X Factor 2010
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Any views on why 4 finalists instead of 3 or 2?
My guess is it's because whereas in the early days they had "strict rules" that only the winner got a contract deal, they've now started dishing them out to anyone who even vaguely looks like they might sell a few records. And that they want to be able to market as many as possible as "X-Factor Finalist xxxxxx" rather than simply "X-Factor contestant who was so bad they couldn't even make the final".
It looks nailed on that OD, Matt & Cher at the very least will all get a contract. Possibly not just them.
My guess is it's because whereas in the early days they had "strict rules" that only the winner got a contract deal, they've now started dishing them out to anyone who even vaguely looks like they might sell a few records. And that they want to be able to market as many as possible as "X-Factor Finalist xxxxxx" rather than simply "X-Factor contestant who was so bad they couldn't even make the final".
It looks nailed on that OD, Matt & Cher at the very least will all get a contract. Possibly not just them.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
|
By:
the idea was for all judges to have an act in the final
|
|
By:
they're having 4 in the final to ensure One Direction make it to the final.
|
|
By:
As I thought, the last 4 acts are the ones they want to give contracts to.
|