is 11st as opposed to 10 13 dosent mean his chances have gone. im sure i have read a stat were they eliminate everthing 13 pounds above bottom weight |
By:
If that was the case Jasey, you would have put a line through Dont Push It and Black Apalachi last year.
|
By:
Bluesea Cracer
Chief Dan George West End Rocker Those are the three for me. |
By:
with that stat dont push it would have got in,but from a trends point you would not have backed him
|
By:
This race has changed so much in recent years, so much so that using stats from 10 years ago is bonkers imho.
10 years ago almost every horse ran off its OR, now those at the head of the weights get in far more leniently thanks to Mr Smith's compression policy. I personally would only use stats from the point in time he was employed to frame the National weights. I'm not to sure when this was but I would guess around 5 years ago. The thing is when using stats is to recognise when they are evolving, things never stay the same forever. From now on weight will be a stat that I completely disregard for the race. |
By:
agree with you totally.new trends will come about in time. maybe in 10years time we will be crossing out all weighted below 11st
|
By:
I thought y'days blog in the Guardian was interesting...
Last 3 years the number of horses carrying 11st+ was 19, 16 and 18 The average of the three years before that (when the 11st stat seemed to work much better) was 9. Which is what it is this year too. It also looks like the weight range will almost be the max - even with no withdrawals bottom wt is 10-3. Wasnt there an arugment that the weight stat should be 'dont back horses carrying a stone more than the bottom weight' rather than 'dont back over 11st'? |
By:
Thats true Dog
Yet take last year for example Dont Push It and Black Apalachi both carried a stone or more than the bottom weight. They were also 20L clear of the 3rd. The higher ability horses now have the edge in a `handicap` sense. |
By:
This is always one of my favourite threads of the year. There always seems to be a difference of opinion as to which Stats/Trends have the greatest significance. It appears clear that over the last few years the "weight" stat is not as important as it once was.
From a personal point of view I always like it when the connections say that this race has been "the plan all season". To that end I have to agree with the conclusions of "bigben" and will be having my 50p Each-Way on Ballabriggs and Oscar Time. I may also have a combination forecast/tricast? on these two with The Midnight Club and Backstage. |
By:
dunno about State of Play ticking all the boxes
It's 11 years old and the way I would analyse the stats would be to reccommend laying every horse that is not 9 or 10 |
By:
^ i always think older horses ie 10/11 have a decent record if they are irish bred, frenchies have poor record overall,and the weight stat is becoming outdated, but thats due to the going being good, when we get a wet race then its time to look at the weight issue again
|
By:
Another interesting pointer is that since 1998 at least British horses (with the exception of Red Marauder in that dodgey race) had all produced or equalled their best RPR in the year of the race. The exceptions are the Irish trained horses Hedgehunter,Bobbyjo and Papillon who posted their best the previous year.
|
By:
Thanks very much for the analysis....am very grateful you took a lot of the work out of it for those of us who like stats, and nailed the winner. Excellent stuff and much appreciated.
|
By:
Good stuff. Doing the same next year for us, bigben?
You do the combination 'casts, Notlob? Happy days if so. |
By:
Many thanks BigBen. I know nothing about horses so come to this forum every year for trends analysis. Had a tenner on Ballabriggs and also a £2 forecast of Ballabriggs and Oscar Time. Never had a big win on the National before and could hardly speak after the finish. Cheers!
|