X Factor 2010
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
i have a very interesting point,and one in which i believe is 100% true,if the viewers were to vote for who they wanted to GET RID of instead of the ones they want TO KEEP we would have had totally different results,no doubt about it,take all the x factor haters who are voting for the worst act to win (WAGNER) they wouldnt have the same advantage if it was voting to GET RID of the acts because they wouldnt know who to VOTE OUT as mathematically it would be against them,therefore wagner and katie would have been gone a long time ago,so next year id suggest mr cowell and co switch the voting to GET RID of there least favourite acts as oppose to voting for their favourites,
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
lots of discussion on here about that already evra, though whether cowell wants to lose the controversial types who generate press is doubtful
|
|
By:
Fat chance
You'd end up with a final of Treyc vs Paije |
|
By:
George is right. It's a stupid idea.
|
|
By:
i thought there might be nick,but just thought id bring it up as wasnt too sure,i agree with u though,its ecactly what cowell wants aint it?wether it be good or bad press,its better that no press in cowells eyes,he does make me laugh though every week when he suggests he trusts the public and the judges would never mark them out of 10 themselves "like other shows"
of course not simon,nothing got to do with the millions your making by having the public voting |
|
By:
Does anyone seriously believe that if they really wanted rid of Wagner, they could not arrange that?
And as for voting to evict (aside from demeaning the object of a talent competition) how would it get rid of Katie? The judges have already proved they'll save her over genuine talent. |
|
By:
But would the anti Cowell voters first get together to just try to vote out Matt, then One D, Rebecca, Cher etc etc. Same principal isn't it?
|